SB 142 — An Act prohibiting enforcement of covenants not to compete in broadcast employment agreements.
Last action — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9), June 30, 2026
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill prohibits enforcing non-compete clauses in broadcast employment agreements.
This legislation aims to prevent employers in the broadcast industry from enforcing non-compete clauses against their employees. By eliminating these provisions, the bill seeks to enhance job mobility for workers in broadcasting.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means you may have more flexibility to seek new job opportunities in broadcast without legal penalties.
- Families: This could lead to more job opportunities for individuals in the broadcast industry, potentially benefiting family income.
Summary
Non-Compete Provisions in Broadcast Contracts
Bill Text
- Printer's No. 0087 View text Current
Action History
-
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9), June 30, 2026
-
First consideration, June 2, 2026
-
Reported as committed, June 2, 2026
-
Referred to LABOR AND INDUSTRY, Jan. 22, 2025
Sponsors
- John I. Kane · Cosponsor
- Nick Pisciottano · Cosponsor
- Christine M. Tartaglione · Cosponsor
- Timothy P. Kearney · Cosponsor
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Camera Bartolotta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 247 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- John I. Kane Democratic
- Nick Pisciottano Democratic
- Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic
- Timothy P. Kearney Democratic
- Jay Costa Democratic
Not signed on (247)
247 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 247 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 142 do?
- Non-Compete Provisions in Broadcast Contracts
- Who sponsors SB 142?
- SB 142 is sponsored by John I. Kane (Democratic), Nick Pisciottano (Democratic), Christine M. Tartaglione (Democratic), Timothy P. Kearney (Democratic), Jay Costa (Democratic), and Camera Bartolotta (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 142?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 142?
- Track SB 142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →