Virginia 2026 Session Status: Introduced

SB339 — SCC; cost allocation proceedings for certain electric utilities, definitions.

Last action — Continued from last session

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill addresses cost allocation processes for specific electric utilities.

The bill aims to create definitions and procedures for cost allocation proceedings related to certain electric utilities. This ensures clarity and consistency in how costs are shared among these utilities.

What this means for you
  • Consumers: This bill may influence how electricity costs are shared, potentially affecting your utility rates.
  • Small Business: Changes in cost allocation for electric utilities might impact your energy expenses.

Summary

SCC; cost allocation proceedings for certain electric utilities, definitions.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read SB339 on the official Virginia source →

Action History

  1. H Continued to next session in Labor and Commerce (Voice Vote)

  2. H Placed on Labor and Commerce Agenda

  3. H Subcommittee recommends continuing to (Voice Vote)

  4. H House subcommittee offered

  5. H Placed on Labor and Commerce Agenda

  6. S Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (SB339)

  7. H Assigned HCL sub: Subcommittee #3

  8. H Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce

  9. H Read first time

  10. H Placed on Calendar

  11. S Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N 0-A)

  12. S Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute (Voice Vote)

  13. S Committee substitute agreed to (Voice Vote)

  14. S Read second time

  15. S Passed by for the day

  16. S Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading) (35-Y 0-N 0-A)

  17. S Rules suspended

  18. S Committee substitute printed 26107935D-S1

  19. S Reported from Commerce and Labor with substitute (14-Y 1-N)

  20. S Senate committee offered

  21. S Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (SB339)

  22. S Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor

  23. S Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26104824D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35005
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 40000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)

Official roll call →

Passed 14 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14100
Total 14100
% of votes cast 93%7%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Aaron R. Rouse — Yea
Adam P. Ebbin — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
David W. Marsden — Nay
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Lamont Bagby — Yea
Mamie E. Locke — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB339 do?
SCC; cost allocation proceedings for certain electric utilities, definitions.
Who sponsors SB339?
SB339 is sponsored by Russet Perry.
What is the current status of SB339?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB339?
Track SB339 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB339

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB339

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →