appropriations; crime victim notification fund
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1244 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1244.
You're tracking SB 1244
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1244 — appropriations; crime victim notification fund
Last action — Transmit to Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
85 added · 74 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 1244 introduces a new requirement for a tracking system specifically for sexual assault forensic examination kits. This system will provide crime victims with automated notifications about their kit's status and results through a user-friendly portal, ensuring they receive this information without needing to go through a registration process. This change is significant as it aims to enhance communication with victims, offering them timely updates and a sense of control over their cases during a very challenging time.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed appropriations;
crime victim notification fund (now:State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1244 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 41-180, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
taxAPPROPRIATING creditMONIES; extension;
affordableRELATING housing)TO StateTHE ofLAW ArizonaENFORCEMENT SenateCRIME Fifty-sixthVICTIM LegislatureNOTIFICATION FirstFUND. Regular Session SENATE BILL 1244 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 41-3954, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING TAX CREDITS.
SectionSection. 1.
Section1. 41-3954, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
41-3954.Section 41-180, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
Affordable41-180. housing tax credit;
limit;Law enforcement crime victim notification fund;
eligibilitysoftware; statement;
rules;vendor requirement A.
publicThe hearings;law enforcement crime victim notification fund is established consisting of legislative appropriations.
annualThe report;state treasurer shall administer the fund.
definitionsMonies A.in the fund are subject to legislative appropriation and may be used by law enforcement agencies in this state to fund software that does the following:
The1. affordable housing tax credit is established.
TheEnables departmentthe shallcounty-and-or-city-based administerCOUNTY theOR creditCITY, asOR providedBOTH, byBASED thisdeployment section.of an automated crime victim notification system to a user base consisting of law enforcement agencies.
The automated crime victim notification system must do the following:
(a) Automatically, and without the requirement to download a software application or to opt in to notifications, notify the victim by email or text of all of the following regarding a victim's law enforcement crime report, investigation and case:
(i) The date on which the report is filed.
(ii) The case number.
(iii) The name of the detective who is assigned to the case.
(iv) When arrests are made.
(v) When warrants are issued.
(vi) When the case is sent to the prosecuting agency.
(vii) Initial appearance.
(b) Interface with the law enforcement agency's system of record.
(c) Provide configurable triggers to send messages to crime victims.
(d) Provide the ability to attach informational brochures or other electronic attachments to the messages.
(e) Provide the ability for victims to find their case status on the agency's website.
(f) Be configurable to the requirements of each county and or city in this state.
(g) Include county, city or town branding, county, city or town email addresses and web domains for all communications.
(h) Provide the ability to send messages in multiple languages.
(i) Provide a short code or a long code telephone number with a local area code.
(j) Monitor the number of messages sent and the types of messages sent and visualize the data.
(k) PROVIDE CRIME VICTIMS WITH A TRACKING SYSTEM FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINATION KITS.
THE PROGRAM SHALL DO BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
(i) PROVIDE AN AUTOMATED NOTIFICATION ON THE STATUS AND RESULTS OF THE VICTIM'S SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINATION KIT.
- 1 - S.B.
1244 (ii) HAVE THE ABILITY FOR A VICTIM TO RECEIVE AN AUTOMATED UPDATE THROUGH A VICTIM PORTAL WITHOUT HAVING TO REGISTER OR TO GAIN ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND OTHER RESOURCES.
Show all 82 changed lines (42 more)
2.
Provides a criminal justice information service compliant automated victim notification platform that ensures the following:
(a) Crime victims are automatically notified by text and email following any updates to their case.
(b) Law enforcement agencies determine the notifications.
(c) Crime victims are able to proactively locate their case status online.
(d) No additional staffing is required.
OnA application,vendor theof departmentany shallsoftware allocatethat taxis creditsdescribed underin thissubsection sectionA forof projects in this state that qualify for the federal low-income housing tax credit under section 42must ofhave thepreviously internaldeployed revenuea codesolution and that are placed in service, for purposesa ofcity thepolice federaldepartment, credit,sheriff's fromoffice and afterprosecutor's Juneoffice. 30, 2022, in an amount equal to at least fifty percent of the amount of the federal credit allowed in each taxable year during the federal credit period.
The departmentpreviously shalldeployed allocatesolutions taxcould creditshave underbeen thisdeployed sectionin accordingArizona toor thein department'sanother currentstate, qualifiedor allocationa plancombination adopted pursuant to section 42(m) of theboth. internal revenue code.
TheLaw departmentenforcement shallagencies prescribethat forms,implement proceduressoftware andmeeting criteriathe forrequirements applying,of evaluatingthis andsection qualifyingmay forsubmit to the creditstate undertreasurer thisa section.request for reimbursement of A GRANT FOR the software costs.
The departmentstate treasurer shall issuereimburse anvalid eligibilityclaims statement for eachreimbursement qualifiedon projecta thatfirst-come, identifiesfirst-served thebasis. qualified project, the allocation year and the amount of the credits allocated to the project.
D.Sec.
The department shall allocate a total of $4,000,000 of tax credits under this section in any calendar year according to the date of the allocation of the credit.
An approved amount applies against the dollar limit for the year in which the application is submitted.
If, at the end of the calendar year, an unused balance occurs under the dollar limit prescribed by this subsection, the balance shall be reallocated for the purposes of this subsection in the following year.
E.
Any taxpayer that owns an interest in an investment in a qualified project that receives an eligibility statement from the department is allowed a tax credit under this section for taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2021 if the taxpayer acquires the interest before filing a tax return claiming the tax credit.
The taxpayer shall apply the credit against the taxpayer's insurance premium or income tax liability as provided by and subject to the procedures, terms and conditions prescribed by section 20-224.04, 43-1075 or 43-1163, as applicable.
F.
A qualified project that is approved for the purposes of the credit under this section is not eligible for any abatement, exemption or other reduction in state or local ad valorem property taxes otherwise allowed by statute.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION, THE VALUATION OF A QUALIFIED PROJECT PURSUANT TO TITLE 42, CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13 IS NOT A REDUCTION IN STATE OR LOCAL AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES.
- 1 - S.B.
1244 G.
The Arizona department of housing, with the cooperation of the department of insurance and financial institutions and the department of revenue, shall adopt rules and publish and prescribe forms and procedures as necessary to administer this section, including criteria on which eligibility statements are issued under this section.
H.
On or before July 30 of each year, the department shall hold a public hearing to solicit and accept public comments relating to the amount of the credit under this section to be used for qualified projects that are financed through tax-exempt bond issuance as part of the qualified allocation plan process and other affordable housing tax credit issues.
The department shall post a copy of all comments submitted during each public hearing on the department's website before September 15 of the year in which the public hearing is held.
I.
On or before December 31 of each year, the department shall submit to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives a report that addresses whether the credits approved under this section produced a significant number of additional affordable housing units in this state and that analyzes the economic impact of the credits approved under this section on this state.
The department shall provide a copy of this report to the secretary of state.
J.
For the purposes of this section:
1.
"Internal revenue code" has the same meaning prescribed by section 43-105.
"QualifiedAppropriations; project" means a qualified low-income building as defined in section 42(c)(2) of the internal revenue code.
3.law enforcement crime victim notification fund;
"Taxpayer"state meanstreasurer; a person, firm or corporation that is subject to taxation under title 20 or under title 43, chapter 10 or 11.
exemption A.
The sum of $7,600,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2023-2024 to the law enforcement crime victim notification fund established by section 41-180, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, and is appropriated from the law enforcement crime victim notification fund to the state treasurer to be used for the purposes prescribed in section 41-180, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, for use in fiscal years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025.
B.
The sum of $400,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2023-2024 to the state treasurer to evaluate, certify and pay for any costs associated with the law enforcement crime victim notification fund established by section 41-180, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, for use in fiscal years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025.
C.
The appropriations made in subsections A and B of this section are exempt from the provisions of section 35-190, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to lapsing of appropriations until from and after June 30, 2025.
Show all 82 changed rows (42 more)
View plain text versions (7)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - Appropriations - Strike Everything View text pdf
- SENATE - Military Affairs, Public Safety and Border Security View text pdf
- HOUSE - Appropriations View text pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to APPROP - Livingston - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
W/D
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- John Kavanagh · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 30 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- John Kavanagh Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 46 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 20% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 43 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 40% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Kaiser | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1244?
- SB 1244 is sponsored by John Kavanagh (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1244?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1244?
- Track SB 1244 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1244
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1244
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →