SB 1745 — local excise taxes; rate limit
Last action — FAILED
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
44 added · 53 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 1745 clarifies the language regarding local excise taxes by removing the phrase "pursuant to this chapter." This change simplifies the language and makes it more direct, specifying that no local excise tax can exceed a rate of 2.5% for any classification. This matters because it helps ensure that the regulation of tax rates is clearer and easier to understand, which could benefit both taxpayers and local governments by promoting transparency in tax policies.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Governmentlocal Secondexcise Regulartaxes; Session S.B.
1745rate PROPOSEDlimit State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE AMENDMENTSBILL TO1745 S.B.AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 8, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-500.54;
1745RELATING (ReferenceTO toLOCAL printedEXCISE bill)TAXES. Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN(TEXT UNDERLININGOF INBILL BRACKETS]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- statutei or- previouslyS.B. enacted session law.
[Green1745 underliningBe init brackets]enacted indicatesby textthe addedLegislature toof newthe sessionState lawof orArizona: text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, ORDINANCE, CHARTER PROVISION, RESOLUTION OR SPECIAL ACT, A CITY OR TOWN WITH A POPULATION OF FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND OR MORE PERSONS MAY NOT LEVY OR ASSESS A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX OR EXCISE TAX THAT IS IMPOSED [PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER] AT A RATE OF MORE THAN TWO AND ONE-HALF PERCENT ON ANY TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX CLASSIFICATION.
A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX OR EXCISE TAX THAT IS APPROVED BY THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF A CITY OR TOWN IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IF THE SenateVOTER-APPROVED AmendmentsINCREASE toOCCURS S.B.AT AN ELECTION THAT IS CONDUCTED ON A CONSOLIDATED ELECTION DATE IN AN EVEN-NUMBER YEAR AS PRESCRIBED BY SECTION 16-204.
1745 VOTER-APPROVED INCREASE OCCURS AT AN ELECTION THAT IS CONDUCTED ON A CONSOLIDATED ELECTION DATE IN AN EVEN-NUMBER YEAR AS PRESCRIBED BY SECTION 16-204.
H.- 1 - S.B.
1745 H.
Enroll- and2 engross- to conform Amend title to conform JAKE HOFFMAN 1745HOFFMAN.docx 02/09/2026 03:52 PM C:
LAT 130TOVQOI -2-
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/04/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Government View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
FAILED
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Jake Hoffman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jake Hoffman Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Nay |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Nay |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1745?
- SB 1745 is sponsored by Jake Hoffman (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1745?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1745?
- Track SB 1745 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1745
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1745
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →