S 4489 — Authorizes municipalities to lower speed limits in historic districts.*
Last action — REP/SCA 2RS
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill allows municipalities to lower speed limits in historic districts without requiring traffic investigations.
This bill enables local governments to set lower speed limits in areas designated as historic districts without needing to conduct traffic studies first. This change aims to streamline the process for municipalities.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families in historic districts might benefit from safer streets due to lower speed limits.
Summary
Speed limit, historic dist-auth municipalities, lower w/o traffic investigation
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current html June 23, 2026
Action History
-
REP/SCA 2RS
-
INT 1RS REF STR
Sponsors
- Latham Tiver · Cosponsor
- Troy Singleton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Singleton, Troy Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Tiver, Latham
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burzichelli, John J. | Democrat | Yea |
| Diegnan Jr., Patrick J. | Democrat | Yea |
| Mukherji, Raj | Democrat | Yea |
| Timberlake, Britnee N. | Democrat | Yea |
| Holzapfel, James W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tiver, Latham | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 4489 do?
- Speed limit, historic dist-auth municipalities, lower w/o traffic investigation
- Who sponsors S 4489?
- S 4489 is sponsored by Tiver, Latham and Singleton, Troy (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 4489?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 4489?
- Track S 4489 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 4489
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 4489
Last checked for changes 5 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →