SB 1680 — traffic violations; photo radar; penalties
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 21, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The key change in SB 1680 is that it now requires all motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle, and motor-driven cycle operators or passengers under eighteen to wear helmets at all times. However, law enforcement can only issue citations for helmet violations to those specifically aged sixteen or seventeen who hold a driver’s license or permit. This change matters because it aims to enhance safety for younger riders while ensuring that only drivers who are more likely to understand the rules are penalized for any violations. Additionally, the removal of the section related to photo enforcement violations means that this bill now focuses solely on helmet use without addressing issues regarding traffic camera tickets.
SenateHouse Engrossed Senate Bill traffic violations;
penalties State(now: of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1680 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 28-1602, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATINGminors; TO TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS.
motorcycle helmets;
citations) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 246 SENATE BILL 1680 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 28-964, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO VEHICLES.
Section 28-1602,28-964, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
28-1602.28-964.
PhotoMotorcycles; enforcement violations;
lawall-terrain enforcementvehicles; review;
violation;motor driven cycles;
classification;equipment;
serviceexception; of process;
nocitations; duty to identify photo or respond;
payment;community service A.
definitionsAn A.operator or passenger of a motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or motor driven cycle who is under eighteen years of age shall wear at all times a protective helmet on the operator's or passenger's head in an appropriate manner.
NotwithstandingA anyLAW otherENFORCEMENT law,OFFICER ifMAY aISSUE personA receivesCITATION aFOR noticeA ofVIOLATION violationOF inTHIS theSUBSECTION mailONLY forTO aAN violationOPERATOR ofOR chapterPASSENGER 3,WHO articleIS 3SIXTEEN orOR 6SEVENTEEN ofYEARS thisOF titleAGE orAND ofWHO aHAS cityBEEN orISSUED townA ordinanceDRIVER forLICENSE excessiveOR speedPERMIT. or failure to obey a traffic control device that is obtained using a photo enforcement system, the person does not have to do either of the following:
The protective helmet shall be safely secured while the operator or passenger is operating or riding on the motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or motor driven cycle.
An operator of a motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or motor driven cycle shall wear at all times protective glasses, goggles or a transparent face shield of a type approved by the director unless the motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or motor driven cycle is equipped with a protective windshield.
This subsection does not apply to ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
IdentifyElectrically whopowered isthree inwheeled vehicles or three wheeled vehicles on which the photo.operator and passenger ride within an enclosed cab.
RespondA toMOTORCYCLE, theALL-TERRAIN noticeVEHICLE ofOR violation.MOTOR DRIVEN CYCLE THAT IS A FARM OR AGRICULTURAL VEHICLE IF THE OPERATOR OR PASSENGER IS ENGAGED IN AGRICULTURAL WORK.
3.
AN ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-101, PARAGRAPH 3, SUBDIVISION (b).
4.
A MOTORCYCLE, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE OR MOTOR DRIVEN CYCLE THAT IS OPERATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
TheA noticemotorcycle, ofall-terrain violationvehicle mustand statemotor driven cycle shall be equipped with a rearview mirror, seat and footrests for the following:operator.
1.A motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or motor driven cycle operated with a passenger shall be equipped with a seat and footrests for the passenger.
The notice OF VIOLATION is not a court issued document and the recipient is under no obligation to identify the person or respond to the notice OF VIOLATION.
2.
Failure to respond to the notice OF VIOLATION may result in official service that may result in an additional fee being levied.
BeforeAN aOPERATOR citationOF isA issued,MOTORCYCLE, aALL-TERRAIN lawVEHICLE enforcementOR agencyMOTOR mustDRIVEN reviewCYCLE evidenceWHO thatIS isAT recordedLEAST byEIGHTEEN aYEARS photoOF enforcementAGE systemMAY toBE determineISSUED whetherA aCITATION violationIF ofEITHER chapterOF 3,THE articleFOLLOWING 3OCCURS: or 6 of this title or of a city or town ordinance for excessive speed or failure to obey a traffic control device occurred.
D.
A photo enforcement company may not determine whether a violation of chapter 3, article 3 or 6 of this title occurred for the purpose of the issuance of ISSUING a citation.
A violation of this subsection is a class 1 misdemeanor.
E.
In addition to any other means authorized by the Arizona rules of civil procedure, alternative service of process must be sent by certified mail with an additional copy by regular mail and a notice must be posted on the front door of the business or residence and, if present and accessible, a residence's garage door.
Service of the complaint is complete on filing the mailing receipt and proof of posting in the court having jurisdiction of the violation.
Notwithstanding any other law, a person's driving privileges may not be suspended or revoked as a result of a citation that is served by alternative service of process under this subsection.
F.
Show all 59 changed lines (19 more)
If a law enforcement agency issues a citation as a result of a photo enforcement system and serves the citation in a manner other than what is prescribed by section 28-1593, subsection A, the agency shall inform the person that there is no obligation to identify the driver or respond to the citation.
Failure to respond to the citation will result in the probability that the person will be formally served pursuant to - 1 - S.B.
1680 state law and the Arizona rules of civil procedure which will likely result in the person being required to pay the cost of the service.
G.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, IF A PERSON IS FOUND RESPONSIBLE FOR A VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 3 OR 6 OF THIS TITLE OR OF A CITY OR TOWN ORDINANCE FOR EXCESSIVE SPEED OR FAILURE TO OBEY A TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE AND THAT IS OBTAINED USING A PHOTO ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM, THE PERSON IS SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100.
IF THE PERSON FULLY PAYS THE CIVIL PENALTY WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER THE FINDING OF RESPONSIBILITY:
A DEPARTMENTPASSENGER OROF ANTHE AGENCYMOTORCYCLE, OFALL-TERRAIN THISVEHICLE STATEOR MAYMOTOR NOTDRIVEN CONSIDERCYCLE THEIS VIOLATIONUNDER FOREIGHTEEN THEYEARS PURPOSE OF DETERMININGAGE WHETHERAND THEIS PERSON'SNOT DRIVERWEARING LICENSEA SHOULDPROTECTIVE BEHELMET SUSPENDEDAS ORPRESCRIBED REVOKED.IN SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION.
AN INSURER MAY NOT CONSIDER THE VIOLATIONOPERATOR ASOR APASSENGER TRAFFICOF VIOLATION AGAINST THE PERSONMOTORCYCLE, FORALL-TERRAIN THEVEHICLE PURPOSESOR OF ESTABLISHING RATES FOR MOTOR VEHICLEDRIVEN LIABILITYCYCLE INSURANCEIS ORUNDER DETERMININGEIGHTEEN THEYEARS INSURABILITY OF THEAGE PERSON.AND IS BOTH:
AN(a) INSURER MAY NOT CANCELWEARING ORA REFUSEPROTECTIVE TOHELMET RENEWAS ANYPRESCRIBED POLICYIN OFSUBSECTION INSURANCEA BECAUSE OF THETHIS VIOLATION.SECTION.
G.- 1 - S.B.
H.1680 (b) IN THE SAME GROUP OR PARTY AS THE OPERATOR OF THE INITIAL MOTORCYCLE, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE OR MOTOR DRIVEN CYCLE WHO IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE.
ForD. the purposes of this section:
1.FOR AN INITIAL VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, A PERSON IS SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100 OR COMMUNITY SERVICE IF THE PERSON IS SIXTEEN OR SEVENTEEN YEARS OF AGE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION.
"NoticeAPPROVED ofBY violation"THE meansGOVERNOR aJUNE notice21, issued2024. by a photo enforcement company or municipality that is not a uniform traffic ticket and complaint.
2.FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE JUNE 21, 2024.
"Photo enforcement system" has the same meaning prescribed in section 28-601.
Sec.
2.
Effective date This act is effective from and after May 31, 2025.
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- HOUSE - Transportation & Infrastructure - Strike Everything View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Gowan flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Janae Shamp · Cosponsor
- David Gowan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 29 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- David Gowan Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Janae Shamp Republican
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 21 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 13% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Nay |
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Nay |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Not Voting |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Not Voting |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 40% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1680?
- SB 1680 is sponsored by Janae Shamp (Republican) and David Gowan (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1680?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1680?
- Track SB 1680 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1680
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1680
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →