Public Lands Protection Act.
This legislation ensures that when federal lands designated for conservation are transferred to private entities, they remain protected under zoning laws. It establishes restrictions on development unless strict environmental reviews are conducted.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1624 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1624.
You're tracking AB 1624
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1624 — Public Lands Protection Act.
Last action — Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced January 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (9 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill protects certain public lands from development after transfer to private entities.
This legislation ensures that when federal lands designated for conservation are transferred to private entities, they remain protected under zoning laws. It establishes restrictions on development unless strict environmental reviews are conducted.
What this means for you
- Environment: This bill means enhanced protections for public lands, ensuring they are preserved for conservation and environmental purposes.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and of any land outside its boundaries that bears relation to its planning. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, open space, and other purposes, as provided. For these purposes, existing law authorizes the legislative body to divide a county or city into zones, but requires that regulations adopted be uniform for each class or kind of building or use of land throughout each zone. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill, the Public Lands Protection Act, would, upon transfer to any private or nonfederal entity of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance as open space, public land, resource conservation, or an equivalent conservation-oriented designation, immediately subject that parcel to the zoning designation and associated state and local restrictions. The bill would also, upon transfer of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has not been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance at the time of transfer to any private or nonfederal entity, automatically subject that parcel to the most restrictive conservation-oriented zoning designation currently applied in the jurisdiction, by operation of law. The bill would prohibit a parcel of land governed by these provisions from being rezoned, subdivided, or granted any development entitlement that is inconsistent with a conservation-oriented zoning designation, unless certain requirements are satisfied, including that a full environmental impact report is completed in accordance with CEQA. Notwithstanding these provisions, the bill would require electric infrastructure and clean energy facilities necessary to achieve California's climate and decarbonization goals to be deemed permitted uses in a conservation-oriented zoning designation if certain conditions are met. The bill would also exempt certain other parcels from these provisions. This bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill would make these provisions severable. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The new version of Bill AB 1624 has made a small update by adding some text to clarify its provisions. This change is important because it helps ensure that everyone understands the intent and impact of the law. By providing clearer language, it aims to prevent confusion and improve compliance among those affected by the bill. Overall, these adjustments help enhance the bill's effectiveness.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 01/22/26 - Introduced Current pdf January 22, 2026
- AB1624 View text html
Action History
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Gail Pellerin · Cosponsor
- Gregg Hart · Cosponsor
- Damon Connolly · Cosponsor
- Chris Rogers · Cosponsor
- James C. Ramos · Cosponsor
- Jeff Gonzalez · Cosponsor
- Dawn Addis · Cosponsor
- Rick Chavez Zbur · Primary
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic
Co-sponsors (9)
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Pellerin, Gail Democratic
- Hart, Gregg Democratic
- Connolly, Damon Democratic
- Rogers, Chris Democratic
- Ramos, James C. Democratic
- Gonzalez, Jeff Republican
- Addis, Dawn Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1624 do?
- The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and of any land outside its boundaries that bears relation to its planning. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, open space, and other purposes, as provided. For these purposes, existing law authorizes the legislative body to divide a county or city into zones, but requires that regulations adopted be uniform for each class or kind of building or use of land throughout each zone. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill, the Public Lands Protection Act, would, upon transfer to any private or nonfederal entity of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance as open space, public land, resource conservation, or an equivalent conservation-oriented designation, immediately subject that parcel to the zoning designation and associated state and local restrictions. The bill would also, upon transfer of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has not been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance at the time of transfer to any private or nonfederal entity, automatically subject that parcel to the most restrictive conservation-oriented zoning designation currently applied in the jurisdiction, by operation of law. The bill would prohibit a parcel of land governed by these provisions from being rezoned, subdivided, or granted any development entitlement that is inconsistent with a conservation-oriented zoning designation, unless certain requirements are satisfied, including that a full environmental impact report is completed in accordance with CEQA. Notwithstanding these provisions, the bill would require electric infrastructure and clean energy facilities necessary to achieve California's climate and decarbonization goals to be deemed permitted uses in a conservation-oriented zoning designation if certain conditions are met. The bill would also exempt certain other parcels from these provisions. This bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill would make these provisions severable. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1624?
- AB 1624 is sponsored by Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Pellerin, Gail (Democratic), Hart, Gregg (Democratic), Connolly, Damon (Democratic), Rogers, Chris (Democratic), Ramos, James C. (Democratic), Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Addis, Dawn (Democratic), Zbur, Rick Chavez (Democratic), and Garcia, Robert (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1624?
- This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced January 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track AB 1624?
- Track AB 1624 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1624
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1624
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →