Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 7 R cosponsors

AB 377 — Relating to: establishing English as the official state language, use of artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing English language interpreters, and use of English for governmental oral and written communication and for nongovernmental purposes. (FE)

Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Assembly

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

An Act to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.); to create 1.101 of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

129 added · 14 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Assembly Bill 377 clarify important points regarding the use of artificial intelligence for translation in legal settings. One key change specifies that the requirement to use AI translation tools does not apply to hospitals, ensuring that medical contexts are handled with care. Additionally, it stipulates that the bill's provisions regarding translation do not apply to individuals accused of violent crimes, highlighting a consideration for legal due process. These changes matter as they aim to balance the push for an official language with the need for accessibility in sensitive situations.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0555/1 MPG:cdc ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 377 October 30, 2025 - Offered by RepresentatURPHY.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 July 17, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives M URPHY , B EHNKE , BROOKS , GUNDRUM , KREIBICH, MAXEY and O'CONNOR , cosponsored by SenatorACQUE and NASS.
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI.
A N A CT to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.);
to create 1.101 of the statutes;
relating to:
establishing English as the official state language, use of artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing English language interpreters, and use of English for governmental oral and written communication and for nongovernmental purposes.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Currently, Wisconsin has no official language.
This bill provides that the official language of this state is English.
The bill also allows any state or local governmental entity to provide a person with access to artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing an English language interpreter if the entity is authorized or required by law to appoint an interpreter for the person.
Additionally, the bill provides that, unless otherwise specifically required by law, all oral and written communication by all state and local governmental entities must be in the English language, except that such communication may be in another language when appropriate to the circumstances of an individual case, the - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 implementation of a program in a specific instance, or the discharge of a responsibility in a particular situationThe bill also permits state and local government officers and employees to use a language other than English in oral or written communication whenever necessary for one or more of eight specified purposes.
Finally, the bill precludes any state or local governmental entity from prohibiting any person from becoming proficient in any language or restricting the oral or written use of any language for a nongovernmental purpose.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
1.101 of the statutes is created to read:
1.101 Official state language;
use of English in government operations.
(1) DEFINITIONS.
In this section:
(a) “Local governmental unit” means a political subdivision, a special purpose district, an agency or corporation of a political subdivision or special purpose district, a school district, or a combination or subunit of any of the foregoing, in this state.
(b) “Political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
(c) “State agency” means an association, authority, board, department, commission, independent agency, institution, office, society, or other body in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law.
(2) E STABLISHING ENGLISH AS THE OFFICIAL STATE LANGUAGE .
The official language of this state is English.
(3) A LTERNATIVES TO APPOINTMENT OF INTERPRETERS .
If a state agency or local governmental unit is authorized or required by law to appoint an English - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 language interpreter for a person, the state agency or local governmental unit may, in lieu of appointing an interpreter, provide the person with access to artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools.
(4) USE OF ENGLISH IN GOVERNMENTAL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION .
(a) Unless otherwise specifically authorized or required by law and except as authorized in par.
(b), all oral and written communication by all state agencies and local governmental units shall be in the English language, except that such communication may be in another language when appropriate to the circumstances of an individual case, the implementation of a program in a specific instance, or the discharge of a responsibility in a particular situation.
(b) An officer or employee of a state agency or local governmental unit may use a language other than English in oral or written communication whenever necessary for any of the following purposes:
Page 3, line 6:
To protect the health, safety, or liberty of any citizen.
delete Xauthorized in par.
(b)Y and substitute Xprovided in pars.
(b) and (c)Y.
Page 4, line 2:
To teach or study another language.
after that line insert:
X(c) Paragraph (a) does not apply to a hospital, as defined in s.
50.065 (1) (cm).Y.
Page 5, line 15:
To protect the rights of a criminal defendant or victim of a crime.
after X(3)Y insert Xif the person is not a defendant accused of a violent crime, as defined in s.
4.
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
Previous
Latest
969.001 (3)Y.
To promote trade, tourism, or commerce.
END )
5.
To facilitate activities relating to the compilation of any census.
6.
To comply with the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act under 20 USC 1400 et seq.
7.
To use a proper name, term of art, or phrase from a language other than English.
- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 8.
To comply with the constitution and laws of the United States or the constitution of this state.
(5) U SE OF LANGUAGES .
No state agency or local governmental unit may prohibit any person from becoming proficient in any language or restrict the oral or written use of any language for a nongovernmental purpose.
S ECTION 2.
885.37 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.37 (1) If a municipal court has notice that a person who is a juvenile or parent subject to ch.
938, or who is a witness in a proceeding under ch.
938, has a language difficulty because of the inability to speak or understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak, or has a speech defect, the court shall make a factual determination of whether the language difficulty or the hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the individual person from communicating with his or her the person’s attorney, reasonably understanding the English testimony, or reasonably being understood in EnglishIf the court determines that an interpreter is necessary, the court shall advise the person that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the person has a right to a qualified interpreter and that, if the person cannot afford one, an interpreter will be provided for him or her the person at the public’s expense.
Any waiver of the right to an interpreter is effective only if made voluntarily in person, in open court, and on the record.
S ECTION 3.
885.37 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.37 (3) (b) In any administrative contested case proceeding before a state, county, or municipal agency, if the agency conducting the proceeding has notice that a party to the proceeding has a language difficulty because of the inability to speak - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 3 or understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak, or has a speech defect, the agency shall make a factual determination of whether the language difficulty or hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the party from communicating with others, reasonably understanding the English testimony, or reasonably being understood in English.
If the agency determines that an interpreter is necessary, the agency shall advise the party that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the party has a right to a qualified interpreter.
After considering the party’s ability to pay and the other needs of the party, the agency may provide for an interpreter for the party at the public’s expense.
Any waiver of the right to an interpreter is effective only if made at the administrative contested case proceeding.
S ECTION 4.
885.38 (3) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.38 (3) (a) (intro.) If the a court determines that the a person has limited English proficiency and that an interpreter is necessary, the court shall advise the person that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the person has the right to a qualified interpreter at the public’s expense if the person is one any of the following:
(END)
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque

  3. Available for scheduling

  4. Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  5. Executive action taken

  6. Public hearing held

  7. Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  8. Received from Assembly

  9. Ordered immediately messaged

  10. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 45, Paired 2

  11. Rules suspended

  12. Ordered to a third reading

  13. Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  14. Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Read a second time

  16. Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  17. Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules

  18. Referred to committee on Rules

  19. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  20. Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  21. Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  22. Executive action taken

  23. Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Murphy

  24. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy

  25. Public hearing held

  26. Fiscal estimate received

  27. Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI

  28. Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Behnke, Brooks, Gundrum, Kreibich, Maxey and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Nass

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 123 not signed on · 43 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (123)

123 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 123 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Read a third time and passed

Passed 51 Yea · 45 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 50101
Democrat 04200
Unaffiliated 1200
Total 514501
% of votes cast 53%46%0%1%
How each member voted (97)
Member Party Vote
JOHNSON — Nay
MOORE OMOKUNDE — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Arney, Margaret Democrat Nay
Bare, Mike Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Brown, Brienne Democrat Nay
Clancy, Ryan Democrat Nay
Cruz, Angelina Democrat Nay
DeSanto, Karen Democrat Nay
DeSmidt, Ben Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Fitzgerald, Joan Democrat Nay
Goodwin, Russell Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
Hysell, Andrew Democrat Nay
Jacobson, Jenna Democrat Nay
Joers, Alex Democrat Nay
Kirsch, Karen Democrat Nay
Madison, Darrin Democrat Nay
Mayadev, Renuka Democrat Nay
McCarville, Maureen Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Miresse, Vincent Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Nay
Palmeri, Lori Democrat Nay
Phelps, Christian Democrat Nay
Prado, Priscilla Democrat Nay
Roe, Ann Democrat Nay
Sheehan, Joe Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spaude, Ryan Democrat Nay
Stroud, Angela Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Tenorio, Angelito Democrat Nay
Udell, Randy Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brill, Lindee Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Donovan, Bob Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Franklin, Benjamin Republican Yea
Goeben, Joy Republican Yea
Green, Chanz Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Gustafson, Nate Republican Yea
Hurd, Karen Republican Yea
Jacobson, Brent Republican Yea
Kaufert, Dean Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Kreibich, Rob Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Maxey, Dave Republican Yea
Melotik, Paul Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Nedweski, Amanda Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
O'Connor, Jerry Republican Yea
Penterman, William Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Nay
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Not Voting
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tucker, Duke Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 377 do?
An Act to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.); to create 1.101 of the statutes;
Who sponsors AB 377?
AB 377 is sponsored by Jacque, Nass, Murphy, David (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Brooks, Robert (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), and O'Connor, Jerry (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 377?
This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track AB 377?
Track AB 377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 377

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 377

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →