SB 1036 — unemployment benefits; requirements; disqualifications; determinations
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on February 20, 2026.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
374 added · 383 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill SB 1036 clarify the eligibility requirements for unemployment benefits, particularly regarding individuals who are working reduced hours but still receiving compensation. The amendment specifies that those in a designated affected group will be considered unemployed if they work less than their normal weekly hours. This is significant because it broadens the definition of unemployment, making it easier for individuals who are partially employed to qualify for benefits, which can provide crucial support during economic downturns.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Governmentunemployment Secondbenefits; Regular Session S.B.
1036requirements; PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1036disqualifications; (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREENdeterminations UNDERLININGState INof BRACKETS]Arizona indicatesSenate textFifty-seventh addedLegislature toSecond statuteRegular orSession previouslySENATE enactedBILL session1036 law.AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 23-634.01, 23-762, 23-763, 23-771, 23-773 AND 23-776, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
[GreenRELATING underliningTO inEMPLOYMENT brackets]SECURITY. indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN(TEXT STRIKEOUTOF INBILL BRACKETS]BEGINS indicatesON newNEXT textPAGE) removed- fromi statute- orS.B. previously enacted session law.
[Green1036 strikeoutBe init brackets]enacted indicatesby textthe removedLegislature fromof existingthe statute,State previouslyof enactedArizona: session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
SenateD. Amendments to S.B.
1036 D.
2.- 1 - S.B.
1036 2.
Includes a certified statement by the employer that for the duration of the plan the reduction in the total normal weekly hours of work of the employees in the affected group is instead of layoffs which THAT otherwise would result in at least as large a reduction in the total -2-normal Senateweekly Amendmentshours toof S.B.work.
1036 normal weekly hours of work.
7.- 2 - S.B.
1036 7.
-3-C. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1036 C.
Notwithstanding section 23-621 or any other provision of this chapter, for purposes of this article an individual is unemployed in any week- for3 which- compensationS.B. is payable to the individual, as an employee in an affected group, for less than the individual's normal weekly hours of work in accordance with an approved plan in effect for the week.
1036 week for which compensation is payable to the individual, as an employee in an affected group, for less than the individual's normal weekly hours of work in accordance with an approved plan in effect for the week.
-4-(b) SenateIF AmendmentsTHE toINDIVIDUAL S.B.IS APPLYING FOR A WEEKLY BENEFIT, PROVIDES A WEEKLY REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT THAT DETAILS THE INDIVIDUAL'S WORK SEARCH ACTIONS FOR EVERY WEEK A BENEFIT IS SOUGHT.
1036 (b) IF THE INDIVIDUAL IS APPLYING FOR A WEEKLY BENEFIT, PROVIDES A WEEKLY REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT THAT DETAILS THE INDIVIDUAL'S WORK SEARCH ACTIONS FOR EVERY WEEK A BENEFIT IS SOUGHT.
(c)- If4 benefits- haveS.B. been paid in respect to the week.
1036 (c) If benefits have been paid in respect to the week.
-5-1. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1036 1.
C.- 5 - S.B.
1036 C.
Except as provided in subsection D of this section, unless -6-the Senateclaimant Amendmentsor an interested party, within seven calendar days after the delivery of notification, or within fifteen calendar days after notification was mailed to S.B.the claimant's or interested party's last known address, files an appeal from the determination, it shall become final, and benefits shall be paid or denied in accordance with the determination.
1036 the claimant or an interested party, within seven calendar days after the delivery of notification, or within fifteen calendar days after notification was mailed to the claimant's or interested party's last known address, files an appeal from the determination, it shall become final, and benefits shall be paid or denied in accordance with the determination.
If an appeal tribunal affirms a determination- of6 the- deputyS.B. allowing benefits, or the appeals board affirms a determination or decision allowing benefits, the benefits shall be paid regardless of any appeal that may thereafter be taken, but if that decision is finally reversed, no employer's account shall be charged with benefits so paid.
1036 determination of the deputy allowing benefits, or the appeals board affirms a determination or decision allowing benefits, the benefits shall be paid regardless of any appeal that may thereafter be taken, but if that decision is finally reversed, no employer's account shall be charged with benefits so paid.
-7-F. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1036 F.
An interested party may appeal within the time prescribed under subsection B of this section, and the same procedure- shall7 be- followedS.B. as provided for in case of an appeal from the original determination.
1036 procedure shall be followed as provided for in case of an appeal from the original determination.
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES BUREAU OF VITAL [RECORDS]RECORDS' [RECORDS'] DEATH RECORDS DATABASE OR A THIRD-PARTY, COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DEATH RECORDS DATABASE.
-8-- Senate8 Amendments- to S.B.
Show all 46 changed lines (6 more)
2.- 9 - S.B.
1036 2.
-9-3. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1036 3.
Enroll- and10 engross- to conform Amend title to conform JAKE HOFFMAN 1036HOFFMAN.docx 02/03/2026 2:41 PM C:
SK 130DXRYNP -10-
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (02/16/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Government View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
W/D
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Mark Finchem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1036?
- SB 1036 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1036?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1036?
- Track SB 1036 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1036
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1036
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →