Connecticut 2026 Session Status: Passed House 3 D cosponsors

HR 3 — RESOLUTION PROPOSING APPROVAL OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD BETWEEN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH AND THE CONNECTICUT STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, SEIU LOCAL 2001, THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS AND THE UNION OF PROFESSIONAL JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES (AFT/AFT-CT, AFL-CIO).

Last action — ADOPTED, HOUSE

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

111 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the updated version of House Resolution No. 3, specific fiscal impacts related to the costs incurred by various state agencies have been clarified and detailed. Notably, the resolution provides exact dollar amounts associated with the costs expected in the 2026 and 2027 fiscal years for agencies like the Judicial Branch and the State Comptroller. This matters because it gives lawmakers a clearer understanding of the financial implications of the resolution, ensuring they can make informed decisions about budgeting and state resources.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly House Resolution No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
3 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
2 February Session, 2026 House Resolution No.
1398 Referred to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS Introduced by:
3 House of Representatives, February 24, 2026 The House Committee on Appropriations reported through REP.
REP.
WALKER of the 93rd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the resolution ought to be adopted.
RITTER, 1 Dist.
REP.
ROJAS, 9 Dist.
APP House Favorable LCO 1398 1 of 1
APP House Favorable HR3 / File No.
2 1 HR3 File No.
2 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27$ Judicial Branch Agencies GF - Cost 7,048,192 7,493,797 Judicial Dept.
BF - Cost 55,447 69,174 State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 900,759 957,707 Benefits1 Various Agencies Non-App Fund – Cost 69,778 79,040 Note:
GF=General Fund;
BF=Banking Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The resolution proposes approval of an arbitration award between the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch and the Connecticut State Employees Association SEIU local 2001, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers and the union of Professional Judicial Employees (AFT/AFT-CT, AFL-CIO) bargaining units.
The total cost of the agreement is $8,074,176 in FY 26 and $8,599,720 in FY 27.
The agreement impacts FY 26 and is retro-active to July 1, 2025.
The agreement includes a general wage increase (GWI) of 2.5%, an annual increment (AI) and lump sum payments to certain eligible employees.
The table below provides a summary of the salary and fringe costs associated with the agreement by fund.
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.82% of payroll in FY 27.
HR3 / File No.
2 2 HR3 File No.
2 Table 1.
Cost Estimate of Salary & Fringe by Fund Salary FY 26 FY 27 General Fund 7,048,192 7,493,797 Banking Fund 35,343 44,094 Appropriated Fund Subtotal 7,083,535 7,537,891 Non-Appropriated Funds 44,479 50,383 Salary Subtotal 7,128,014 7,588,274 Fringe General Fund 900,759 957,707 Banking Fund 20,103 25,081 Appropriated Fund Subtotal 920,862 982,788 Non-Appropriated Funds 25,299 28,658 Fringe Subtotal 946,162 1,011,446 Totals Total Appropriated Funds 8,004,397 8,520,679 Total Non-Appropriated Funds 69,778 79,040 TOTAL 8,074,176 8,599,720 Fringe Benefits Fringe benefit related costs will be incurred on the wage related provisions negotiated in the contract.
These benefits include Social Security, Medicare, state employee retirement system (SERS) normal cost, defined contribution (DC) match, and other post employment benefits (OPEB).
Salary & Wage Increases by Type Thethreedifferentsalaryandwageincreasesfunctiondifferentlyand therefore have distinct impacts in FY 26 and FY 27.
Table 2 below provides a summary of each increase type and their associated fiscal impact per year.
HR3 / File No.
2 3 HR3 File No.
2 Table 2.
Salary Increases by Type Type FY 26 FY 27 General Wage Increase (GWI) 4,410,370 4,410,370 Annual Increment (AI) 1,854,096 3,177,904 Lump Sum 863,548 - TOTAL 7,128,014 7,588,274 The General Wage Increase (GWI) is effective July 1, 2025, and impacts the salary and wages of employees going forward, therefore results in a consistent impact in both FY 26 and FY 27.
The annual increment also impacts an employees’ wages going forward, with an effective date of July 1, 2025, or January 1, 2026, depending upon the employee.
This results in a partial year impact in FY 26 which is then annualized in FY 27 once all employees receive a full year of the increased salary.
The Lump Sum payments included in this agreement are only for FY 26 and have no impact on future wages, therefore there is no impact in FY 27.
The Out Years The cost increase indicated above would continue into the out years.
Sources:Core-CT Financial Accounting System HR3 / File No.
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Previous
Latest
2 4 HR3 File No.
2 OFA Bill Analysis HR 3 RESOLUTION PROPOSING APPROVAL OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD BETWEEN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH AND THE CONNECTICUT STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, SEIU LOCAL 2001, THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS AND THE UNION OF PROFESSIONAL JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES (AFT/AFT-CT, AFL-CIO).
SUMMARY:
The resolution approves an arbitration award between the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch and the Connecticut State Employees Association SEIU local 2001, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers and the union of Professional Judicial Employees (AFT/AFT- CT, AFL-CIO) bargaining units, which was submitted to the Connecticut General Assembly for approval on February 13, 2026.
COMMITTEE ACTION Appropriations Committee House Favorable Yea 33 Nay 2 HR3 / File No.
2 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. ADOPTED, HOUSE

  2. RULES SUSPENDED

  3. FILE NO. 2

  4. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 27

  5. TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  6. FAV. RPT. HOUSE COMM. ON Appropriations

  7. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  8. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/02/26

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. House Favorable

  11. PUBLIC HEARING 0224

  12. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Appropriations

  13. FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE HOUSE CLERK 0213

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (184)

184 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 184 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HR 3?
HR 3 is sponsored by Jason Rojas (Democratic), Matthew Ritter (Democratic), and Iris N Sanchez (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 3?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HR 3?
Track HR 3 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 3

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 3

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →