A 3967 — Requires BPU to work with neighboring states to research and recommend certain action concerning electric capacity and transmission.
Last action — REP/ACA REF AAP
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed General Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
3 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Electric capacity & transmission-research and recommend certain action
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
16 added · 46 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill now specifies that the Board of Public Utilities must submit its report to the Governor and the Legislature within one year of the bill's effective date, rather than by December 31, 2025. Additionally, the reference to "PJM Interconnection, L.L.C." has been changed to better reflect its full title. These changes clarify the timeline for reporting and ensure that the entity's name is accurately presented.
A3967 1R [First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT IntroducedAs Pendingreported Technicalby Reviewthe byAssembly LegislativeTelecommunications Counsel.and Utilities Committee on March 16, 2026, with amendments.
or (3) withdraw from the regional, high-voltage electric transmission grid operated or1[or] and1 managed by PJM Interconnection,1[Interconnection, L.L.C.L.L.C.]1 and: (a) establish an independent electric transmission grid;
and: or (a) (b) establishjoin an independentexisting electric transmission grid;grid that operates within another state or region. b. 1[No later than December 31, 2025] Within one year of the effective date of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill)1, the board shall submit a report to the Governor, and to the Legislature pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), that includes the board’s findings and recommendations as required pursuant to subsection a.
or (b) join an existing electric transmission grid that operates within another state or region. b. No later than December 31, 2025, the board shall submit a report to the Governor, and to the Legislature pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), that includes the board’s findings and recommendations as required pursuant to subsection a.
STATEMENT This bill requires the Board of Public Utilities (board) to work collaboratively with neighboring states to research and recommend collective action to: (1) require any electric load serving entity in New Jersey to demonstrate to the board that it has contracted for at least 80 percent of the capacity needed to serve its load on a bilateral basis for at least five years into the future;
(2) withdraw from PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.’s (PJM) capacity market and either develop a multi-state compact to engage in the fixed resource requirement alternative to secure electric capacity through contracts with private entities, competitive capacity auctions, or some combination thereof, or (3) withdraw from the regional, high-voltage electric transmission grid operated by or managed by PJM and either establish an independent electric transmission grid or join an existing electric transmission grid. PJM’s capacity market operates through competitive auctions to procure capacity for future delivery years. However, issues with PJM’s interconnection process have delayed new energy generation, which reduces competition. Backlogs to PJM’s interconnection queue undermine one of the goals of the capacity auction, which is to incentivize developers to bring more generation to the electrical grid. Further, the Organization of PJM States, Inc., of which the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities is a member, and the Independent Market Monitor for PJM have found flaws in the PJM capacity market, which they claim have led to capacity auction clearing prices that fail to reflect supply and demand. In July 2024, PJM’s capacity auction for the 2025/2026 Delivery Year had clearing prices almost 10 times the prices from the previous auction. The increase in capacity clearing prices will result in $14.7 billion in costs to consumers, up from $2.2 billion from the prior delivery year. This result represents the highest capacity prices in the history of PJM’s capacity auction.
PJM’s actions are resulting in increased costs and decreased affordability for ratepayers. And, PJM has not adequately addressed concerns about the impact of rate increases on ratepayers or been responsive to State energy policies. The Legislature therefore determines that it is in the best interest of the residents of New Jersey to work in collaboration with other states to explore alternative options to PJM’s capacity auction for securing the capacity necessary for grid reliability.
Action History
-
REP/ACA REF AAP
-
INT 1RA REF ATU
Sponsors
- Chris Tully · Cosponsor
- Heather Simmons · Cosponsor
- William B. Sampson IV · Cosponsor
- Lisa Swain · Primary
- David Bailey Jr. · Primary
- Robert J. Karabinchak · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Swain, Lisa Democrat
- Bailey Jr., David Democrat
- Karabinchak, Robert J. Democrat
Co-sponsors (3)
- Tully, Chris Democrat
- Simmons, Heather Democrat
- Sampson IV, William B. Democrat
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey Jr., David | Democrat | Yea |
| DeAngelo, Wayne P. | Democrat | Yea |
| Egan, Kevin P. | Democrat | Yea |
| Karabinchak, Robert J. | Democrat | Yea |
| Katz, Andrea | Democrat | Yea |
| Spearman, William W. | Democrat | Yea |
| Walker, Jerry | Democrat | Yea |
| Barlas, Al | Republican | Nay |
| Myhre, Gregory E. | Republican | Nay |
| Sauickie, Alex | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does A 3967 do?
- Electric capacity & transmission-research and recommend certain action
- Who sponsors A 3967?
- A 3967 is sponsored by Tully, Chris (Democrat), Simmons, Heather (Democrat), Sampson IV, William B. (Democrat), Swain, Lisa (Democrat), Bailey Jr., David (Democrat), and Karabinchak, Robert J. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of A 3967?
- This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track A 3967?
- Track A 3967 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on A 3967
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of A 3967
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →