HB 2825 — fines; fees; assessments; restitution; nonpayment
Last action — DPA
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
136 added · 146 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of House Bill 2825 includes new provisions that clarify the consequences for defendants who miss court hearings related to restitution payments. Now, the court is prohibited from issuing an arrest warrant for failing to appear at a hearing, which could help prevent unnecessary arrest situations. Additionally, the bill reinforces that a defendant can avoid penalties for a second failure to appear if they provide strong evidence of a serious medical emergency or other significant event. These changes are important because they aim to protect individuals in difficult situations while also ensuring that financial obligations are addressed fairly.
Fifty-seventhHouse LegislatureEngrossed Governmentfines; Second Regular Session H.B.
2825fees; PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2825assessments; (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREENrestitution; UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Greennonpayment underliningState inof brackets]Arizona indicatesHouse textof addedRepresentatives toFifty-seventh newLegislature sessionSecond lawRegular orSession textHOUSE restoringBILL existing2825 law.AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-810, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
[GREENRELATING STRIKEOUTTO INFINES. BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT strikeoutOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT removedPAGE) from- existingi statute,- previouslyH.B. enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green2825 carets>>Be indicateit aenacted sectionby addedthe toLegislature of the bill.State of Arizona:
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
In addition to any other remedy provided by law, including a writ of execution or other civil enforcement, if a defendant who is ordered to pay restitution defaults in the payment of the restitution or of any installment as ordered, the court, on motion of the prosecuting attorney, on petition of any person entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order or on its own motion, shall require the defendant to show cause why the defendant's default should not be treated as contempt and may issue a summons or a warrant of arrest for the defendant's appearance AT A HEARING TO DETERMINE THE DEFENDANT'S ABILITY TO PAY THE PREVIOUSLY HouseORDERED AmendmentsRESTITUTION. to H.B.
2825 ORDERED RESTITUTION.
At any hearing on the order to show cause FOR NONPAYMENT OF A FINE, A SURCHARGE, A FEE, AN ASSESSMENT, RESTITUTION OR INCARCERATION COSTS, the court, the prosecuting attorney or a person entitled to restitution- may1 examine- theH.B. defendant under oath concerning the defendant's financial condition, employment and assets or on any other matter relating to the defendant's ability to pay restitution.
2825 restitution may examine the defendant under oath concerning the defendant's financial condition, employment and assets or on any other matter relating to the defendant's ability to pay restitution.
-2-2. House Amendments to H.B.
2825 2.
IF THE PERSON OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO MAKE DISBURSEMENT FROM THE ASSETS OF THE ENTERPRISE FAIL TO MAKE THE PAYMENT, THE- COURT,2 ON- MOTIONH.B. OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, ON PETITION OF ANY PERSON ENTITLED TO RESTITUTION PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER OR ON ITS OWN MOTION, SHALL REQUIRE THE DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEFENDANT'S DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE TREATED AS CONTEMPT.
2825 THE COURT, ON MOTION OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, ON PETITION OF ANY PERSON ENTITLED TO RESTITUTION PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER OR ON ITS OWN MOTION, SHALL REQUIRE THE DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEFENDANT'S DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE TREATED AS CONTEMPT.
-3-1. House Amendments to H.B.
2825 1.
A DEFENDANT MAY NOT MOVE TO SET ASIDE A SECOND DEFAULT JUDGMENT THAT IS ENTERED [WITHINWITHIN ONE YEAR OF A PRIOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT]JUDGMENT FOR THE SAME UNDERLYING OBLIGATION UNLESS THE DEFENDANT PROVES BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE SECOND FAILURE TO APPEAR WAS DUE TO AN EXTRAORDINARY MEDICAL EMERGENCY OR OTHER CATASTROPHIC EVENT.
2.- 3 - H.B.
2825 2.
Enroll- and4 engross- to conform Amend title to conform WALT BLACKMAN 2825BLACKMAN.docx 02/03/2026 11:40 AM C:
JV 130ZVCNAN -4-
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version (02/19/2026) Current pdf
- HOUSE - Government View text pdf
- SENATE - Judiciary and Elections View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Analise Ortiz · Cosponsor
- Sarah Liguori · Cosponsor
- Walt Blackman · Cosponsor
- Chris Lopez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Chris Lopez Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Analise Ortiz Democrat
- Sarah Liguori Democrat
- Walt Blackman Republican
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 30 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Yea |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Yea |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Yea |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Yea |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Yea |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Yea |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Yea |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Yea |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Yea |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Yea |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Yea |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Yea |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Not Voting |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2825?
- HB 2825 is sponsored by Analise Ortiz (Democrat), Sarah Liguori (Democrat), Walt Blackman (Republican), and Chris Lopez (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2825?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2825?
- Track HB 2825 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2825
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2825
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →