HB 2144 — child support; preborn children
Last action — DP
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
202 added · 223 removedPlain-language change summary
House Bill 2144 has been updated to clearly include provisions for child support related to preborn children. Specifically, child support will now be calculated from the date of a confirmed positive pregnancy test. Additionally, the bill allows mothers to choose when to undergo genetic testing, either during pregnancy or after the child is born. These changes aim to clarify child support responsibilities and provide more flexibility for mothers regarding genetic testing.
ARIZONAHouse HOUSEEngrossed OFchild REPRESENTATIVESsupport; FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session Majority Research Staff HB 2144:
childpreborn support;children State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2144 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 25-320, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
prebornAMENDING childrenTITLE DIAZ25, FLOORCHAPTER AMENDMENT11, 1.ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 25-1502;
PermitsRELATING aTO motherCHILD toSUPPORT. choose to undergo genetic testing either during the pregnancy or after the birth of the child, if ordered by the court in any marital or domestic relations proceeding.
NM/NP(TEXT 2/25/2026OF (602)BILL 926-3848BEGINS Fifty-seventhON LegislatureNEXT DiazPAGE) Second- Regulari Session- H.B.
2144 ADDITIONALBe COWit DIAZenacted FLOORby AMENDMENTthe HOUSELegislature OFof REPRESENTATIVESthe AMENDMENTSState TOof H.B.Arizona:
2144 (Reference to House engrossed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
The court must first consider all relevant circumstances, including the conduct or Housemotivation Amendmentsof tothe H.B.parties in that filing and the diligence with which service of process was attempted on the obligor spouse or was frustrated by the obligor spouse.
2144 motivation of the parties in that filing and the diligence with which service of process was attempted on the obligor spouse or was frustrated by the obligor spouse.
The supreme court shall base the guidelines and criteria for deviation from them on all relevant- factors,1 considered- togetherH.B. and weighed in conjunction with each other, including:
2144 relevant factors, considered together and weighed in conjunction with each other, including:
-2-3. House Amendments to H.B.
2144 3.
If a personal check for support payments and handling fees is rightfully dishonored by the payor bank or other drawee, the person obligated to pay support shall make any subsequent support payments and handling fees only by cash, money order, cashier's check, traveler's check or- certified2 check.- H.B.
2144 or certified check.
In a title IV-D case, in accordance with established title IV-D criteria, establish a reasonable monthly cash medical support order to be -3-paid Houseby Amendmentsthe toobligor. H.B.
2144 paid by the obligor.
3.- 3 - H.B.
2144 3.
IF THE COURT ENTERS AN ORDER FOR CHILD SUPPORT FOR MEDICAL AND PREGNANCY-RELATED EXPENSES OF THE MOTHER, THE AMOUNT OF CHILD SUPPORT -4-ORDERED HouseFOR AmendmentsTHE toSUPPORT H.B.OF A PREBORN CHILD SHALL NOT EXCEED THE DIRECT MEDICAL AND PREGNANCY-RELATED EXPENSES OF THE MOTHER OF THE PREBORN CHILD.
2144PREGNANCY-RELATED ORDEREDEXPENSES FOR THE SUPPORT OF A PREBORN CHILD SHALL NOT EXCEEDINCLUDE THEANY DIRECT MEDICAL AND PREGNANCY-RELATED EXPENSES OFRELATED THETO MOTHERAN OFABORTION. THE PREBORN CHILD.
PREGNANCY-RELATED EXPENSES SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY EXPENSES RELATED TO AN [ELECTIVE] ABORTION.
Except pursuant to subsection E of this section and sections 25-501 and 25-809, the superior court- shall4 not- considerH.B. the factors when making child support orders, independent of the child support guidelines.
2144 court shall not consider the factors when making child support orders, independent of the child support guidelines.
<<Sec.Sec.
after birth [ININ ANY PROCEEDING BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE IN WHICH A MOTHER IS REQUIRED OR ORDERED TO UNDERGO GENETIC TESTING, THE MOTHER MAY ELECT TO UNDERGO THE GENETIC TESTING DURING THE PREGNANCY OR AFTER THE BIRTH OF THE CHILD.]>>CHILD. Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform LUPE DIAZ 2144FloorDIAZ.docx 01/26/2026 06:18 PM C:
LAT- 130PWPEXG5 -5--
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version (03/09/2026) Current pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Engrossed Bill - DIAZ - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Justin Olson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 21 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Justin Olson Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 21 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 21 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 35% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Not Voting |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2144?
- HB 2144 is sponsored by Justin Olson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2144?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2144?
- Track HB 2144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2144
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2144
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →