California 20252026 Regular Session Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

AB 2377 — Personal Income Tax Law and Corporation Tax Law: deductions: accelerated depreciation for new manufacturing operations.

Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in conformity or modified conformity with federal income tax laws, allows various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by those laws, including a deduction for depreciation of certain property put into the service of a trade or business. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, would provide for an accelerated depreciation deduction of 50% or 100%, as applicable, of the adjusted basis, as specified, of qualified property, as defined, put into service by a qualified taxpayer, as defined, during the taxable year. The bill would require a qualified taxpayer to place qualified property with an adjusted basis of at least $1,000,000 into service in the state during the taxable year in order to be eligible for the accelerated depreciation deduction. The bill would require the qualified taxpayer to certify under penalty of perjury that qualified property put into service during the taxable year will be primarily used in the state for at least 3 years. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would also include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.

  7. Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  8. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  9. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

taxation labor technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2377 do?
The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in conformity or modified conformity with federal income tax laws, allows various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by those laws, including a deduction for depreciation of certain property put into the service of a trade or business. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, would provide for an accelerated depreciation deduction of 50% or 100%, as applicable, of the adjusted basis, as specified, of qualified property, as defined, put into service by a qualified taxpayer, as defined, during the taxable year. The bill would require a qualified taxpayer to place qualified property with an adjusted basis of at least $1,000,000 into service in the state during the taxable year in order to be eligible for the accelerated depreciation deduction. The bill would require the qualified taxpayer to certify under penalty of perjury that qualified property put into service during the taxable year will be primarily used in the state for at least 3 years. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would also include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Who sponsors AB 2377?
AB 2377 is sponsored by Soria, Esmeralda (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2377?
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track AB 2377?
Track AB 2377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2377

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2377

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →