SB 1574 — voting irregularities; report; legislative review

REFERENCEFifty-fifth TITLE:Legislature Rules Second Regular Session S.B.

voting1574 irregularities;COMMITTEE ON RULES SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.

report;1574 (Reference to printed bill) Page 3, line 6 strike "LEGISLATE" insert "LEGISLATIVE" Amend title to conform 1574RULES 02/21/2022 09:08 AM S:

legislativeRH review State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session SB 1574 Introduced by Senator Townsend AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 16-621, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;

RELATING TO CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - SB 1574 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1.

Section 16-621, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

16-621.

Proceedings at the counting center;

violation;

classification A.

All proceedings at the counting center shall be under the direction of the board of supervisors or other officer in charge of elections and shall be conducted in accordance with the approved instructions and procedures manual issued pursuant to section 16-452 under the observation of representatives of each political party and the public.

The proceedings at the counting center may also be observed by up to three additional people representing a candidate for nonpartisan office, or representing a political committee in support of or in opposition to a ballot measure, proposition or question.

A draw by lot shall determine which three groups or candidates shall have representatives participate in the observation at the counting center.

Persons representing a candidate for nonpartisan office or persons or groups representing a political committee in support of or in opposition to a ballot measure, proposition or question, who are interested in participating in the observation, shall notify the officer in charge of elections of their desire to be included in the draw not later than seventeen days before the election.

After the deadline to receive submissions from the interested persons or groups, but prior to fourteen days before the election, the county officer in charge of elections shall draw by lot, from the list of those that expressed interest, three persons or groups and those selected shall be notified and allowed to observe the proceedings at the counting center.

If a group is selected the group may alter who represents that group for different days of observation but on any given observation day a selected group shall not send more than one observer.

A group may rotate an observer throughout the day.

Only those persons who are authorized for the purpose shall touch any ballot or ballot card or return.

All persons who are engaged in processing and counting of the ballots shall be qualified electors, shall be deputized in writing and shall take an oath that they will faithfully perform their assigned duties.

There shall be no preferential counting of ballots for the purpose of projecting the outcome of the election.

If any ballot, including any ballot received from early voting, is damaged or defective so that it cannot properly be counted by the automatic tabulating equipment, a true duplicate copy shall be made of the damaged or defective ballot in the presence of witnesses and substituted for the damaged or defective ballot.

All duplicate ballots created pursuant to this subsection shall be clearly labeled "duplicate" and shall bear a serial number that shall be recorded on the damaged or defective ballot.

B.

If the counting center automatic tabulating equipment includes an electronic vote adjudication feature that has been certified for use as prescribed by section 16-442 and the board of supervisors or officer in - 1 - SB 1574 charge of elections authorizes the use of this feature at the counting center, all of the following apply:

1.

The electronic vote adjudication feature shall be included in the tabulation system logic and accuracy testing prescribed by section 16-449.

2.

The board of supervisors or officer in charge of elections shall appoint an electronic vote adjudication board that consists of two judges who are overseen by an inspector, with the two judges equally divided between the two largest political parties as prescribed by section 16-531, subsection D to adjudicate and submit for tabulation a ballot that is read by the tabulation machine as blank in order to determine if voter intent is clear on a portion or all of the ballot, or any portion of any ballot as prescribed by section 16-610 or 16-611, or to tally write-in choices as prescribed by section 16-612.

3.

The electronic vote adjudication process used by the electronic vote adjudication board shall provide for:

(a) A method to track and account for the original ballot and the digital duplicate of the ballot created by the electronic vote adjudication feature that includes a serial number on the digital image that can be used to track electronic vote adjudication board actions.

(b) The creation and retention of comprehensive logs of all digital duplication and adjudication actions performed by an electronic vote adjudication board.

(c) The retention of the original ballot and the digital duplicate of the ballot.

C.

If for any reason it becomes impracticable to count all or a part of the ballots with tabulating equipment, the officer in charge of elections may direct that they be counted manually, following as far as practicable the provisions governing the counting of paper ballots.

D.

For any statewide, county or legislative election, the county recorder or officer in charge of elections shall provide for a live video recording of the custody of all ballots while the ballots are present in a tabulation room in the counting center.

The live video recording shall include date and time indicators and shall be linked to the secretary of state's website.