Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: In Committee 16 D cosponsors

HB 2752 — An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in human trafficking, further providing for asset forfeiture.

Last action — Referred to Judiciary

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced August 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (16 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill updates laws on asset forfeiture related to human trafficking in Pennsylvania.

This bill amends existing human trafficking laws to clarify rules about asset forfeiture. It aims to ensure more effective management of assets tied to human trafficking offenses.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill modifies asset forfeiture laws related to human trafficking in Pennsylvania by enforcing mandatory forfeiture upon conviction and prioritizing restitution payments.

  • Section 3021

    Mandatory forfeiture.--In addition to property subject to forfeiture under subsection (a), if a person is convicted of a violation of this chapter, the court, in imposing sentence, shall order the person to forfeit to the Commonwealth the person's interest in any of the following: Real or personal property that was involved in, used or intended to be used to commit or facilitate the commission of the violation and property traceable to the property. Real or personal property that constitutes or is derived from proceeds that the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the violation and property traceable to the property.

    This adds a mandatory forfeiture requirement for properties involved in or derived from violations of human trafficking laws.

  • Section 3021(d)

    The balance of the proceeds shall be distributed under [subsection (m)] subsections (m) and (m.1). → The balance of the proceeds shall be distributed under subsections (m) and (m.1).

    This change clarifies the process for distributing forfeiture proceeds by removing a redundant part of the text.

  • Section 3021(m)

    Restitution priority.-- (1) The Attorney General or district attorney, where appropriate, shall transfer money, property or proceeds forfeited under this section to satisfy an order of restitution arising from a violation of this chapter. (2) A transfer under paragraph (1) shall have priority over a distribution under subsection (m) to a law enforcement agency, the office of the prosecuting attorney or the commission. (3) A transfer under this subsection shall not reduce or otherwise mitigate the obligation of a person convicted of a violation of this chapter to satisfy the full amount of an order of restitution through nonforfeited assets.

    This introduces a new subsection that prioritizes restitution payments over other distributions of forfeited proceeds.

Action History

  1. Referred to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 237 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (237)

237 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 237 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2752?
HB 2752 is sponsored by John C. Inglis III (Democratic), Heather Boyd (Democratic), Jacklyn Rusnock (Democratic), Darisha K. Parker (Democratic), Robert E. Merski (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), Eddie Day Pashinski (Democratic), Ed Neilson (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Joseph C. Hohenstein (Democratic), Manuel Guzman (Democratic), Maureen E. Madden (Democratic), Tarah Probst (Democratic), Tim Brennan (Democratic), Regina G. Young (Democratic), and Danilo Burgos (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 2752?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced August 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 2752?
Track HB 2752 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2752

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2752

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →