Connecticut 2026 Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 4 D · 2 R cosponsors

SB 402 — AN ACT REVISING THE DEFINITION OF "RETIRED POLICE OFFICER" FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING SCHOOL SECURITY SERVICES.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 383

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 04, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    6 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (4 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

79 added · 10 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 402 clarifies that school districts are not allowed to hire security or police officers with firearms if those individuals are prohibited from possessing a firearm. This change is important because it strengthens safety protocols in schools, ensuring that only qualified personnel are armed. By establishing this guideline, the bill aims to enhance the security and safety of students and staff in the school environment.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
402 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
301 February Session, 2026 Senate Bill No.
1436 Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY Introduced by:
402 Senate, April 1, 2026 The Committee on Public Safety and Security reported through SEN.
(PS) AN ACT REVISING THE DEFINITION OF "RETIRED POLICE OFFICER" FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING SCHOOL SECURITY SERVICES.
GASTON of the 23rd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT REVISING THE DEFINITION OF "RETIRED POLICE OFFICER" FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING SCHOOL SECURITY SERVICES.
(b) A municipality or a local or regional board of education may employ or enter into an agreement with a retired police officer to provide security services in a public school if such retired police officer is a qualified retired law enforcement officer,as defined in 18 USC 926C, LCO 1436 1 of 3 Raised Bill No.
(b) A municipality or a local or regional board of education may employ or enter into an agreement with a retired police officer to SB402 / File No.
402 as amended from time to time.
301 1 SB402 File No.
301 provide security services in a public school if such retired police officer is a qualified retired law enforcement officer,as defined in 18 USC 926C, as amended from time to time.
Section 1 October 1, 2026 10-244a PS Joint Favorable LCO 1436 2 of 3 Raised Bill No.
Section 1 October 1, 2026 10-244a SB402 / File No.
402 LCO 1436 3 of 3
301 2 SB402 File No.
301 PS Joint Favorable SB402 / File No.
301 3 SB402 File No.
301 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill specifies that school districts cannot hire security or police officers who will possess a firearm if they are prohibited from being hired by a law enforcement unit.
The bill has no fiscal impact as it is not expected to increase security costs incurred by school districts.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB402 / File No.
301 4 SB402 File No.
301 OLR Bill Analysis SB 402 AN ACT REVISING THE DEFINITION OF "RETIRED POLICE OFFICER" FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING SCHOOL SECURITY SERVICES.
SUMMARY This bill disqualifies anyone who is prohibited from being hired by a law enforcement unit from being hired to provide armed security services in public schools as a retired police officer.
Existing law, unchanged by the bill, limits who a municipality or board of education can employ or contract with for these services to (1) sworn members of local police departments and (2) retired police officers.
By law, law enforcement units cannot hire someone who was previously employed as a police officer and (1) was dismissed for malfeasance or serious misconduct calling into question his or her fitness to serve as an officer or (2) resigned or retired during an investigation into such conduct.
In addition to the bill’s disqualification, existing law generally limits who can qualify as a retired police officer to those who (1) served with a local police department, the State Police, a federal law enforcement agency, or an out-of-state police department, (2) left in good standing, and (3) are a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” under the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 BACKGROUND Malfeasance and Serious Misconduct Under existing law, “malfeasance” has its common meaning (i.e.
a wrongful, unlawful, or dishonest act) and “serious misconduct” means SB402 / File No.
301 5 SB402 File No.
301 anofficer’simproperorillegalactionsconnectedwithofficialdutiesthat could cause a miscarriage of justice or discrimination, such as a felony conviction, evidence fabrication, repeated use of excessive force, bribe acceptance, or fraud.
Related Bills sSB 397, § 11, favorably reported by the Judiciary Committee, modifies the law restricting law enforcement unit hirings so that it applies against specified peace officers instead of police officers.
sHB 5323, § 6, favorably reported by the Education Committee, (1) allows qualifying former parole officers, under certain conditions, to be armed security guards in public schools and (2) makes retired officers who left due to disciplinary action or while under investigation or while a disciplinary action was pending ineligible to provide these services.
COMMITTEE ACTION Public Safety and Security Committee Joint Favorable Yea 29 Nay 0 (03/17/2026) SB402 / File No.
301 6
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 383

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. SENATE PASSED

  4. FILE NO. 301

  5. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 211

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  8. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. Joint Favorable

  11. PUBLIC HEARING 0310

  12. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Safety and Security

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (181)

181 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 181 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 402?
SB 402 is sponsored by Paul Cicarella (Republican), Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Jill Barry (Democratic), Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Fred Gee (Democratic), and Greg S. Howard (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 402?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 04, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 402?
Track SB 402 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 402

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 402

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →