California 20252026 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

SB 1090 — Planning and zoning: housing development projects: urban lot splits: subdivisions: 2025 Eaton Wildfire: Altadena.

Last action — Approved by the Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 13, 2026. It awaits signature.

Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence

  • To Executive

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill addresses housing development and urban lot splits in Altadena post-Eaton Wildfire.

This legislation focuses on planning and zoning for housing projects in Altadena, particularly in the wake of the 2025 Eaton Wildfire. It aims to streamline processes for urban lot splits and subdivisions in the affected areas.

What this means for you
  • Families: This means increased opportunities for housing development in your area following the wildfire.

Summary

Planning and zoning: housing development projects: urban lot splits: subdivisions: 2025 Eaton Wildfire: Altadena.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

2 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends 2 section(s) of the California codes: Section 65852.28 of the Government Code; Section 66499.41 of the Government Code.

  • Section 65852.28 of the Government Code

    A A (A)(i)Physically precludes the development of a project built to densities as specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2. This subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2. (ii) (i), (F) (G)(i)For a housing development project consisting of three to seven units, inclusive, impose a floor area ratio standard that is less than 1.0.(ii)For a housing development project consisting of 8 to 10 units, inclusive, impose a floor area ratio standard that is less than 1.25. (f) (g) subdivision A (A)(i)Physically precludes the development of a project built to densities as specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2. This subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2. (ii) (i), (F) (G)(i)For a housing development project consisting of three to seven units, inclusive, impose a floor area ratio standard that is less than 1.0.(ii)For a housing development project consisting of 8 to 10 units, inclusive, impose a floor area ratio standard that is less than 1.25. (f) (g) subdivision → SEC. 2.1. Section 65852.28 of the Government Code is amended to read: Except as provided in subdivision (h), a (3) (A) An application for a housing development project submitted pursuant to this section shall be eligible for concurrent processing with an application for a parcel map or a tentative and final map for a housing development project submitted pursuant to Section 66499.41.(B) (i) A local agency may condition the issuance of a building permit, grading permit, or certificate of occupancy upon the applicant first obtaining approval and recording a parcel map or a tentative and final map for a housing development project pursuant to Section 66499.41.(ii) A local agency may deem a building permit or other postentitlement permit application incomplete and require revisions to the building permit or other postentitlement permit in response to any comments from the local agency or other reviewing agencies regarding the parcel map’s or tentative and final map’s compliance with applicable state or local development and building standards. (h) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), this section shall not apply to a housing development project that is located in ZIP Code 91001 or 91003 if the application is submitted on or after October 1, 2026.(2) This subdivision shall not apply to either of the following:(A) A proposed housing development for which a development application or preliminary application was submitted before October 1, 2026, if all of the following conditions are met:(i) The applicant submits an application for a development project that includes all of the information required to process the development application consistent with Sections 65940, 65941, and 65941.5 within 180 days after October 1, 2026.(ii) If the public agency determines that the application for the development project submitted pursuant to clause (i) is not complete, the development proponent shall submit the specific information needed to complete the application within 90 days of receiving the agency’s written identification of the necessary information. If the development proponent does not submit this information within the 90-day period, then the application shall expire and have no further force or effect.(iii) A public agency shall not take any action that would preclude or impair a development proponent that submitted an application before October 1, 2026, from submitting an application pursuant to this subparagraph. For the purposes of this subdivision, an application will be deemed to have been submitted if the applicant submitted the application in writing.(B) A proposed housing development that meets all of the following criteria:(i) One hundred percent of the units have an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or an affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code.(ii) The units shall be subject to a recorded deed restriction for a period of at least 55 years for rental units and at least 45 years for owner-occupied units.(iii) The development proponent is an entity that is at least one of the following:(I) A community land trust, as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.(II) A qualified nonprofit corporation, as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.(III) A nonprofit housing sponsor or nonprofit corporation, as described in Section 50091 of the Health and Safety Code, whose primary purpose is the development, ownership, or operation of affordable rental housing.(i) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2030, and as of that date is repealed. SEC. 2.2. Section 65852.28 of the Government Code is amended to read: Except as provided in subdivision (i), a (A) (i) Physically precludes the development of a project that includes at least as many units as the maximum number of parcels that may be subdivided on the lot pursuant to parag

    amended

  • Section 66499.41 of the Government Code

    10, A a tenancy as A and uninhabitable. is substantially surrounded by qualified urban uses. is substantially surrounded by qualified urban uses. (iii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the following definitions apply:(I)“Qualified urban use” has the same meaning as defined in Section 21072 of the Public Resources Code.(II)“Substantially surrounded” has the same meaning as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21159.25 of the Public Resources Code. (B) and (C), (C) a tenancy will, pursuant to the requirements of this division, meet (A) parcel is identified project at least as many units as projected for that parcel in the housing element. If the parcel is identified to accommodate any portion of the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need for households, the housing development project will result in at least as many low-income or very low income element. (B)(i)If the parcel is not identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for the current planning period that is in substantial compliance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1, the housing development project will result in at least 66 percent of the maximum allowable residential density as specified by local zoning or 66 percent of the applicable residential density specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2, whichever is greater.(ii)Where local zoning does not specify a maximum allowable residential density, the housing development project will result in at least 66 percent of the applicable residential density as specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2.(iii)The area of any designated remainder parcel described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be excluded from the calculation of residential density under this paragraph. stair, (f) (g) (h)(1 ) (i) A and uninhabitable. is no larger than five acres and is substantially surrounded by qualified urban uses. is substantially surrounded by qualified urban uses. (iii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the following definitions apply:(I)“Qualified urban use” has the same meaning as defined in Section 21072 of the Public Resources Code.(II)“Substantially surrounded” has the same meaning as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21159.25 of the Public Resources Code. (B) and (C), (C) a tenancy will, pursuant to the requirements of this division, meet (A) parcel is identified project at least as many units as projected for that parcel in the housing element. If the parcel is identified to accommodate any portion of the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need households, the housing development project will result in at least as many low-income or very low income element. (B)(i)If the parcel is not identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for the current planning period that is in substantial compliance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1, the housing development project will result in at least 66 percent of the maximum allowable residential density as specified by local zoning or 66 percent of the applicable residential density specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2, whichever is greater.(ii)Where local zoning does not specify a maximum allowable residential density, the housing development project will result in at least 66 percent of the applicable residential density as specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2.(iii)The area of any designated remainder parcel described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be excluded from the calculation of residential density under this paragraph. stair, (f) (g) (h)(1 ) (i) → 1, SEC. 4.1. Section 66499.41 of the Government Code is amended to read: Except as specified in subdivision (j), a in an interest (1) (2) An application for a parcel map or a tentative and final map for a housing development project submitted pursuant to this section shall be eligible for concurrent processing with an application for a housing development project or building permit submitted pursuant to Section 65852.28 or 65913.4.5. (j) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), and except as specified in paragraph (2), this section shall not apply to a parcel map or a tentative and final map for a housing development project that is located in ZIP Code 91001 or 91003 if the application is submitted on or after October 1, 2026.(2) This subdivision shall not apply to either of the following:(A) A parcel map or tentative and final map for a housing development project for which a development application or preliminary application was submitted before October 1, 2026, if all of the following conditions are met:(i) The applicant submits an application for a development project that includes all of the information required to process the development application consistent with Sections 65940, 65941, and 65941.5 within 180 days after October 1, 2026.(ii) If the public agency determines that the application for the development project submitted pursuant to clause (i) is not complete, the development proponent shall submit the specific information needed to complete the application within 90 days of receiving the agency’s written identification of the necessary information. If the development proponent does not submit this information within the 90-day period, then the application shall expire and have no further force or effect.(iii) A public agency shall not take any action that would preclude or impair a development proponent that submitted an application before October 1, 2026, from submitting an application pursuant to this subparagraph. For the purposes of this subdivision, an application will be deemed to have been submitted if the applicant submitted the application in writing.(B) A parcel map or tentative and final map for a housing development project that meets all of the following criteria:(i) One hundred percent of the units have an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or an affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code.(ii) The units shall be subject to a recorded deed restriction for a period of at least 55 years for rental units and at least 45 years for owner-occupied units.(iii) The development proponent is an entity that is at least one of the following:(I) A community land trust, as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.(II) A qualified nonprofit corporation, as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.(III) A nonprofit housing sponsor or nonprofit corporation, as described in Section 50091 of the Health and Safety Code, whose primary purpose is the development, ownership, or operation of affordable rental housing.(k) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2030, and as of that date is repealed. SEC. 4.2. Section 66499.41 of the Government Code is amended to read: Except as specified in subdivision (k), a or does not meet the characteristics in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, of, and paragraph (8) of, subdivision (a) of Section 1941.1 of the Civil Code. that meets the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 21080.66 of the Public Resources Code. that meets the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 21080.66 of the Public Resources Code. in (B), (C), and (D), (C) (i) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), a newly created parcel on a plot zoned for multifamily housing may be as small as 480 square feet, provided that the average size of the newly created parcels is 600 sq

    amended

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  3. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  4. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  5. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6774.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Read third time and amended.

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 1).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  15. Assembly Rule 56 suspended.

  16. June 24 hearing postponed by committee.

  17. Re-referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  19. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  20. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  21. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 4480.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  22. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 2. Page 4085.) (April 28).

  24. Set for hearing April 28.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  27. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  28. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.

  29. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Harabedian

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB1090 Pérez et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 28002
Republican 9001
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Not Voting
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 1090 Pérez Third Reading Urgency By Harabedian

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 18000
Democratic 51003
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 76003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Patterson — Yea
Ávila Farías — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Carrillo — Yea
Fong — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Ahrens, Patrick Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Elhawary, Sade Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Harabedian, John Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Not Voting
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Patel, Darshana R. Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Celeste Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Michelle Democratic Yea
Rogers, Chris Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Schultz, Nick Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Not Voting
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Castillo, Leticia Republican Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
DeMaio, Carl Republican Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Yea
Ellis, Stan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gonzalez, Jeff Republican Yea
Hadwick, Heather Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Johnson, Natasha Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Macedo, Alexandra Republican Yea
Sanchez, Kate Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Yea
Wallis, Greg Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Committee vote — Committee CX10 — Committee vote

Passed 11 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Republican 3000
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 11100
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Ávila Farías — Nay
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Schultz, Nick Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Committee vote — Committee CX15 — Committee vote

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Republican 2000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Johnson, Natasha Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 30 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 30000
Republican 0901
Total 30901
% of votes cast 75%23%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 11000
Republican 0200
Total 11200
% of votes cast 85%15%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1090 do?
Planning and zoning: housing development projects: urban lot splits: subdivisions: 2025 Eaton Wildfire: Altadena.
Who sponsors SB 1090?
SB 1090 is sponsored by Harabedian and Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 1090?
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 13, 2026. It awaits signature.
Where can I track SB 1090?
Track SB 1090 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1090

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1090

Last checked for changes 1 day ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →