SB 1027 — informed consent; pelvic examinations.
Last action — DP
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
36 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 1027 now clarifies that a pelvic examination can be conducted for three specific reasons: if it's necessary for medical diagnosis, if it’s a forensic examination requested by law enforcement, or if it’s needed to secure evidence in a criminal case. This change is important because it ensures that patients are protected by informed consent while also recognizing the critical purpose of pelvic exams in legal situations. By specifying these conditions, the bill aims to balance medical needs with victims' rights and protections.
SB1027 - 542R - S-HealthS andVer Human Services-Proposed Senate Engrossed Fifty-fourth Legislature HealthState andof HumanArizona ServicesSenate Fifty-fourth Legislature Second Regular Session Session S.B. SENATE BILL 1027 AN ACT Amending title 32, chapter 32, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 32-3228;
relating PROPOSEDto SENATEinformed AMENDMENTSconsent. TO S.B.
1027 (Reference to(TEXT printedOF bill)BILL BEGINS PageON 1,NEXT linePAGE) 13, strikeBe "either"it insertenacted "meetsby onethe Legislature of the following"State Afterof lineArizona: 18, insert:
"3. isSection 1. Title requested32, bychapter law32, enforcementarticle and1, performedArizona pursuantRevised toStatutes, sectionis 13-1414."amended Amendby titleadding tosection conform32-3228, to read: HEATHER CARTER 01/21/2020 03:10 PM S:
CRS/kjaSTART_STATUTE32-3228. Unprofessional conduct;
informed consent;
pelvic examinations It is an act of unprofessional conduct for a physician who is licensed pursuant to chapter 13 or 17 of this title, a nurse practitioner who is licensed pursuant to chapter 15 of this title or a physician assistant who is licensed pursuant to chapter 25 of this title to perform or supervise an individual who performs a pelvic examination on an anesthetized or unconscious patient without first obtaining the patient's informed consent to the pelvic examination, unless the performance of the pelvic examination meets one of the following:
1. Is within the scope of the surgical procedure or diagnostic examination to be performed on the patient for which informed consent has otherwise been obtained.
2. In the case of an unconscious patient, is required for diagnostic purposes and is medically necessary.
3. is a forensic medical examination requested by law enforcement arising out of the need to secure evidence that a person has been the victim of a criminal offense in title 13, chapter 14.END_STATUTE
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current html
- SENATE - Health and Human Services View text html
- HOUSE - Health & Human Services - Strike Everything View text html
- Amended SENATE - Carter flr amend (ref HHS) adopted html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Heather Carter · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Eddie Farnsworth | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Heather Carter | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tony Navarrete | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1027?
- SB 1027 is sponsored by Heather Carter.
- What is the current status of SB 1027?
- This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1027?
- Track SB 1027 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1027
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1027
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →