United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee 4 D cosponsors

HR 6092 — Constitutional Accountability Act

Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced November 18, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 22% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill expands liability for constitutional violations by explicitly including the United States, States, local governments, and their employees acting as law enforcement officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    Every → (a) In this section: (1) The term `person' includes-- (A) the United States; (B) a State or Territory or the District of Columbia; (C) a local government; (D) an agency, government body, or any subdivision of the United States, a State or Territory or the District of Columbia, or a local government, or an entity created by a combination of any of the foregoing; and (E) an individual or private entity. (2) The term `law enforcement officer' includes any officer of a local government, or of a State or Territory or the District of Columbia, or of the United States, or an entity created by a combination of any of the foregoing who is empowered by law to execute searches, to seize evidence, or to make arrests for violations of law. (b) Every

    This change defines 'person' to include various government entities and law enforcement officers, thereby expanding the scope of potential defendants under this statute.

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    (2) The United States,

    This addition specifies that the United States can be held liable for constitutional violations, which was not previously clear under existing law.

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    (c) A person is liable under this section for a violation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws committed by an individual who at the time of the violation is employed by the person as, or contracted by the person to do the work of, a law enforcement officer. Liability under this subsection shall exist without regard to whether such employee or contractor would be immune from liability, and without regard to whether the employee or contractor was acting pursuant to a policy or custom of the person who is the employer.

    This new provision establishes that employers can be liable for the constitutional violations committed by their law enforcement officers, regardless of the officers' immunity or policies.

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    (d) Pursuant to section 5 of the 14th Amendment, no State shall be immune from suit, under the Eleventh Amendment or other doctrine of State sovereign immunity, for any claims on which subsection (c) subjects a person to liability.

    This provision eliminates state sovereign immunity for claims arising under the new liability standards established in subsection (c).

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    (e) For purposes of an action under subsection (c), the United States waives its sovereign immunity.

    This addition means that individuals can sue the United States for constitutional violations committed by its law enforcement officers.

  • 42 U.S.C. 1983

    (f) Except as expressly stated, no provision of this section shall be construed to abolish, repeal, or limit the scope of any right of action otherwise available under this section or any other source of law.

    This provision clarifies that the bill does not limit existing rights to sue under current law.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 543 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (543)

543 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 543 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HR 6092?
HR 6092 is sponsored by Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" (Democratic), Thanedar, Shri (Democratic), Wasserman Schultz, Debbie (Democratic), and García, Jesús G. "Chuy" (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 6092?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced November 18, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 6092?
Track HR 6092 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 6092

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 6092

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →