California 20252026 Regular Session Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

SB 1003 — Prohousing enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Stalled 28% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill allows prohousing jurisdictions to create enhanced infrastructure financing districts for specific projects.

This legislation enables cities and counties designated as prohousing to establish enhanced infrastructure financing districts for community projects. This includes housing development for low and moderate-income households, with an emphasis on rewarding prohousing local policies.

What this means for you
  • Families: Families may benefit from increased opportunities for affordable housing in communities designated as prohousing.

Summary

The Planning and Zoning law requires each planning agency to prepare and the legislative body of each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city that includes specified elements, including a housing element. The law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to designate jurisdictions as prohousing, as specified. The law requires that jurisdictions that have adopted a housing element that has been found by the department to be in substantial compliance with specified requirements and that have been designated as prohousing based on their adoption of prohousing local policies, as defined, be awarded additional points or preference in the scoring of program applications for certain programs. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to designate a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community, including, among other things, the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of very low, low, and moderate income for rent or purchase, as specified. Existing law authorizes an infrastructure financing plan to contain a provision for the division of taxes levied upon taxable property in the area included within the district, and authorizes the public financing authority of the district to issue bonds, as provided. This bill would authorize a city or county that is designated as prohousing to establish a prohousing enhanced infrastructure financing district if certain requirements are met, as specified. The bill would prescribe requirements applicable to those districts. The bill would expand the definition of "prohousing local policies" for purposes of the above-described provisions to include the establishment of one of these districts, and would require that the jurisdiction that established, and projects located within, a district receive enhanced points or preference than the baseline provided to other prohousing jurisdictions.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends 1 section(s) of the California codes: Section 65589.9 of the Government Code.

  • Section 65589.9 of the Government Code

    SEC. 3.Chapter 20 (commencing with Section 50899.15) is added to Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:20.Infrastructure Partnership Financing Program50899.15.For the purposes of this chapter:(a)“Applicant” means a prohousing enhanced infrastructure financing district established pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 53398.89) of Chapter 2.99 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code.(b)“Program” means the Infrastructure Partnership Financing Program established in Section 50899.16.(c)“Qualified housing development project” means a housing development project, as defined in Section 65589.5 of the Government Code, that meets the following requirements:(1)The parcel or parcels on which the project is located is an infill site, as defined in Section 21061.3 of the Public Resources Code.(2)A portion of the housing development project is subject to a recorded affordability restriction pursuant to Section 53398.93 of the Government Code.50899.16.(a)There is hereby established the Infrastructure Partnership Financing Program for the purpose of financing infrastructure projects needed to assist the development of qualified housing development projects.(b)The department shall administer the program.50899.17.(a)Upon appropriation by the Legislature for purposes of the program, the department shall provide loans or grants to applicants for qualifying housing development projects.(b)The department shall prioritize applications based on all of the following factors:(1)An application that proposes more housing units to be produced shall be given higher priority.(2)An application that has more housing units subject to a recorded affordability restriction shall be given higher priority.(3)An application that shows relative benefits to the public are higher in the analysis provided pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 50899.18 shall be given higher priority.50899.18.To be eligible for the funding described in 50899.17, an applicant shall submit an application to the department with all of the following:(a)The name of the development proponent that is seeking funding.(b)A description of the qualified housing development project, including, but not limited to, the total number of housing units and the total number of housing units subject to a recorded affordability restriction.(c)The amount and type of funding requested.(d)A description of the local resources that will be used to finance infrastructure associated with the qualified housing development project.(e)A list of any infrastructure project needed to assist the development of the qualified housing development project and an estimated cost and completion date for each infrastructure project.(f)An analysis showing that the benefits to the public in terms of the number of units subject to a recorded affordability restriction or more affordable rents is likely to exceed the benefit to the development proponent in terms of reduced production costs.50899.19.(a)The department, in collaboration with stakeholders, shall adopt emergency regulations to implement this chapter.(b)Notwithstanding Section 11346.1 of the Government Code, emergency regulations adopted pursuant to this section shall remain in effect until the date that nonemergency regulations to implement this chapter become effective.

    amended

Action History

  1. Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.

  2. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  3. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 5).

  4. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  6. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.

  7. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 4358.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4260.) (May 14).

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  12. Set for hearing May 14.

  13. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  14. Set for hearing May 11.

  15. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3975.) (April 21).

  17. Set for hearing April 21 in HOUSING pending receipt.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HOUSING. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3903.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  19. Set for hearing April 15.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and HOUSING.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  23. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  24. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Committee vote — Committee CX25 — Committee vote

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Republican 4000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Fong — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 4000
Democratic 11000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 2001
Total 11001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Ávila Farías — Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Housing and Community Development]

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Democratic 8000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 32 Yea · 7 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 30000
Republican 2701
Total 32701
% of votes cast 80%18%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Republican 0200
Total 8200
% of votes cast 80%20%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1003 do?
The Planning and Zoning law requires each planning agency to prepare and the legislative body of each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city that includes specified elements, including a housing element. The law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to designate jurisdictions as prohousing, as specified. The law requires that jurisdictions that have adopted a housing element that has been found by the department to be in substantial compliance with specified requirements and that have been designated as prohousing based on their adoption of prohousing local policies, as defined, be awarded additional points or preference in the scoring of program applications for certain programs. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to designate a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community, including, among other things, the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of very low, low, and moderate income for rent or purchase, as specified. Existing law authorizes an infrastructure financing plan to contain a provision for the division of taxes levied upon taxable property in the area included within the district, and authorizes the public financing authority of the district to issue bonds, as provided. This bill would authorize a city or county that is designated as prohousing to establish a prohousing enhanced infrastructure financing district if certain requirements are met, as specified. The bill would prescribe requirements applicable to those districts. The bill would expand the definition of "prohousing local policies" for purposes of the above-described provisions to include the establishment of one of these districts, and would require that the jurisdiction that established, and projects located within, a district receive enhanced points or preference than the baseline provided to other prohousing jurisdictions.
Who sponsors SB 1003?
SB 1003 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 1003?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 1003?
Track SB 1003 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1003

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1003

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →