New Jersey 222nd Legislature Status: Introduced 7 D cosponsors

A 4801 — Establishes certain protections against demand by large-load addition customers in State.

Last action — R/S REF SEG

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed General Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced March 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    3 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill establishes protections for large-load customers against demand charges.

This bill provides certain protections to large-load addition customers, likely relating to how they are charged for demand. It aims to ensure fairness in their billing practices.

Summary

Large-load addition costomers-establish certain protections against demand

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

65 added · 87 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended bill clarifies the definition of "large-load addition customer" to refer specifically to an individual addition of load at or above 50 MW, and it allows for an alternative megawatt threshold to be set by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities. Additionally, the amendment has removed the reference to "PJM Interconnection, L.L.C." and "reliability backstop procurement" from the definitions. These changes streamline the definitions and provide flexibility in how large-load additions are determined, which could affect how utilities plan and implement energy solutions in the state.

→
Previous
Latest
A4801 ASSEMBLY, No.
A4801 1R [First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No.
DEANGELO District 14 (Mercer and Middlesex)         SYNOPSIS      Establishes certain protections against demand by large-load addition customers in State.
DEANGELO District 14 (Mercer and Middlesex)   Co-Sponsored by:
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As introduced.
Assemblymen Kearney, Bhalla, Assemblywoman Swain and Assemblyman Tully         SYNOPSIS      Establishes certain protections against demand by large-load addition customers in State.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As reported by the Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee on June 4, 2026, with amendments.
       1.    As used in P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill):       “Board” means the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities or a successor agency.
        1.   As used in P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill):        “Board” means the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities or a successor agency.
     “Electric public utility” means the same as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51).
      “Electric public utility” means the same as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51).
     “Large-load addition customer” means individual additions of load at or above 50 MW at a single point of interconnection.
      “Large-load addition customer” means 1an1 individual 1[additions] addition1 of load at or above 50 MW 1[at a single point of interconnection] or an alternative MW threshold set by the board pursuant to section 5 of P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill)1.
     “Load-serving entity” means an entity, or the duly-designated agent of the entity, including a load aggregator or power marketer, that serves end-users within the State and is authorized to sell electric energy to end-users located within the State.
      “Load-serving entity” means an entity, or the duly-designated agent of the entity, including a load aggregator or power marketer, that serves end-users within the State and is authorized to sell electric energy to end-users located within the State.  1“Load-serving entity” includes a large-load addition customer serving as the large-load addition customer’s own load-serving entity.1       “PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.” or “PJM” means the same as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51).
     “PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.” or “PJM” means the same as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51).
      “Reliability 1[backstop]1 procurement” means a PJM-approved mechanism to procure long-term 1[contracts] commitments1 from new capacity resources, however constituted, 1that are1 deemed necessary to ensure electric system reliability 1[during periods when market-based outcomes are insufficient to meet forecasted needs]1.
     “Reliability backstop procurement” means a PJM-approved mechanism to procure long-term contracts from new capacity resources, however constituted, deemed necessary to ensure electric system reliability during periods when market-based outcomes are insufficient to meet forecasted needs.
        2.   When issued a curtailment obligation or directive from PJM due to a load-serving entity’s 1or an electric public utility’s1 provision of service to a large-load addition customer, the load-serving entity 1or electric public utility1 shall impose PJM’s curtailment obligation or directive solely on the load-serving entity’s 1or electric public utility’s1 large-load addition customers 1, as appropriate1.  However, nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a load-serving entity 1or an electric public utility1 from taking necessary action to maintain system reliability and adopting voluntary load curtailment programs.
       2.    When issued a curtailment obligation or directive from PJM due to a load-serving entity’s provision of service to a large-load addition customer, the load-serving entity shall impose PJM’s curtailment obligation or directive solely on the load-serving entity’s large-load addition customers.  However, nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a load-serving entity from taking necessary action to maintain system reliability and adopting voluntary load curtailment programs.
        3.   Any financial or other obligation associated with 1[the] a1 reliability 1[backstop]1 procurement, or other comparable assignment of long-term capacity obligations, that is assigned to a load-serving entity 1or an electric public utility1 shall be passed through 1or allocated1 to large-load addition customers under substantially-similar terms as PJM assigns the financial or other obligations to the load-serving entity 1or electric public utility1.
       3.    Any financial or other obligation associated with the reliability backstop procurement, or other comparable assignment of long-term capacity obligations, that is assigned to a load-serving entity shall be passed through to large-load addition customers under substantially-similar terms as PJM assigns the financial or other obligations to the load-serving entity.
        4.   In order to receive electric public utility service from an electric public utility in the State, a large-load addition customer shall:  provide appropriate financial security 1,1 in a manner approved by the board, to 1[either]1 the load serving entity 1[or] , PJM,1 the electric public utility, 1or other entity,1 as appropriate, to ensure that costs associated with 1a1 reliability 1[backstop]1 procurement are not passed through to other New Jersey customers, 1even1 if the large-load addition customer’s demand on the electrical grid 1[necessitates reliability backstop procurement through PJM] does not fully materialize over the term of the reliability procurement commitment1 ;
       4.    In order to receive electric public utility service from an electric public utility in the State, a large-load addition customer shall:  provide appropriate financial security in a manner approved by the board, to either the load serving entity or the electric public utility, as appropriate, to ensure that costs associated with reliability backstop procurement are not passed through to other New Jersey customers, if the large-load addition customer’s demand on the electrical grid necessitates reliability backstop procurement through PJM;
       5.    The board shall, in accordance with the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement the provisions of this act, including the form of the appropriate financial security pursuant to section 4 of P.L.    , c.     (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill).
       5.    The board shall, in accordance with the “Administrative Procedure Act,” P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement the provisions of 1[this act] P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill)1, including 1rules and regulations determining an alternative MW threshold for large-load addition customers and1 the form of the appropriate financial security pursuant to section 4 of P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill).
    STATEMENT        This bill prohibits certain costs and obligations related to the large load addition customers from being passed to non-large load addition customers.
     The regional grid operator for the State, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
or PJM, has been developing options for new load customers whose electricity demand can be curtailed in times of system need.  Further, PJM has engaged stakeholders in a proposal for creating a reliability backstop procurement auction that is to procure long-term energy contracts from new capacity resources.
     Under the bill, when issued a curtailment obligation or directive from PJM due to a load-serving entity’s provision of service to a large-load addition customer, the load-serving entity is required to impose PJM’s curtailment obligation or directive solely on the load-serving entity’s large-load addition customers.  However, the bill does not prevent a load-serving entity from taking necessary action to maintain system reliability and adopting voluntary load curtailment programs.
     Additionally, the bill requires any financial or other obligation associated with reliability backstop procurement, or other comparable assignment of long-term capacity obligations, that is assigned to a load-serving entity to be passed through to large-load addition customers under substantially-similar terms as PJM assigns the financial or other obligations to the load-serving entity.
     Finally, under the bill, in order to receive electric public utility service in the State, a large-load addition customer is required to:  (1) provide appropriate financial security to either the load serving entity or the electric public utility, as appropriate, to ensure that costs associated with reliability backstop procurement are not passed through to other New Jersey customers, if the large-load addition customer’s demand on the electrical grid necessitates reliability backstop procurement through PJM;
and (2) submit detailed information to PJM as outlined in the bill.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. R/S REF SEG

  2. PA

  3. REP/ACA 2RA

  4. INT 1RA REF ATU

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (113)

113 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 113 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Floor vote

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 56000
Republican 21001
Unaffiliated 2000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Azzariti Jr., John V. — Yea
Donlon, Margie — Yea
Abdelaziz, Al Democrat Yea
Angelozzi, Anthony Democrat Yea
Bagolie, Rosaura Democrat Yea
Bailey Jr., David Democrat Yea
Bhalla, Ravi S. Democrat Yea
Brennan, Katie Democrat Yea
Calabrese, Clinton Democrat Yea
Carter, Linda S. Democrat Yea
Collazos-Gill, Alixon Democrat Yea
Coughlin, Craig J. Democrat Yea
Danielsen, Joe Democrat Yea
DeAngelo, Wayne P. Democrat Yea
Drulis, Mitchelle Democrat Yea
Egan, Kevin P. Democrat Yea
Freiman, Roy Democrat Yea
Greenwald, Louis D. Democrat Yea
Haider, Shama A. Democrat Yea
Hutchison, Dan Democrat Yea
Kane, Melinda Democrat Yea
Karabinchak, Robert J. Democrat Yea
Katz, Andrea Democrat Yea
Kearney, Vincent M. Democrat Yea
Kennedy, James J. Democrat Yea
Lopez, Yvonne Democrat Yea
Macurdy, Andrew Democrat Yea
McCoy, Tennille R. Democrat Yea
Miller, Cody D. Democrat Yea
Moen Jr., William F. Democrat Yea
Morales, Carmen Theresa Democrat Yea
Murphy, Carol A. Democrat Yea
Onyema, Chigozie U. Democrat Yea
Park, Ellen J. Democrat Yea
Peterpaul Esq., Luanne M. Democrat Yea
Pintor Marin, Eliana Democrat Yea
Quijano, Annette Democrat Yea
Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina Democrat Yea
Rodriguez, Ed Democrat Yea
Rodriguez, Gabriel Democrat Yea
Rowan, Maureen Democrat Yea
Sampson IV, William B. Democrat Yea
Schaer, Gary S. Democrat Yea
Schnall, Alexander Democrat Yea
Simmons, Heather Democrat Yea
Singh, Balvir Democrat Yea
Spearman, William W. Democrat Yea
Speight, Shanique Democrat Yea
Stanley, Sterley S. Democrat Yea
Stewart, Kenyatta Democrat Yea
Swain, Lisa Democrat Yea
Sweeney, Marisa Democrat Yea
Tucker, Cleopatra G. Democrat Yea
Tully, Chris Democrat Yea
Venezia, Michael Democrat Yea
Verrelli, Anthony S. Democrat Yea
Wainstein, Larry Democrat Yea
Walker, Jerry Democrat Yea
Auth, Robert Republican Yea
Barlas, Al Republican Yea
Bergen, Brian Republican Yea
Clifton, Robert D. Republican Yea
DePhillips, Christopher P. Republican Yea
DiMaio, John Republican Yea
Dunn, Aura K. Republican Yea
Fantasia, Dawn Republican Yea
Flynn, Victoria A. Republican Yea
Guardian, Donald A. Republican Yea
Inganamort, Michael Republican Yea
Kanitra, Paul Republican Yea
Kean, Sean T. Republican Yea
McClellan, Antwan L. Republican Yea
McGuckin, Gregory P. Republican Yea
Myhre, Gregory E. Republican Yea
Peterson, Erik Republican Yea
Rumpf, Brian E. Republican Yea
Sauickie, Alex Republican Not Voting
Scharfenberger, Gerry Republican Yea
Simonsen, Erik K. Republican Yea
Webber, Jay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Committee vote — ATU

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 2001
Total 9001
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Bailey Jr., David Democrat Yea
DeAngelo, Wayne P. Democrat Yea
Egan, Kevin P. Democrat Yea
Karabinchak, Robert J. Democrat Yea
Katz, Andrea Democrat Yea
Spearman, William W. Democrat Yea
Walker, Jerry Democrat Yea
Barlas, Al Republican Not Voting
Kanitra, Paul Republican Yea
Sauickie, Alex Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does A 4801 do?
Large-load addition costomers-establish certain protections against demand
Who sponsors A 4801?
A 4801 is sponsored by Bailey Jr., David (Democrat), Katz, Andrea (Democrat), DeAngelo, Wayne P. (Democrat), Kearney, Vincent M. (Democrat), Bhalla, Ravi S. (Democrat), Swain, Lisa (Democrat), and Tully, Chris (Democrat).
What is the current status of A 4801?
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced March 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track A 4801?
Track A 4801 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on A 4801

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of A 4801

Last checked for changes 9 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →