Ohio 136th General Assembly Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 35 — Regards supported decision-making for certain disabled adults

Last action — Referred to committee

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of the Revised Code to establish supported decision-making as a less restrictive alternative to guardianship for adults with developmental disabilities.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

10 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 35 expanded its list of cosponsors from just two senators to a total of 18. This change indicates broader support for the bill among lawmakers, which could help it gain more traction and increase its chances of becoming law. The increase in cosponsors shows that more legislators are onboard with the bill's goals, making it a significant development in the legislative process.

→
Previous
Latest
As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub.
As Passed by the Senate 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub.
Senators Wilkin, Manning To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 1 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of 2 the Revised Code to establish supported 3 decision-making as a less restrictive 4 alternative to guardianship for adults with 5 developmental disabilities.
Senators Wilkin, Manning, Antonio, Blackshear, Craig, DeMora, Gavarone, Hicks-Hudson, Huffman, Ingram, Johnson, Liston, O'Brien, Patton, Reineke, Roegner, Schaffer, Smith, Timken, Weinstein, Wilson To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 1 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of 2 the Revised Code to establish supported 3 decision-making as a less restrictive 4 alternative to guardianship for adults with 5 developmental disabilities.
14 (B) "Supported decision-making" means the process of 15 supporting and accommodating an adult with a developmental 16 disability who is making, communicating, or implementing the 17 adult's own life decisions without impeding the adult's self- 18 determination.
14 (B) "Supported decision-making" means the process of 15 supporting and accommodating an adult with a developmental 16 disability who is making, communicating, or implementing the 17 Sub.
19 Sub.
35 Page 2 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee "Supported decision-making" may include any matter 20 impacting the adult's life.
35 Page 2 As Passed by the Senate adult's own life decisions without impeding the adult's self- 18 determination.
19 "Supported decision-making" may include any matter 20 impacting the adult's life.
The 45 adult's choice to act independently of the plan or a supporter 46 is not evidence of incapacity and shall not be used as such.
The 45 adult's choice to act independently of the plan or a supporter 46 Sub.
47 (E) Evidence that an adult with a developmental disability 48 Sub.
35 Page 3 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee uses supported decision-making may be presented as a less 49 restrictive alternative to guardianship pursuant to division (C) 50 (5) of section 2111.02 of the Revised Code.
35 Page 3 As Passed by the Senate is not evidence of incapacity and shall not be used as such.
47 (E) Evidence that an adult with a developmental disability 48 uses supported decision-making may be presented as a less 49 restrictive alternative to guardianship pursuant to division (C) 50 (5) of section 2111.02 of the Revised Code.
73 (c) Social service, medical service, and financial service 74 professionals and other professionals likely to encounter 75 supported decision-making plans;
73 Sub.
76 Sub.
35 Page 4 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee (d) The general public.
35 Page 4 As Passed by the Senate (c) Social service, medical service, and financial service 74 professionals and other professionals likely to encounter 75 supported decision-making plans;
76 (d) The general public.
100 (5) Understanding the principal's personal values, 101 beliefs, and preferences, including the principal's cultural, 102 ethnic, or religious heritage, and using this information to 103 Sub.
100 Sub.
35 Page 5 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee advocate for the implementation of the principal's wishes and 104 decisions;
35 Page 5 As Passed by the Senate (5) Understanding the principal's personal values, 101 beliefs, and preferences, including the principal's cultural, 102 ethnic, or religious heritage, and using this information to 103 advocate for the implementation of the principal's wishes and 104 decisions;
128 (E)(1) In the event the supporter has a conflict of 129 interest or potential conflict of interest in a decision made by 130 the principal, the supporter shall do both of the following:
128 (E)(1) In the event the supporter has a conflict of 129 Sub.
131 Sub.
35 Page 6 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee (a) Fully disclose the conflict of interest to the 132 principal and any other members of the principal's support team, 133 including a service and support administrator or a qualified 134 intellectual disability professional;
35 Page 6 As Passed by the Senate interest or potential conflict of interest in a decision made by 130 the principal, the supporter shall do both of the following:
131 (a) Fully disclose the conflict of interest to the 132 principal and any other members of the principal's support team, 133 including a service and support administrator or a qualified 134 intellectual disability professional;
157 (1) The supported decision-making plan has been modified 158 or ended pursuant to section 5123.685 of the Revised Code.
157 (1) The supported decision-making plan has been modified 158 Sub.
159 (2) The principal has not authorized the supporter to 160 Sub.
35 Page 7 As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee engage in the specific action taken.
35 Page 7 As Passed by the Senate or ended pursuant to section 5123.685 of the Revised Code.
159 (2) The principal has not authorized the supporter to 160 engage in the specific action taken.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. As Passed by the Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 31 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 22000
Democratic 9000
Total 31000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (31)
Member Party Vote
Beth Liston Democratic Yea
Casey Weinstein Democratic Yea
Catherine D. Ingram Democratic Yea
Hearcel F. Craig Democratic Yea
Kent Smith Democratic Yea
Nickie J. Antonio Democratic Yea
Paula Hicks-Hudson Democratic Yea
William P. DeMora Democratic Yea
Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. Democratic Yea
Al Cutrona Republican Yea
Al Landis Republican Yea
Andrew O. Brenner Republican Yea
Bill Reineke Republican Yea
Brian M. Chavez Republican Yea
Jane M. Timken Republican Yea
Jerry C. Cirino Republican Yea
Kristina D. Roegner Republican Yea
Kyle Koehler Republican Yea
Louis W. Blessing, III Republican Yea
Michele Reynolds Republican Yea
Nathan H. Manning Republican Yea
Rob McColley Republican Yea
Sandra O'Brien Republican Yea
Shane Wilkin Republican Yea
Stephen A. Huffman Republican Yea
Steve Wilson Republican Yea
Susan Manchester Republican Yea
Terry Johnson Republican Yea
Theresa Gavarone Republican Yea
Thomas F. Patton Republican Yea
Tim Schaffer Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 35 do?
To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of the Revised Code to establish supported decision-making as a less restrictive alternative to guardianship for adults with developmental disabilities.
Who sponsors SB 35?
SB 35 is sponsored by Jerry C. Cirino (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 35?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 35?
Track SB 35 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 35

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 35

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →