California 20252026 Regular Session Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

SB 1007 — Common interest developments: annual reports: assessments: discipline.

Last action — June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Stalled 28% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill modifies requirements for assessments and discipline in common interest developments.

This bill requires annual budget reports in common interest developments to compare projected and actual expenses and limits assessment increases. It also mandates that evidence be shared with members prior to hearings about potential disciplinary actions.

What this means for you
  • Families: This means families living in common interest developments will have clearer insights into finances and greater protection during disciplinary hearings.

Summary

Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the formation and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires that a common interest development be managed by an association. Existing law requires an association of a common interest development to levy regular and special assessments to perform its obligations under the governing documents and the act, as provided. Existing law requires an association to prepare an annual budget report and a policy statement, as specified. Existing law requires the association to either deliver to all members the full report or a summary of the report that includes specified information, on the first page, whenever the annual budget report or a policy statement is prepared, as provided. This bill would require the annual budget report to include a comparison breakdown of the anticipated expenses of the previous fiscal year versus actual expenditures of the previous fiscal year and a statement regarding compensation of a management company, as provided. The bill would require a summary of an annual budget to also include the comparison breakdown and the statement regarding compensation of a management company, as specified. Existing law prohibits increases in regular assessments for any fiscal year, unless the board complies with certain requirements, including certain information in its annual budget report. Existing law prohibits an association from increasing regular assessments by more than 20 percent, without the approval of a majority of a quorum of members. This bill would prohibit an association from increasing a regular assessment, unless the board includes the above-referenced information pertaining to regular assessments. The bill would, instead, prohibit a board from increasing regular assessments by more than 8%, without the approval of the majority of a quorum of members. Existing law requires the association to notify a member 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline on a member, or a monetary charge, as a means of reimbursing the association for costs incurred by the association in the repair of damage to the common area and facilities caused by a member, as provided. Existing law requires the notification to include, among other information, the nature of the alleged violation, or nature of the damage to the common area and facilities. This bill would require the association to make any physical evidence used to determine a violation of the governing documents has occurred available to the member at least 5 business days before the hearing or deadline for the member's response, if the association seeks to impose a monetary penalty against a member for violation of the governing documents, as provided.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends 1 section(s) of the California codes: Section 5300 of the Civil Code.

  • Section 5300 of the Civil Code

    expenditures current current → expenses previous previous

    amended

Action History

  1. June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  3. Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D., JUD., and APPR.

  4. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 4482.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Ordered to second reading.

  8. Read third time and amended.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 4085.) (April 28).

  11. Set for hearing April 28.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3589.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. Set for hearing March 17.

  14. Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and JUD.

  15. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  16. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading SB1007 Menjivar et al.

Passed 24 Yea · 13 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 23601
Republican 1702
Total 241303
% of votes cast 60%33%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Nay
Becker, Josh Democratic Nay
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Nay
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Nay
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Nay
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 9002
Republican 0101
Total 9103
% of votes cast 69%8%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Not Voting
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Republican 0200
Total 8200
% of votes cast 80%20%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1007 do?
Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the formation and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires that a common interest development be managed by an association. Existing law requires an association of a common interest development to levy regular and special assessments to perform its obligations under the governing documents and the act, as provided. Existing law requires an association to prepare an annual budget report and a policy statement, as specified. Existing law requires the association to either deliver to all members the full report or a summary of the report that includes specified information, on the first page, whenever the annual budget report or a policy statement is prepared, as provided. This bill would require the annual budget report to include a comparison breakdown of the anticipated expenses of the previous fiscal year versus actual expenditures of the previous fiscal year and a statement regarding compensation of a management company, as provided. The bill would require a summary of an annual budget to also include the comparison breakdown and the statement regarding compensation of a management company, as specified. Existing law prohibits increases in regular assessments for any fiscal year, unless the board complies with certain requirements, including certain information in its annual budget report. Existing law prohibits an association from increasing regular assessments by more than 20 percent, without the approval of a majority of a quorum of members. This bill would prohibit an association from increasing a regular assessment, unless the board includes the above-referenced information pertaining to regular assessments. The bill would, instead, prohibit a board from increasing regular assessments by more than 8%, without the approval of the majority of a quorum of members. Existing law requires the association to notify a member 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline on a member, or a monetary charge, as a means of reimbursing the association for costs incurred by the association in the repair of damage to the common area and facilities caused by a member, as provided. Existing law requires the notification to include, among other information, the nature of the alleged violation, or nature of the damage to the common area and facilities. This bill would require the association to make any physical evidence used to determine a violation of the governing documents has occurred available to the member at least 5 business days before the hearing or deadline for the member's response, if the association seeks to impose a monetary penalty against a member for violation of the governing documents, as provided.
Who sponsors SB 1007?
SB 1007 is sponsored by Menjivar, Caroline (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 1007?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 1007?
Track SB 1007 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1007

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1007

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →