ignition interlock device; incarceration credits
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1502 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1502.
You're tracking SB 1502
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1502 — ignition interlock device; incarceration credits
Last action — signed by governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
7 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 1502 has been updated to include a new chapter that officially records its approval by the governor on March 29, 2018. This addition marks an important step in the legislative process, signifying that the bill is now formally recognized and enacted into law. The removal of the earlier bill version line suggests a streamlining of the document for clarity and accuracy. These changes matter because they help ensure that the law is clear and up-to-date in official records.
SB1502Chapter 0109 - 532R - S Ver of SB1502 Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER SENATE BILL 1502 AN ACT amending section 28‑3319, Arizona Revised Statutes;
END_STATUTE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MARCH 29, 2018.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MARCH 29, 2018.
View plain text versions (3)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the ignition interlock device requirements by specifying conditions under which the department may defer the time a person must have the device installed in their vehicle.
-
Section 28-3319
The department shall defer the remainder of the time period prescribed in subsection D, paragraph 1, subdivision (a) of this section commencing with the later of six months from the date the interlock was installed or the completion of the requirements of this subsection if all of the following apply: 1. The person is sentenced pursuant to section 28‑1381, subsection I. 2. The person successfully completes an alcohol education program consisting of at least sixteen hours pursuant to section 28‑1381. 3. The person has maintained a functioning ignition interlock device on all motor vehicles the person operates and has met the requirements of section 28‑1461. 4. The person has not attempted to operate a vehicle with an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more two or more times during the period of license restriction or limitation. 5. At the time of the offense, the person was not involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in physical injury or property damage. 6. All necessary compliance information has been provided to the department by the ignition interlock device provider, the alcohol screening program and the alcohol education program.
This addition establishes criteria for deferring the ignition interlock device requirement for certain individuals.
-
Section 28-3319
The deferment pursuant to subsection G of this section is permanent, unless the person is arrested for a violation of section 28‑1381, 28‑1382 or 28‑1383 that occurs during the period of the deferment. If the person is arrested as described in this subsection, the department shall revoke the deferment and require the person to complete the remainder of the time period prescribed in subsection D, paragraph 1, subdivision (a) of this section.
This addition stipulates that the deferment can be revoked if the individual is arrested for relevant offenses during the deferment period.
-
Section 28-3319
I.→ I. J.This change updates the subsection numbering to accommodate the new provisions added.
Action History
-
signed by governor
-
transmit to governor
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
house placed on consent calendar
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
Sponsors
- Steve Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 18% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Judy Burges | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Robert Meza | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Yea |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1502?
- SB 1502 is sponsored by Steve Smith.
- What is the current status of SB 1502?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1502?
- Track SB 1502 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1502
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1502
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →