SB 626 — Relating to: police authority to disable drones threatening public safety and providing a penalty.
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
13 sponsors
1 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 114.045; to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
71 added · 31 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Senate Bill 626 clarify the actions that law enforcement can take regarding drones that pose a credible threat to public safety. The bill specifies that officers can detect, track, and disrupt drone operations without prior consent and enhances penalties for operating weaponized drones near sensitive locations. This matters because it aims to improve public safety by giving law enforcement clearer powers to manage potentially dangerous drone activities, especially during large events or near critical infrastructure.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa1208/1LRB-5198/1 ZDW:cdcZDW:klm SENATE AMENDMENTBILL 1,626 TONovember SENATE14, BILL2025 626- FebruaryIntroduced 27,by 2026Senators -RADLEY, OfferedJACQUE, M ARKLEIN and N ASS, cosponsored by SenatRADLEY.Representatives W ICHGERS, BEHNKE , D ITTRICH, G OEBEN , KNODL, K URTZ, M ELOTIK, M URPHY and M URSAU .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendJudiciary theand billPublic asSafety. follows:
A N A CT to renumber and amend 114.045;
to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;
relating to:
police authority to disable drones threatening public safety and providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill provides that a law enforcement officer may do any of the following to mitigate the threat posed by a drone that the officer reasonably suspects poses an imminent threat to public safety:
1) detect, track, and identify the drone;
and 2) intercept, disable, or destroy the drone through any lawful method, including jamming, hacking, or physically capturing the drone.
The bill provides that neither the law enforcement officer nor the agency that employs them is financially liable for damage to or loss of a drone that is intercepted, disabled, or destroyed.
Under current law, no person may operate a drone over a correctional institution without the express permission of the secretary of corrections.
A person who violates this prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of $5,000.
This bill provides that a person who violates this prohibition by use of a weaponized drone, the use of which poses a threat to public safety, is guilty of a Class H felony.
“Weaponized drone” is defined to mean a drone equipped with a taser, firearm, flamethrower, chemical, or explosive device.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5198/1 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 626 SECTION 1 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
114.045 of the statutes is renumbered 114.045 (2m) and amended to read:
114.045 (2m) (a) No person may operate a drone, as defined in s.
941.292 (1), over a correctional institution, as defined in s.
801.02 (7) (a) 1., including any grounds of the institution, except that a person may operate a drone over an institution that is a state facility with the express authorization of the secretary of corrections or his or her designee or over an institution that is a county facility with the express authorization of the sheriff of the county or his or her designee.
(b) Any person who violates sub.
(1) par.
(a) may be required to forfeit not more than $5,000.
(c) A law enforcement officer investigating an alleged violation of sub.
(1) par.
(a) shall seize and transfer to the department of corrections or authority in charge of the correctional institution any photograph, motion picture, other visual representation, or data that represents a visual image that was created or recorded by a drone during an alleged violation of sub.
(1) par.
(a).
S ECTION 2.
114.045 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
114.045 (1m) In this section:
(a) “Drone” has the meaning given in s.
941.292 (1).
(b) “Law enforcement officer” has the meaning given in s.
165.85 (2) (c).
(c) “Weaponized drone” means a drone that is equipped with a taser, firearm, flamethrower, chemical, or explosive device.
S ECTION 3.
114.045 (2m) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-5198/1 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 626 SECTION 3 114.045 (2m) (bm) Any person who violates par.
(a) by use of a weaponized drone, the use of which poses a threat to public safety, is guilty of a Class H felony.
Show all 63 changed lines (23 more)
S ECTION 4.
114.045 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:
114.045 (3m) (a) A law enforcement officer may do any of the following to mitigate the threat posed by a drone that the law enforcement officer reasonably suspects poses an imminent threat to public safety:
PageDetect, 1,track, lineand 3:identify the drone.
delete that line and substitute “act to mitigate the threat posed by certain drones and providing a penalty.”.
PageIntercept, 3,disable, lineor 4:destroy the drone through any lawful method, including jamming, hacking, or physically capturing the drone, if the law enforcement officer reasonably believes that failure to do so would result in a greater threat to public safety than intercepting, disabling, or destroying the drone.
delete(b) linesNeither 4the law enforcement officer nor the agency that employs them shall be financially liable for damage to 14or andloss substitute:of a drone that is intercepted, disabled, or destroyed under par.
“114.045 (3m) (a) Subject2. to par.
(b),(END) a law enforcement officer may take any of the following actions that are necessary to mitigate a credible threat that a drone poses to the safety or security of people, facilities, and assets, a venue or set of venues used for large-scale public gatherings or events, critical infrastructure, or correctional facilities:
1.
During the operation of the drone, detect, identify, monitor, and track the drone, without prior consent, including by means of intercept or other access of a - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRBa1208/1 ZDW:cdc wire communication, an oral communication, or an electronic communication used to control the drone.
2.
Warn the operator of the drone, including by passive or active, and direct or indirect physical, electronic, radio, and electromagnetic means, and through the use of remote identification broadcast or other means.
3.
Disrupt or disable control of the drone without prior consent.
4.
Seize or exercise control of the drone.
5.
Seize or otherwise confiscate the drone.
6.
Use reasonable force, if necessary, to disable, damage, or destroy the drone.
(b) Paragraph (a) applies only to a law enforcement officer or agency that acts only as authorized by 6 USC 124n, including compliance with training, certification, equipment, and reporting requirements.”.
(END )
Show all 63 changed rows (23 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bradley
-
Senator James added as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Bradley, Jacque, Marklein and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Wichgers, Behnke, Dittrich, Goeben, Knodl, Kurtz, Melotik, Murphy and Mursau
Sponsors
- Julian Bradley · Primary
- André Jacque · Cosponsor
- Howard Marklein · Cosponsor
- Steve Nass · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Goeben · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Kurtz · Cosponsor
- Melotik · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bradley, Julian Republican
Co-sponsors (12)
- Jacque, André Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Wichgers
- Behnke
- Dittrich
- Goeben
- Knodl
- Kurtz
- Melotik
- Murphy
- Mursau
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 626 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 114.045; to create 114.045 (1m), 114.045 (2m) (bm) and 114.045 (3m) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 626?
- SB 626 is sponsored by Bradley, Julian (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), Wichgers, Behnke, Dittrich, Goeben, Knodl, Kurtz, Melotik, Murphy, and Mursau.
- What is the current status of SB 626?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 626?
- Track SB 626 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 626
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 626
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →