S 3522 — Establishes "Privacy Protection Act"; concerns collection and sharing of certain personal information.
Last action — SUB BY
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
3 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (10 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Privacy Protection Act-concerns collection & sharing of certain personal info
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
55 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill S 3522 include the addition of language that specifies the sharing of information to law enforcement agencies under certain conditions, such as for the purpose of a criminal investigation. This change clarifies that receiving agencies must certify that the information will be used appropriately. Additionally, the references to immigration enforcement and injunctive relief were removed, which may affect how this bill relates to those topics. This matters because it narrows the scope of information sharing and the associated legal contexts.
S3522 1R2R [First[Second Reprint] SENATE, No.
Senators Stack, Greenstein, Cruz-Perez, McKnight, CryanCryan, Diegnan and DiegnanTurner SYNOPSIS Establishes “Privacy Protection Act”;
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT As reportedamended by the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 19,24, 2026,2026. with amendments.
4. (New section) 1a.1 A government entity shall not request or collect information from an individual 1or a non-governmental entity1 relating to a person’s immigration status, citizenship status, place of birth, social security number, or individual taxpayer identification number, except when this information is necessary to assess eligibility for, or to 1provide or1 administer, a 1[requested]1 public service, benefit, program, or professional qualifications2[qualifications and licensurelicensure] qualification or license2 1, or as otherwise required by State law1. 1b. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit or in any way restrict any action where the prohibition, restriction, or enforcement would be contrary to federal law, including 8 U.S.C.
s.1644, a judicial order, or a judicial warrant.1 5. (New section) a. Any record or information, whether written or oral, 1[concerning a person] relating to a person’s immigration status, citizenship status, place of birth, social security number, or individual taxpayer identification number1 that is solicited, made, or kept to assess eligibility for, or to 2provide or2 administer a 2public2 service, benefit, program, or professional 1[qualifications and licensure] qualification or license1 that is requested, used, or delivered shall not be considered a governmental record pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), known commonly as the open public records act, and shall not be disclosed, except:
(a) to another government entity 1or2[1or law enforcement agency1agency1]2 when permitted by law 1,2[1, provided that the record or information shall not be used for federal civil immigration enforcement purposes1purposes1]2 ;;
or2[or]2 (c) pursuant to the provisions of subsection c.
of this section. (2) For purposes of this subsection, a government entity’s use of a third-party automated license plate recognition system vendor or service 1[for its own data storage purposes]1 shall not be considered the sale, sharing, or transfer of automated license plate recognition information, provided that the vendor or service not sell, share, transfer, or make searchable to other entities or persons 1automated license plate recognition1 information 1[without the] unless the vendor or service meets the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection and receives1 authorization 1[of] from1 the government entity. c. This section shall not prohibit the disclosure of any record or information when the person to whom the record or information pertains has knowingly provided written consent for the disclosure 1[in the person’s language of choice] . A government entity may develop and make publicly available a standardized written consent form that shall constitute a vital document pursuant to section 2 of; P.L.2023, c.263 (C.52:14-41)1. Written consent shall include:
or (d) to a law enforcement agency of another jurisdiction for the purpose of a criminal investigation, provided that the receiving law enforcement agency certifies, electronically or in writing, to the government entity sharing the information that:
(i) the information shall not be used for any purpose related to civil immigration enforcement;
(ii) the information shall not be shared, sold, transferred, or made searchable by the receiving law enforcement agency;
and (iii) the receiving agency is bound by the same restrictions, use limitations, and data security requirements applicable to the government entity under New Jersey law and in accordance with any regulations and protocols established by the New Jersey State Police and directives or guidance issued by the Attorney General of New Jersey2 .
(2) 2(a) Any agreement executed pursuant to subparagraph (d) of paragraph (1) of subsection b.
of this section shall be considered a governmental record pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), known commonly as the open public records act. (b) If it is found that a law enforcement agency of another jurisdiction has used or shared automated license plate recognition information in violation of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) or any agreement executed pursuant to subparagraph (d) of paragraph (1) of subsection b.
of this section, the Attorney General may, by order, prohibit the sharing of automated license plate recognition information with that law enforcement agency or deny access to the government entity.
(3)2 For purposes of this subsection, a government entity’s use of a third-party automated license plate recognition system vendor or service 1[for its own data storage purposes]1 shall not be considered the sale, sharing, or transfer of automated license plate recognition information, provided that the vendor or service not sell, share, transfer, or make searchable to other entities or persons 1automated license plate recognition1 information 1[without the] unless the vendor or service meets the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection and receives1 authorization 1[of] from1 the government entity. c. This section shall not prohibit the disclosure of any record or information when the person to whom the record or information pertains has knowingly provided written consent for the disclosure 1[in the person’s language of choice] . A government entity may develop and make publicly available a standardized written consent form that shall constitute a vital document pursuant to section 2 of P.L.2023, c.263 (C.52:14-41)1. Written consent shall include:
Action History
-
SUB BY
-
SA 2RS
-
REP/SCA 2RS
-
INT 1RS REF SJU
Sponsors
- John F. McKeon · Primary
- Andrew Zwicker · Primary
- M. Teresa Ruiz · Primary
- Shirley K. Turner · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Diegnan Jr. · Cosponsor
- Joseph P. Cryan · Cosponsor
- Angela V. McKnight · Cosponsor
- Nilsa I. Cruz-Perez · Cosponsor
- Linda R. Greenstein · Cosponsor
- Brian P. Stack · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- McKeon, John F. Democrat
- Zwicker, Andrew Democrat
- Ruiz, M. Teresa Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Turner, Shirley K. Democrat
- Diegnan Jr., Patrick J. Democrat
- Cryan, Joseph P. Democrat
- McKnight, Angela V. Democrat
- Cruz-Perez, Nilsa I. Democrat
- Greenstein, Linda R. Democrat
- Stack, Brian P. Democrat
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 23 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burgess, Renee C. | Democrat | Yea |
| Gopal, Vin | Democrat | Yea |
| Lagana, Joseph A. | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarlo, Paul A. | Democrat | Yea |
| Singleton, Troy | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Bob | Democrat | Yea |
| Stack, Brian P. | Democrat | Yea |
| Bramnick, Jon M. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bucco, Anthony M. | Republican | Nay |
| Corrado, Kristin M. | Republican | Nay |
| Testa Jr., Michael L. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 3522 do?
- Privacy Protection Act-concerns collection & sharing of certain personal info
- Who sponsors S 3522?
- S 3522 is sponsored by McKeon, John F. (Democrat), Zwicker, Andrew (Democrat), Ruiz, M. Teresa (Democrat), Turner, Shirley K. (Democrat), Diegnan Jr., Patrick J. (Democrat), Cryan, Joseph P. (Democrat), McKnight, Angela V. (Democrat), Cruz-Perez, Nilsa I. (Democrat), Greenstein, Linda R. (Democrat), and Stack, Brian P. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 3522?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 3522?
- Track S 3522 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 3522
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 3522
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →