AB 377 — Relating to: establishing English as the official state language, use of artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing English language interpreters, and use of English for governmental oral and written communication and for nongovernmental purposes. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Assembly
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.); to create 1.101 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
129 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Assembly Bill 377 clarify important points regarding the use of artificial intelligence for translation in legal settings. One key change specifies that the requirement to use AI translation tools does not apply to hospitals, ensuring that medical contexts are handled with care. Additionally, it stipulates that the bill's provisions regarding translation do not apply to individuals accused of violent crimes, highlighting a consideration for legal due process. These changes matter as they aim to balance the push for an official language with the need for accessibility in sensitive situations.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0555/1LRB-2578/1 MPG:cdcMPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 377 OctoberJuly 30,17, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentatURPHY.Representatives M URPHY , B EHNKE , BROOKS , GUNDRUM , KREIBICH, MAXEY and O'CONNOR , cosponsored by SenatorACQUE and NASS.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendScience, theTechnology, billand asAI. follows:
A N A CT to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.);
to create 1.101 of the statutes;
relating to:
establishing English as the official state language, use of artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing English language interpreters, and use of English for governmental oral and written communication and for nongovernmental purposes.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Currently, Wisconsin has no official language.
This bill provides that the official language of this state is English.
The bill also allows any state or local governmental entity to provide a person with access to artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing an English language interpreter if the entity is authorized or required by law to appoint an interpreter for the person.
Additionally, the bill provides that, unless otherwise specifically required by law, all oral and written communication by all state and local governmental entities must be in the English language, except that such communication may be in another language when appropriate to the circumstances of an individual case, the - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 implementation of a program in a specific instance, or the discharge of a responsibility in a particular situationThe bill also permits state and local government officers and employees to use a language other than English in oral or written communication whenever necessary for one or more of eight specified purposes.
Finally, the bill precludes any state or local governmental entity from prohibiting any person from becoming proficient in any language or restricting the oral or written use of any language for a nongovernmental purpose.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
1.101 of the statutes is created to read:
1.101 Official state language;
use of English in government operations.
(1) DEFINITIONS.
In this section:
(a) “Local governmental unit” means a political subdivision, a special purpose district, an agency or corporation of a political subdivision or special purpose district, a school district, or a combination or subunit of any of the foregoing, in this state.
(b) “Political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
(c) “State agency” means an association, authority, board, department, commission, independent agency, institution, office, society, or other body in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law.
(2) E STABLISHING ENGLISH AS THE OFFICIAL STATE LANGUAGE .
The official language of this state is English.
(3) A LTERNATIVES TO APPOINTMENT OF INTERPRETERS .
If a state agency or local governmental unit is authorized or required by law to appoint an English - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 language interpreter for a person, the state agency or local governmental unit may, in lieu of appointing an interpreter, provide the person with access to artificial intelligence or other machine-assisted translation tools.
(4) USE OF ENGLISH IN GOVERNMENTAL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION .
(a) Unless otherwise specifically authorized or required by law and except as authorized in par.
(b), all oral and written communication by all state agencies and local governmental units shall be in the English language, except that such communication may be in another language when appropriate to the circumstances of an individual case, the implementation of a program in a specific instance, or the discharge of a responsibility in a particular situation.
(b) An officer or employee of a state agency or local governmental unit may use a language other than English in oral or written communication whenever necessary for any of the following purposes:
PageTo 3,protect linethe 6:health, safety, or liberty of any citizen.
delete Xauthorized in par.
(b)Y and substitute Xprovided in pars.
(b) and (c)Y.
PageTo 4,teach lineor 2:study another language.
after that line insert:
X(c) Paragraph (a) does not apply to a hospital, as defined in s.
50.065 (1) (cm).Y.
PageTo 5,protect linethe 15:rights of a criminal defendant or victim of a crime.
after4. X(3)Y insert Xif the person is not a defendant accused of a violent crime, as defined in s.
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
969.001To (3)Y.promote trade, tourism, or commerce.
END5. )
To facilitate activities relating to the compilation of any census.
6.
To comply with the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act under 20 USC 1400 et seq.
7.
To use a proper name, term of art, or phrase from a language other than English.
- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 1 8.
To comply with the constitution and laws of the United States or the constitution of this state.
(5) U SE OF LANGUAGES .
No state agency or local governmental unit may prohibit any person from becoming proficient in any language or restrict the oral or written use of any language for a nongovernmental purpose.
S ECTION 2.
885.37 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.37 (1) If a municipal court has notice that a person who is a juvenile or parent subject to ch.
938, or who is a witness in a proceeding under ch.
938, has a language difficulty because of the inability to speak or understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak, or has a speech defect, the court shall make a factual determination of whether the language difficulty or the hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the individual person from communicating with his or her the person’s attorney, reasonably understanding the English testimony, or reasonably being understood in EnglishIf the court determines that an interpreter is necessary, the court shall advise the person that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the person has a right to a qualified interpreter and that, if the person cannot afford one, an interpreter will be provided for him or her the person at the public’s expense.
Any waiver of the right to an interpreter is effective only if made voluntarily in person, in open court, and on the record.
S ECTION 3.
885.37 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.37 (3) (b) In any administrative contested case proceeding before a state, county, or municipal agency, if the agency conducting the proceeding has notice that a party to the proceeding has a language difficulty because of the inability to speak - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-2578/1 MPG&KRP:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 377 SECTION 3 or understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak, or has a speech defect, the agency shall make a factual determination of whether the language difficulty or hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the party from communicating with others, reasonably understanding the English testimony, or reasonably being understood in English.
If the agency determines that an interpreter is necessary, the agency shall advise the party that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the party has a right to a qualified interpreter.
After considering the party’s ability to pay and the other needs of the party, the agency may provide for an interpreter for the party at the public’s expense.
Any waiver of the right to an interpreter is effective only if made at the administrative contested case proceeding.
S ECTION 4.
885.38 (3) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.38 (3) (a) (intro.) If the a court determines that the a person has limited English proficiency and that an interpreter is necessary, the court shall advise the person that he or she, except as provided in s.
1.101 (3), the person has the right to a qualified interpreter at the public’s expense if the person is one any of the following:
(END)
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 45, Paired 2
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Representative Steffen added as a coauthor
-
Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 4, Noes 2
-
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Murphy
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI
-
Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Behnke, Brooks, Gundrum, Kreibich, Maxey and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Nass
Sponsors
- Jacque · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Cosponsor
- Robert Brooks · Cosponsor
- Rick Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Dave Maxey · Cosponsor
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 123 not signed on · 43 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Murphy, David Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Jacque
- Nass
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Brooks, Robert Republican
- Gundrum, Rick Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
Not signed on (123)
123 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 123 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 50 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 45 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 46% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (97)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Not Voting |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 377 do?
- An Act to amend 885.37 (1), 885.37 (3) (b) and 885.38 (3) (a) (intro.); to create 1.101 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 377?
- AB 377 is sponsored by Jacque, Nass, Murphy, David (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Brooks, Robert (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), and O'Connor, Jerry (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 377?
- This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced July 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track AB 377?
- Track AB 377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 377
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 377
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →