Arizona Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Introduced

HB 2267 — overtime pay

Last action — House First Reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill establishes a new section in Arizona law regarding overtime pay for certain exempt employees and sets specific requirements for their salary.

  • Title 23, chapter 2, article 7, Arizona Revised Statutes

    23-361.03. Overtime pay; exemption; rules A. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, TO QUALIFY AS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS EMPLOYED IN A BONA FIDE ADMINISTRATIVE, EXECUTIVE OR PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY AND WHO IS EXEMPT FROM THE OVERTIME PAY REQUIREMENTS AS PRESCRIBED IN THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 AND THE REGULATIONS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THAT ACT, AN INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE COMPENSATED ON A SALARY BASIS IN AN AMOUNT PER WEEK, EXCLUSIVE OF BOARD, LODGING OR OTHER FACILITIES, THAT IS NOT LESS THAN THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA UNDER SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION. B. THE SALARY REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO TEACHERS, LICENSED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, LICENSED ATTORNEYS OR OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE EMPLOYED IN A PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY TO WHOM THE SALARY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXEMPTION UNDER THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR REGULATIONS THAT WERE IN EFFECT IN 2015 WOULD NOT HAVE APPLIED. C. THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION PER WEEK UNDER SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION MAY BE EITHER: 1. FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS EMPLOYED IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY OR A PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY, PAID ON A FEE BASIS. 2. TRANSLATED INTO EQUIVALENT AMOUNTS AND PAID ON A BASIS THAT IS FOR A PERIOD OF TIME LONGER THAN ONE WEEK, INCLUDING BIWEEKLY, SEMIMONTHLY OR MONTHLY. D. ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, THE COMMISSION SHALL SET THE SALARY AMOUNT UNDER SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION AT THE FORTIETH PERCENTILE OF WEEKLY EARNINGS OF FULL-TIME NONHOURLY WORKERS IN THE LOWEST-WAGE CENSUS REGION IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE UPDATE PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. ON JANUARY 1, 2025, AND EVERY THREE YEARS THEREAFTER, THE COMMISSION SHALL ADJUST THE SALARY AMOUNT UNDER SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION TO EQUAL THE FORTIETH PERCENTILE OF WEEKLY EARNINGS OF FULL-TIME NONHOURLY WORKERS IN THE LOWEST-WAGE CENSUS REGION IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE UPDATE PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. E. THE COMMISSION MAY ADOPT RULES TO IMPLEMENT THIS SECTION.

    This new section defines overtime pay requirements for exempt employees based on specific salary criteria and establishes an ongoing adjustment process.

Action History

  1. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 86 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (86)

86 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 86 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2267?
HB 2267 is sponsored by Richard C. Andrade, Andres Cano, Domingo DeGrazia, Pamela Powers Hannley, Christian Solorio, Rosanna Gabaldon, and Raquel Terán.
What is the current status of HB 2267?
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2267?
Track HB 2267 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2267

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2267

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →