SB 1250 — employers; vaccines; religious exemption
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on March 30, 2023.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
118 added · 67 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Senate Bill 1250 expand the religious exemption for vaccinations that employees can claim from their employers. Previously, the bill focused on the COVID-19 vaccine, but the new version explicitly includes influenza vaccines as well and any vaccine authorized for emergency use. This change is significant because it broadens the range of vaccinations for which employees can opt out for religious reasons, potentially affecting workplace health policies. Additionally, the bill includes new provisions for handling complaints related to these exemptions, which could lead to more accountability for employers.
Fifty-sixthSenate LegislatureEngrossed Healthemployers; and Human Services First Regular Session S.B.
1250vaccines; PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1250religious (Referenceexemption toState printedof bill)Arizona PageSenate 1,Fifty-sixth lineLegislature 9,First strikeRegular "APPROVED"Session insertSENATE "AUTHORIZED"BILL Line1250 10,AN afterACT "USE"AMENDING insertSECTION "ONLY"23-206, LineARIZONA 20,REVISED strikeSTATUTES; "APPROVED" insert "AUTHORIZED" Line 21, after "ADMINISTRATION" insert "ONLY";
AFTERAMENDING "USE"TITLE insert23, "BY"CHAPTER Line2, 25,ARTICLE strike1, "APPROVED"ARIZONA insertREVISED "AUTHORIZED"STATUTES, LineBY 26,ADDING afterSECTION "USE"23-207; insert "ONLY" Line 35, strike "APPROVED" insert "AUTHORIZED" Line 36, after "USE" insert "ONLY" Page 2, line 1, strike "APPROVED" insert "AUTHORIZED";
afterRELATING "ADMINISTRATION"TO insertVACCINATIONS. "ONLY";
after(TEXT "FOR"OF insertBILL "AN"BEGINS LineON 6,NEXT strikePAGE) "APPROVED"- inserti "AUTHORIZED"- LineS.B. 7, after "USE" insert "ONLY" Line 12, strike "NOT";
strike1250 "OR"Be Strikeit linesenacted 13by andthe 14,Legislature insertof "FORthe INTERNALState USEof ONLY."Arizona: Between lines 23 and 24, insert:
"Sec.Section 1.
Section 23-206, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
23-206.
Employers;
accommodations required vaccinations;
religious exemption;
form;
definitions A.
If an employer receives notice from an employee that the employee's sincerely held religious beliefs, practices or observances prevent the employee from taking the COVID-19 vaccination, INFLUENZA A OR B VACCINATION OR FLU VACCINATION OR ANY VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY, the employer shall provide a reasonable accommodation unless the accommodation would pose an undue hardship and more than a de minimus cost to the operation of the employer's business.
B.
AN EMPLOYER MAY NOT:
1.
INQUIRE INTO THE VERACITY OF AN EMPLOYEE'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, PRACTICES OR OBSERVANCES TO THE EXTENT BEYOND WHAT IS ALLOWED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE REGARDING EMPLOYMENT, WAGES OR BENEFITS BASED ON THE EMPLOYEE'S VACCINATION STATUS.
C.
AN EMPLOYER SHALL ALLOW AN EMPLOYEE TO REQUEST A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM THE COVID-19 VACCINATION, INFLUENZA A OR B VACCINATION OR FLU VACCINATION MANDATE OR ANY MANDATE FOR A VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION ONLY FOR EMERGENCY USE BY USING A FORM THAT MEETS THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:
RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM COVID-19 VACCINATION, INFLUENZA A OR B VACCINATION, FLU VACCINATION OR VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY EMPLOYEE NAME __________________________________ DATE OF BIRTH __________________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER __________________________________ EMPLOYER NAME __________________________________ EXEMPTION STATEMENT:
PURSUANT TO SECTION 23-206, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM REQUESTING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COVID-19 VACCINATION, INFLUENZA A OR B VACCINATION, FLU VACCINATION OR VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY BECAUSE OF MY SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
EMPLOYEE STATEMENT OF SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ______________________ EMPLOYEE STATEMENT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND VACCINE ____________ REQUESTED ACCOMMODATION AND ALTERNATIVE ACCOMMODATIONS _______________________ - 1 - S.B.
1250 I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE _______________________________ DATE _______________________________ EMPLOYEE NAME (PRINT) _______________________________ NOTE:
AN EMPLOYER MAY NOT INQUIRE INTO THE VERACITY OF THE EMPLOYEE'S SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, PRACTICES OR OBSERVANCES TO THE EXTENT BEYOND WHAT IS ALLOWED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
D.
ANY EMPLOYER THAT RECEIVES A REQUEST FOR A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL KEEP THE REQUEST AND ITS CONTENTS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY NOT SHARE THEM WITHIN THAT ORGANIZATION EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO PROCESS THE REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION, ACCOMMODATION OR OTHER OPERATIONAL NECESSITY.
EMPLOYERS MAY CREATE A DATABASE OF RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION REQUESTS FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY LAW.
E.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"COVID-19" MEANS:
(a) THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS IDENTIFIED AS SARS-COV-2.
(b) ANY DISEASE CAUSED BY SARS-COV-2, ITS VIRAL FRAGMENTS OR A VIRUS MUTATING THEREFROM.
(c) ALL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISEASE THAT ARE CAUSED BY SARS-COV-2, ITS VIRAL FRAGMENTS OR A VIRUS MUTATING THEREFROM.
2.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
"SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, PRACTICES OR OBSERVANCES" INCLUDES A SINCERELY HELD MORAL OR ETHICAL BELIEF.
Sec.
2.
AN EMPLOYEE MAY FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IF THE EMPLOYER DID NOT OFFER THE EMPLOYEE THEA FORM PRESCRIBEDTHAT INMEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 23-206 OR IMPROPERLY APPLIED OR DENIED THE EMPLOYEE'S RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION AND THE EMPLOYEE'S EMPLOYMENT WAS TERMINATED.
THE INVESTIGATION, AT A MINIMUM, SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE EMPLOYER IMPOSED A COVID-19 VACCINATION, SenateINFLUENZA AmendmentsA toOR S.B.B VACCINATION OR FLU VACCINATION MANDATE OR ANY MANDATE FOR A VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY, WHETHER THE EMPLOYEE WAS OFFERED AND SUBMITTED A PROPER EXEMPTION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 23-206 AND WHETHER THE EMPLOYEE WAS TERMINATED AS A RESULT OF THE EMPLOYER NOT PROVIDING THE EMPLOYEE A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM THE VACCINATION MANDATE.
1250IF INFLUENZA A OR B VACCINATION OR FLU VACCINATION MANDATE OR ANY MANDATE FOR A VACCINATION AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITEDATTORNEY STATESGENERAL FOODFINDS ANDTHAT DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY, WHETHER THE EMPLOYEERELIGIOUS WAS OFFERED AND SUBMITTED A PROPER EXEMPTION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 23-206 AND WHETHER THE EMPLOYEE WAS TERMINATED- AS2 A- RESULTS.B. OF THE EMPLOYER NOT PROVIDING THE EMPLOYEE A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM THE VACCINATION MANDATE.
IF1250 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FINDS THAT THE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION WAS NOT OFFERED OR WAS IMPROPERLY APPLIED OR DENIED AND THE EMPLOYEE'S EMPLOYMENT WAS TERMINATED, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOTIFY THE EMPLOYER OF ITS DETERMINATION AND ALLOW THE EMPLOYER THE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT THE NONCOMPLIANCE WITHIN TEN DAYS.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "COVID-19" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 23-206."23-206. Renumber to conform Page 2, line 28, strike "definitions" insert "definition" Line 33, strike ", INCLUDING THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT OF TERMINATION" Line 41, strike "APPROVED" insert "AUTHORIZED" Line 42, after "USE" insert "ONLY" Page 3, line 3, strike ", INCLUDING THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT" Line 4, strike "OF TERMINATION," Line 9, strike the colon Line 10, strike "1." insert a comma Strike lines 11 through 16 Amend title to conform JANAE SHAMP 1250SHAMP.docx 02/06/2023 08:34 AM C:
SK- -2-3 -
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- SENATE - Health and Human Services View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Shamp flr amend (ref HHS) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Steve Montenegro · Cosponsor
- Janae Shamp · Primary
- Steve Kaiser · Cosponsor
- Austin Smith · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on · 42 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Janae Shamp Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Steve Montenegro Republican
- Steve Kaiser
- Austin Smith
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 48% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Kaiser | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1250?
- SB 1250 is sponsored by Steve Montenegro (Republican), Janae Shamp (Republican), Steve Kaiser, and Austin Smith.
- What is the current status of SB 1250?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1250?
- Track SB 1250 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1250
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1250
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →