SCR 1023 — independent redistricting commission; membership
Last action — DP
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
286 added · 304 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1023 primarily clarify the voting requirements for the independent redistricting commission. Specifically, while 16 affirmative votes are needed for most official actions, approving final district boundaries will now require six or more affirmative votes. Additionally, the bill emphasizes that public meetings must comply with open meeting laws, and there's a specification regarding the timing of public notice. These adjustments aim to ensure a more transparent and representative process for redistricting, which is crucial for fair electoral boundaries.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Federalism,independent Militaryredistricting Affairscommission; & Elections Second Regular Session S.C.R.
membership State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1023 PROPOSEDA HOUSECONCURRENT OFRESOLUTION REPRESENTATIVESPROPOSING AMENDMENTSAN AMENDMENT TO S.C.R.THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA;
1023AMENDING (ReferenceARTICLE toIV, SenatePART engrossed2, bill)SECTION Amendment1, instructionCONSTITUTION key:OF ARIZONA;
[GREENRELATING UNDERLININGTO INTHE BRACKETS]INDEPENDENT indicatesREDISTRICTING textCOMMISSION. added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT underliningOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- newi session- lawS.C.R. or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN1023 STRIKEOUTBe INit BRACKETS]resolved indicatesby newthe textSenate removedof fromthe statuteState orof previouslyArizona, enactedthe sessionHouse law.of Representatives concurring:
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The resolution as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
The FAIR AND Houseindependent Amendmentsredistricting tocommission S.C.R.shall consist of five NINE members.
1023 independent redistricting commission shall consist of five NINE members.
Each member shall be a registered Arizona voter who has been continuously registered with the same political party or registered as unaffiliated with a political party for three or more years immediately preceding appointment, AND who is committed to applying the provisions of this section in an honest, independent and impartial fashion and to upholding public confidence in the integrity of the redistricting process.- 1 - S.C.R.
1023 process.
-2-(6) HouseG. Amendments to S.C.R.
1023 (6) G.
FOLLOWING THESE APPOINTMENTS, THE HIGHEST RANKING OFFICER ELECTED BY THE ARIZONA SENATE AND THE HIGHEST RANKING OFFICER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE SAME PARTY SHALL MAKE ONE APPOINTMENT JOINTLY AND THE MINORITY PARTY LEADER OF THE ARIZONA SENATE AND THE HIGHEST RANKING OFFICER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE- OF2 REPRESENTATIVES- WHOS.C.R. IS A MEMBER OF THE SAME PARTY SHALL MAKE ONE APPOINTMENT JOINTLY.
1023 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE SAME PARTY SHALL MAKE ONE APPOINTMENT JOINTLY.
-3-(9) HouseJ. Amendments to S.C.R.
1023 (9) J.
The nominees shall be of the same political party or status as was the member who vacated the office at the time of his or her appointment, and the appointment other than- the3 chair- ORS.C.R. OTHER COMMISSIONER APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION I OF THIS SECTION shall be made by the current holder of the office designated to make the original appointment.
1023 than the chair OR OTHER COMMISSIONER APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION I OF THIS SECTION shall be made by the current holder of the office designated to make the original appointment.
-4-(14) HouseO. Amendments to S.C.R.
1023 (14) O.
SO THAT THE POPULATION OF THE LARGEST LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT BY POPULATION SHALL NOT EXCEED THE POPULATION OF THE SMALLEST LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT BY POPULATION BY MORE THAN [FIVEFIVE THOUSAND PERSONS]PERSONS. [FIVE PERCENT].
C.- 4 - S.C.R.
1023 C.
-5-(17) HouseR. Amendments to S.C.R.
1023 (17) R.
(19)- T.5 - S.C.R.
1023 (19) T.
-6-(23) HouseX. Amendments to S.C.R.
1023 (23) X.
Enroll- and6 engross- to conform Amend title to conform AARON MÁRQUEZ SCR1023MÁRQUEZ.docx 03/24/2026 10:11 AM C:
ED 130QMMIOD -7-
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/09/2026) Current pdf
- HOUSE - Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref Resolution) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- J.D. Mesnard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- J.D. Mesnard Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Not Voting |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SCR 1023?
- SCR 1023 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
- What is the current status of SCR 1023?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCR 1023?
- Track SCR 1023 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCR 1023
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCR 1023
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →