United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 3 R · 1 D cosponsors

HR 3825 — Kelsey Smith Act

Last action — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 06, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

7 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill requires telecommunications carriers to provide location information to law enforcement and public safety officials in emergency situations, amending existing confidentiality provisions.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    Nothing in this section → (1) Permitted disclosures.--Nothing in this section

    This change allows for specific exceptions to the confidentiality provisions, enabling certain disclosures.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    (2) Required emergency disclosure of location information to law enforcement or public safety answering point.-- Notwithstanding subsections (a), (b), and (c), at the request of an investigative or law enforcement officer or an employee or other agent of a public safety answering point acting on behalf of such an officer, who is acting in the course of the official duties of the officer or agent, a provider of a covered service shall provide to the officer or agent the available location information of a telecommunications device without delay if the officer or agent asserts-- (i) that the device was used to place a 9-1-1 call requesting emergency assistance during the preceding 48-hour period; or (ii) reasonable suspicion that the device is in the possession of an individual who is involved in an emergency situation that involves the risk of death or serious physical harm.

    This establishes a new requirement for providers to disclose location information in emergencies.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    (8) Covered service.--The term `covered service' means-- (A) a commercial mobile service (as defined in section 332(d)); or (B) an IP-enabled voice service (as defined in section 7 of the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (47 U.S.C. 615b)).

    This defines what constitutes a 'covered service' for the purposes of the required disclosures.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    (9) Investigative or law enforcement officer.--The term `investigative or law enforcement officer' has the meaning given the term `Investigative or law enforcement officer' in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code.

    This clarifies the definition of 'investigative or law enforcement officer' as it relates to the new provisions.

  • 18 U.S.C. 2707(a)

    of this title and section 222(d)(2)(C) of the Communications Act of 1934

    This amendment references the new requirement for disclosure in civil actions related to violations.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    If an investigative or law enforcement officer, or an employee or other agent of a public safety answering point acting on behalf of such an officer, submits a request for location information to a provider of a covered service under subparagraph (A), the investigative or law enforcement agency employing the officer shall maintain a record of the request that includes each of the following: (i) The name of the officer or agent making the request (and, in the case of a request made by an agent, the name of the officer on whose behalf the agent is acting). (ii) A description of the request that explains the need for disclosure of location information. (iii) A declaration that disclosure of location information is needed based on the conditions described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A).

    This mandates record-keeping for requests made under the new emergency disclosure provision.

  • 47 U.S.C. 222

    No cause of action shall lie in any court, nor shall any civil or administrative proceeding be commenced by any person or entity, against a provider of a covered service, or its directors, officers, employees, agents, or vendors, for providing location information or assistance in accordance with subparagraph (A) and any regulations promulgated under this paragraph.

    This provides immunity to service providers from lawsuits when they comply with the new disclosure requirements.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 543 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (543)

543 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 543 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HR 3825?
HR 3825 is sponsored by Davids, Sharice (Democratic), Estes, Ron (Republican), Mann, Tracey (Republican), and Schmidt, Derek (Republican).
What is the current status of HR 3825?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 06, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 3825?
Track HR 3825 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 3825

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 3825

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →