AB 380 — Relating to: suspension without pay in cases of judicial misconduct or pending final determination in proceedings involving alleged judicial misconduct or permanent disability.
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 31, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Assembly
Current position in the legislative process.
-
21 sponsors
1 primary, 20 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (16 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
50 added · 15 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill AB 380 clarify the conditions under which a judge can be suspended without pay for misconduct. The changes specify that a suspension without pay can happen in cases of "criminal misconduct" and detail that if a judge is ultimately found not to have engaged in misconduct, they can reclaim back pay from the time of their suspension. This is important as it provides clearer protections for judges while still holding them accountable for their actions.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0422/1LRB-3390/1 JK:cdcKRP:cdc ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 380 SeptemberJuly 29,31, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentatORTWELLRepresentatiORTWELL ., UGUST , LLEN , EHNKE , DITTRICH, D ONOVAN , GOEBEN , GREEN , B.
AtJACOBSON the, locationsK indicated,NODL amend, theKREIBICH, billMAXEY as, follows:MURPHY, O'CONNOR , PENTERMAN and PIWOWARCZYK , cosponsored by Senators OMCZYK , BRADLEY, CABRAL-G UEVARA , ASS and QUINN .
1.Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
PageA 2,N lineA 5:CT to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;
afterrelating XforYto: insert XcriminalY.
2.suspension without pay in cases of judicial misconduct or pending final determination in proceedings involving alleged judicial misconduct or permanent disability.
PageAnalysis 2,by linethe 15:Legislative Reference Bureau The Wisconsin Constitution authorizes the supreme court to reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove for cause or for disability any judge or justice pursuant to procedures established by the legislature by law.
afterUnder XsectionYcurrent insertlaw, Xon the basissupreme ofcourt’s adisciplinary complaintauthority establishingalso probableextends causeto ofcourt criminalcommissioners. misconductY.
3.The Judicial Commission currently is charged with investigating alleged misconduct or permanent disability of a judge, justice, or court commissioner (judge).
PageUnder 2,current linelaw, 15:if the Judicial Commission finds probable cause that a judge has engaged or is engaging in misconduct, it files a formal complaint with the supreme court, and, if the Judicial Commission finds probable cause that a judge has a permanent disability, it files a petition with the supreme court.
afterUnder XpayYcurrent insertlaw, X,after excepta thatformal if,complaint uponor thepetition finalis determinationfiled, of the proceedings, the supreme court imposesmay notemporarily disciplinesuspend ona the judge orpending circuitfinal ordetermination supplemental court commissioner, the judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner is entitled to back pay accrued from the first day of the suspensionproceedings. to the date of the final determinationY.
The supreme court ultimately determines the appropriate discipline or action in each proceeding.
This bill specifies that, if the supreme court imposes a temporary suspension pending final determination of proceedings or imposes a suspension as a disciplinary sanction in a case of misconduct, the suspension must be without pay.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3390/1 KRP:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 380 SECTION 1 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
757.91 of the statutes is amended to read:
757.91 Supreme court;
disposition.
The supreme court shall review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations under s.
757.89 and determine appropriate discipline in cases of misconduct and appropriate action in cases of permanent disabilityIf the supreme court imposes a suspension for misconduct, the suspension shall be without pay.
The rules of the supreme court applicable to civil cases in the supreme court govern the review proceedings under this section.
S ECTION 2.
757.95 of the statutes is amended to read:
757.95 Temporary suspension by supreme court.
The supreme court may, following the filing of a formal complaint or a petition by the commission, prohibit a judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner from exercising the powers of a judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner pending final determination of the proceedingsIf the supreme court imposes a temporary suspension under this section, the suspension shall be without pay.
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 42
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-13-2026 by Committee on Rules
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Sortwell
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 4, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 4, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sortwell
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced by Representatives Sortwell, August, Allen, Behnke, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Murphy, O'Connor, Penterman and Piwowarczyk; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Nass and Quinn
Sponsors
- Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Bradley · Cosponsor
- Cabral-Guevara · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- Quinn · Cosponsor
- Shae Sortwell · Primary
- Tyler August · Cosponsor
- Scott Allen · Cosponsor
- Elijah Behnke · Cosponsor
- Barbara Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Bob Donovan · Cosponsor
- Joy Goeben · Cosponsor
- Chanz Green · Cosponsor
- Brent Jacobson · Cosponsor
- Daniel Knodl · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Dave Maxey · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
- William Penterman · Cosponsor
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on · 41 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Sortwell, Shae Republican
Co-sponsors (20)
- Tomczyk
- Bradley
- Cabral-Guevara
- Nass
- Quinn
- August, Tyler Republican
- Allen, Scott Republican
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Donovan, Bob Republican
- Goeben, Joy Republican
- Green, Chanz Republican
- Jacobson, Brent Republican
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Penterman, William Republican
- Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Yea |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Yea |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 380 do?
- An Act to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 380?
- AB 380 is sponsored by Tomczyk, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Nass, Quinn, Sortwell, Shae (Republican), August, Tyler (Republican), Allen, Scott (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Donovan, Bob (Republican), Goeben, Joy (Republican), Green, Chanz (Republican), Jacobson, Brent (Republican), Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), and Piwowarczyk, Jim (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 380?
- This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 31, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track AB 380?
- Track AB 380 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 380
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 380
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →