HB 2190 — An Act amending the act of July 23, 1970 (P.L.563, No.195), known as the Public Employe Relations Act, in collective bargaining impasse, further providing for arbitration; and, in strikes, further providing for prohibited strikes.
Last action — Laid on the table (Pursuant to House Rule 71), July 12, 2026
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 03, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
25 sponsors
1 primary, 24 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (24 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill allows binding arbitration for police during collective bargaining impasses.
This legislation amends the Public Employe Relations Act to provide for binding arbitration for police in contract negotiations. It also updates the provisions about prohibited strikes for police officers.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means police workers could see changes in how their contracts are negotiated and resolved.
Summary
Allowing Binding Arbitration for All Police
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
26 added · 47 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill HB 2190 clarifies that when specific employees, like prison guards and peace officers, reach an impasse in collective bargaining, their disagreement will be resolved by a panel of arbitrators. This arbitrator's decision will be binding for the parties involved, except when the decision requires new legislation to be enforceable, which will then serve only as a recommendation. This change matters because it provides a clearer process for resolving disputes in critical public sectors, ensuring that essential services remain uninterrupted while protecting employee rights.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
2852 PRINTER'STHE NO.GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
32772190 THE2026 GENERALINTRODUCED ASSEMBLYBY OFGOUGHNOUR, PENNSYLVANIAMARKOSEK, HOUSEMcNEILL, BILLWAXMAN, SessionHADDOCK, ofRIVERA, 2026HARKINS, No.MUNROE, HILL-EVANS, MALAGARI, BRENNAN, INGLIS, STEELE, PIELLI, MULLINS, RASEL, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ, MADDEN, D.
INTRODUCEDWILLIAMS, BYDOUGHERTY, GOUGHNOUR,BOROWSKI, MARKOSEK,O'MARA, McNEILL,KINKEAD, WAXMAN,GIRAL HADDOCK,AND RIVERA,PROKOPIAK, HARKINS,FEBRUARY MUNROE,2, HILL-EVANS,2026 MALAGARI,REFERRED BRENNAN,TO INGLIS,COMMITTEE STEELE,ON PIELLI,JUDICIARY, MULLINS,FEBRUARY RASEL,3, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ,2026 MADDEN,AN D.ACT Amending the act of July 23, 1970 (P.L.563, No.195), entitled and bargain collectively through selected representatives;
WILLIAMS, DOUGHERTY, BOROWSKI, O'MARA, KINKEAD, GIRAL AND PROKOPIAK, FEBRUARY 2, 2026 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, APRIL 27, 2026 AN ACT Amending the act of July 23, 1970 (P.L.563, No.195), entitled "An act establishing rights in public employes to organize and bargain collectively through selected representatives;
providing arbitration for certain public employes for collective bargaining;bargaining impasses;
establishingdefining unfairthe employescope and of employercollective practices;bargaining;
establishing unfair employe and employer practices;
and establishing proceduresimpasse, forfurther implementation,"providing infor collectivearbitration.ve bargaining impasse,The furtherGeneral providingAssembly forof arbitration;the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
AND, IN STRIKES, <-- FURTHER PROVIDING FOR PROHIBITED STRIKES.
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
Section 805 of the act of July 23, 1970 (P.L.563, <-- No.195), known as the Public Employe Relations Act, is amended to read:
SECTION 1.
SECTIONS 805 AND 1001 OF THE ACT OF JULY 23, 1970 <-- (P.L.563, NO.195), KNOWN AS THE PUBLIC EMPLOYE RELATIONS ACT, ARE AMENDED TO READ:
SECTION 1001.
STRIKES BY GUARDS AT PRISONS OR MENTAL <-- HOSPITALS, UNITS OF PEACE OFFICERS AS DEFINED UNDER 18 PA.C.S.
§ 501 (RELATING TO DEFINITIONS) WHO ARE COVERED BY THIS ACT OR EMPLOYES DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH AND NECESSARY TO THE FUNCTIONING OF THE COURTS OF THIS COMMONWEALTH ARE PROHIBITED AT ANY TIME.
IF A STRIKE OCCURS THE PUBLIC EMPLOYER SHALL FORTHWITH INITIATE IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE JURISDICTION WHERE THE STRIKE OCCURS, AN ACTION FOR APPROPRIATE EQUITABLE RELIEF INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INJUNCTIONS.
IF THE STRIKE INVOLVES COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYES, THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYER OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHERE REQUIRED BY LAW SHALL INSTITUTE AN ACTION FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, EITHER IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE JURISDICTION WHERE THE STRIKE HAS OCCURRED OR THE COMMONWEALTH COURT.
20260HB2190PN327720260HB2190PN2852 - 2 -
Action History
-
Laid on the table (Pursuant to House Rule 71), July 12, 2026
-
Removed from table, June 9, 2026
-
Laid on the table, April 27, 2026
-
First consideration, April 27, 2026
-
Reported as amended, April 27, 2026
-
Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 3, 2026
Sponsors
- Dan Goughnour · Primary
- Brandon J. Markosek · Cosponsor
- Jeanne McNeill · Cosponsor
- Ben Waxman · Cosponsor
- Jim Haddock · Cosponsor
- Nikki Rivera · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Harkins · Cosponsor
- Brian Munroe · Cosponsor
- Carol Hill-Evans · Cosponsor
- Steven R. Malagari · Cosponsor
- Tim Brennan · Cosponsor
- John C. Inglis III · Cosponsor
- Mandy Steele · Cosponsor
- Chris Pielli · Cosponsor
- Kyle J. Mullins · Cosponsor
- Brian C. Rasel · Cosponsor
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz · Cosponsor
- Maureen E. Madden · Cosponsor
- Dan K. Williams · Cosponsor
- Sean Dougherty · Cosponsor
- Lisa A. Borowski · Cosponsor
- Jennifer O'Mara · Cosponsor
- Emily Kinkead · Cosponsor
- Jose Giral · Cosponsor
- Jim Prokopiak · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 24 co-sponsors · 228 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dan Goughnour Democratic
Co-sponsors (24)
- Brandon J. Markosek Democratic
- Jeanne McNeill Democratic
- Ben Waxman Democratic
- Jim Haddock Democratic
- Nikki Rivera Democratic
- Patrick J. Harkins Democratic
- Brian Munroe Democratic
- Carol Hill-Evans Democratic
- Steven R. Malagari Democratic
- Tim Brennan Democratic
- John C. Inglis III Democratic
- Mandy Steele Democratic
- Chris Pielli Democratic
- Kyle J. Mullins Democratic
- Brian C. Rasel Republican
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz Democratic
- Maureen E. Madden Democratic
- Dan K. Williams Democratic
- Sean Dougherty Democratic
- Lisa A. Borowski Democratic
- Jennifer O'Mara Democratic
- Emily Kinkead Democratic
- Jose Giral Democratic
- Jim Prokopiak Democratic
Not signed on (228)
228 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 228 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2190 do?
- Allowing Binding Arbitration for All Police
- Who sponsors HB 2190?
- HB 2190 is sponsored by Dan Goughnour (Democratic), Brandon J. Markosek (Democratic), Jeanne McNeill (Democratic), Ben Waxman (Democratic), Jim Haddock (Democratic), Nikki Rivera (Democratic), Patrick J. Harkins (Democratic), Brian Munroe (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Steven R. Malagari (Democratic), Tim Brennan (Democratic), John C. Inglis III (Democratic), Mandy Steele (Democratic), Chris Pielli (Democratic), Kyle J. Mullins (Democratic), Brian C. Rasel (Republican), Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (Democratic), Maureen E. Madden (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), Sean Dougherty (Democratic), Lisa A. Borowski (Democratic), Jennifer O'Mara (Democratic), Emily Kinkead (Democratic), Jose Giral (Democratic), and Jim Prokopiak (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 2190?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 03, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 2190?
- Track HB 2190 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2190
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2190
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →