Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 4 R cosponsors

SB 626 — Relating to: police authority to disable drones threatening public safety and providing a penalty.

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 13 sponsors

    1 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

An Act to renumber and amend 114.045; to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 31 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Senate Bill 626 clarify the actions that law enforcement can take regarding drones that pose a credible threat to public safety. The bill specifies that officers can detect, track, and disrupt drone operations without prior consent and enhances penalties for operating weaponized drones near sensitive locations. This matters because it aims to improve public safety by giving law enforcement clearer powers to manage potentially dangerous drone activities, especially during large events or near critical infrastructure.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa1208/1 ZDW:cdc SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 626 February 27, 2026 - Offered by SenatRADLEY.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-5198/1 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 626 November 14, 2025 - Introduced by Senators RADLEY, JACQUE, M ARKLEIN and N ASS, cosponsored by Representatives W ICHGERS, BEHNKE , D ITTRICH, G OEBEN , KNODL, K URTZ, M ELOTIK, M URPHY and M URSAU .
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
A N A CT to renumber and amend 114.045;
to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;
relating to:
police authority to disable drones threatening public safety and providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill provides that a law enforcement officer may do any of the following to mitigate the threat posed by a drone that the officer reasonably suspects poses an imminent threat to public safety:
1) detect, track, and identify the drone;
and 2) intercept, disable, or destroy the drone through any lawful method, including jamming, hacking, or physically capturing the drone.
The bill provides that neither the law enforcement officer nor the agency that employs them is financially liable for damage to or loss of a drone that is intercepted, disabled, or destroyed.
Under current law, no person may operate a drone over a correctional institution without the express permission of the secretary of corrections.
A person who violates this prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of $5,000.
This bill provides that a person who violates this prohibition by use of a weaponized drone, the use of which poses a threat to public safety, is guilty of a Class H felony.
“Weaponized drone” is defined to mean a drone equipped with a taser, firearm, flamethrower, chemical, or explosive device.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5198/1 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 626 SECTION 1 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
114.045 of the statutes is renumbered 114.045 (2m) and amended to read:
114.045 (2m) (a) No person may operate a drone, as defined in s.
941.292 (1), over a correctional institution, as defined in s.
801.02 (7) (a) 1., including any grounds of the institution, except that a person may operate a drone over an institution that is a state facility with the express authorization of the secretary of corrections or his or her designee or over an institution that is a county facility with the express authorization of the sheriff of the county or his or her designee.
(b) Any person who violates sub.
(1) par.
(a) may be required to forfeit not more than $5,000.
(c) A law enforcement officer investigating an alleged violation of sub.
(1) par.
(a) shall seize and transfer to the department of corrections or authority in charge of the correctional institution any photograph, motion picture, other visual representation, or data that represents a visual image that was created or recorded by a drone during an alleged violation of sub.
(1) par.
(a).
S ECTION 2.
114.045 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
114.045 (1m) In this section:
(a) “Drone” has the meaning given in s.
941.292 (1).
(b) “Law enforcement officer” has the meaning given in s.
165.85 (2) (c).
(c) “Weaponized drone” means a drone that is equipped with a taser, firearm, flamethrower, chemical, or explosive device.
S ECTION 3.
114.045 (2m) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-5198/1 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 626 SECTION 3 114.045 (2m) (bm) Any person who violates par.
(a) by use of a weaponized drone, the use of which poses a threat to public safety, is guilty of a Class H felony.
Show all 63 changed rows (23 more)
Previous
Latest
S ECTION 4.
114.045 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:
114.045 (3m) (a) A law enforcement officer may do any of the following to mitigate the threat posed by a drone that the law enforcement officer reasonably suspects poses an imminent threat to public safety:
Page 1, line 3:
Detect, track, and identify the drone.
delete that line and substitute “act to mitigate the threat posed by certain drones and providing a penalty.”.
Page 3, line 4:
Intercept, disable, or destroy the drone through any lawful method, including jamming, hacking, or physically capturing the drone, if the law enforcement officer reasonably believes that failure to do so would result in a greater threat to public safety than intercepting, disabling, or destroying the drone.
delete lines 4 to 14 and substitute:
(b) Neither the law enforcement officer nor the agency that employs them shall be financially liable for damage to or loss of a drone that is intercepted, disabled, or destroyed under par.
“114.045 (3m) (a) Subject to par.
(a) 2.
(b), a law enforcement officer may take any of the following actions that are necessary to mitigate a credible threat that a drone poses to the safety or security of people, facilities, and assets, a venue or set of venues used for large-scale public gatherings or events, critical infrastructure, or correctional facilities:
(END)
1.
During the operation of the drone, detect, identify, monitor, and track the drone, without prior consent, including by means of intercept or other access of a - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRBa1208/1 ZDW:cdc wire communication, an oral communication, or an electronic communication used to control the drone.
2.
Warn the operator of the drone, including by passive or active, and direct or indirect physical, electronic, radio, and electromagnetic means, and through the use of remote identification broadcast or other means.
3.
Disrupt or disable control of the drone without prior consent.
4.
Seize or exercise control of the drone.
5.
Seize or otherwise confiscate the drone.
6.
Use reasonable force, if necessary, to disable, damage, or destroy the drone.
(b) Paragraph (a) applies only to a law enforcement officer or agency that acts only as authorized by 6 USC 124n, including compliance with training, certification, equipment, and reporting requirements.”.
(END )
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Available for scheduling

  3. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  4. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  5. Executive action taken

  6. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bradley

  7. Senator James added as a coauthor

  8. Public hearing held

  9. Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  10. Introduced by Senators Bradley, Jacque, Marklein and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Wichgers, Behnke, Dittrich, Goeben, Knodl, Kurtz, Melotik, Murphy and Mursau

Sponsors

  • Julian Bradley · Primary
  • André Jacque · Cosponsor
  • Howard Marklein · Cosponsor
  • Steve Nass · Cosponsor
  • Wichgers · Cosponsor
  • Behnke · Cosponsor
  • Dittrich · Cosponsor
  • Goeben · Cosponsor
  • Knodl · Cosponsor
  • Kurtz · Cosponsor
  • Melotik · Cosponsor
  • Murphy · Cosponsor
  • Mursau · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 626 do?
An Act to renumber and amend 114.045; to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 626?
SB 626 is sponsored by Bradley, Julian (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), Wichgers, Behnke, Dittrich, Goeben, Knodl, Kurtz, Melotik, Murphy, and Mursau.
What is the current status of SB 626?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 626?
Track SB 626 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 626

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 626

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →