groundwater pumping; measuring; reporting
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1022 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1022.
You're tracking SB 1022
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1022 — groundwater pumping; measuring; reporting
Last action — Senate Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the requirements for water measuring devices and reporting of groundwater withdrawals and usage in Arizona.
-
Section 45-604
AND E of this section→ AND E of this sectionClarifies that there are additional exceptions for water measuring device requirements.
-
Section 45-604
OR A PERSON WHO WITHDRAWS GROUNDWATER FROM A NONEXEMPT WELL UNDER ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN ANY OTHER LOCATIONExpands the scope of people required to use water measuring devices.
-
Section 45-632
AND OUTSIDE OF AN IRRIGATION NON-EXPANSION AREARemoves geographic limitations for annual reporting of groundwater withdrawals.
-
Section 45-632
EXCEPT THAT A PERSON WHO WITHDRAWS GROUNDWATER FOR AN IRRIGATION USE FROM A NONEXEMPT WELL IS EXEMPT FROM ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS IF THE GROUNDWATER IS USED ONLY ON LAND THAT IS OWNED BY A PERSON WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO IRRIGATE TEN OR FEWER CONTIGUOUS ACRES AT THE PLACE OF USE AND THE LAND IS NOT PART OF AN INTEGRATED FARMING OPERATION OF MORE THAN TEN ACRESClarifies exemptions for annual reporting for certain irrigation uses.
-
Section 45-632
AS PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTOR UNDER SUBSECTION P Q OF THIS SECTION→ AS PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTOR UNDER SUBSECTION P OF THIS SECTIONCorrects a typographical error in the subsection citation.
-
Section 45-632
AND WHO USES WATER, OTHER THAN STORED WATER, WITHDRAWN FROM A NON-EXEMPT NONEXEMPT WELL IN THE SANTA CRUZ ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREARemoves redundant phrasing related to water usage reporting.
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Victoria Steele · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1022?
- SB 1022 is sponsored by Victoria Steele.
- What is the current status of SB 1022?
- This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1022?
- Track SB 1022 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1022
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1022
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →