HR 10 — RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ISAIAH LINDSAY, ET AL. V. NANCY NAVARETTA IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, ET AL.
Last action — FILE NO. 711
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 06, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
85 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of House Resolution No. 10 now includes a fiscal impact statement detailing that it will cost the Department of Mental Health and Addiction approximately $3.5 million in the first year and $7 million in the second year. This addition clarifies the financial implications of the resolution, helping lawmakers understand how it might affect the state budget. By explicitly outlining these costs, it provides more transparency regarding the potential impact on public resources, particularly in mental health services.
House of Representatives General Assembly HouseFile Resolution No.
10711 February Session, 2026 LCOHouse Resolution No.
377710 ReferredHouse toof Representatives, April 21, 2026 The House Committee on APPROPRIATIONSAppropriations Introducedreported by:through REP.
REP.WALKER of the 93rd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the resolution ought to be adopted.
RITTER, 1 Dist.
REP.
ROJAS, 9 Dist.
APP House Favorable LCOHR10 3777/ 1File ofNo. 1
711 1 HR10 File No.
711 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Mental Health & Addiction GF - Cost $3.5 million $7 million Serv., Dept.
Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The resolution results in a cost to the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) of approximately $3.5 million in FY and $7 million in FY 28.
The resolution approves the provisions of the settlementagreement,Lindsayetal.v.Navarretta,etal.,whichsupports the timely discharge ofindividuals deemed clinically ready to transition from Whiting Forensic Hospital into the community.
The agreement requires the state to make their best efforts to obtain funding for the settlement requirements and obtain approval via the General Assembly (CGA) in the 2026 session.
HB 5032, the Appropriations Committee budget, contains related partial year funding of $3.5 million in FY 27 under DMHAS.
If the CGA does not approve the settlement agreement in the specified timeframe, it becomes null and void and unenforceable.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the approval and discharge of HR10 / File No.
711 2 HR10 File No.
711 individuals transitioning to the community and associated services provided.
HR10 / File No.
711 3 HR10 File No.
711 OFA Bill Analysis HR 10 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ISAIAH LINDSAY, ET AL.
V.
NANCY NAVARETTA IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, ET AL.
SUMMARY:
The resolution deems that the provisions of the settlement agreement intheactionIsaiahLindsay,et al.v.Nancy Navaretta, requiring General Fund expenditures in excess of $2.5 million, are approved.
BACKGROUND Lindsay et al.
v.
Navarretta, et al.
Settlement Agreement The settlement agreement, Lindsay et al.
v.
Navarretta, et al., was signed on 3/26/26 with the purpose of resolving claims regarding the timely provisionofmentalhealthservicesinthemost integratedsetting.
The settlement requires the state to take specific steps to create and/or modify their policies, procedures, and practices to ensure that current and future acquittees who are committed to the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), assigned Full Level 4 privileges, and have been determined by Whiting Forensic Hospital to be ready for temporary leave, can transition to community mental health services in a timely manner.
The agreement requires the state to make their best efforts to obtain funding for the settlement requirements and obtain approval via the General Assembly in the 2026 session.
The agreement also specifies the state is responsible for the cost of Independent Reviewer services, $435,000 in attorneys’ fees to Disability Rights Connecticut, and $12,000 in expenses to the Connecticut Legal Rights Projects.
Show all 46 changed lines (6 more)
Implementation of the agreement is effective immediately upon final HR10 / File No.
711 4 HR10 File No.
711 court approval and remains in effect for seven years, unless terminated early under certain circumstances or extended for ongoing substantial noncompliance.
If the CGA does not approve the settlement agreement in the specified timeframe, it becomes null and void and unenforceable.
COMMITTEE ACTION Appropriations Committee House Favorable Report Yea 27 Nay 7 (04/14/2026) HR10 / File No.
711 5
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Action History
-
FILE NO. 711
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 478
-
TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
FAV. RPT. HOUSE COMM. ON Appropriations
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/20/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
House Favorable
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Appropriations
-
FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE HOUSE CLERK 0402
Sponsors
- Jason Rojas · Primary
- Matthew Ritter · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Jason Rojas Democratic
- Matthew Ritter Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 10?
- HR 10 is sponsored by Jason Rojas (Democratic) and Matthew Ritter (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HR 10?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 06, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 10?
- Track HR 10 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 10
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 10
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →