SB 35 — Regards supported decision-making for certain disabled adults
Last action — Referred to committee
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of the Revised Code to establish supported decision-making as a less restrictive alternative to guardianship for adults with developmental disabilities.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 35 expanded its list of cosponsors from just two senators to a total of 18. This change indicates broader support for the bill among lawmakers, which could help it gain more traction and increase its chances of becoming law. The increase in cosponsors shows that more legislators are onboard with the bill's goals, making it a significant development in the legislative process.
As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciary Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub.
Senators Wilkin, ManningManning, Antonio, Blackshear, Craig, DeMora, Gavarone, Hicks-Hudson, Huffman, Ingram, Johnson, Liston, O'Brien, Patton, Reineke, Roegner, Schaffer, Smith, Timken, Weinstein, Wilson To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 1 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of 2 the Revised Code to establish supported 3 decision-making as a less restrictive 4 alternative to guardianship for adults with 5 developmental disabilities.
14 (B) "Supported decision-making" means the process of 15 supporting and accommodating an adult with a developmental 16 disability who is making, communicating, or implementing the 17 adult'sSub. own life decisions without impeding the adult's self- 18 determination.
19 Sub.
35 Page 2 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciaryadult's Committeeown "Supportedlife decision-making"decisions maywithout includeimpeding any matter 20 impacting the adult's life.self- 18 determination.
19 "Supported decision-making" may include any matter 20 impacting the adult's life.
The 45 adult's choice to act independently of the plan or a supporter 46 isSub. not evidence of incapacity and shall not be used as such.
47 (E) Evidence that an adult with a developmental disability 48 Sub.
35 Page 3 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciaryis Committeenot usesevidence supportedof decision-makingincapacity mayand shall not be presentedused as asuch. less 49 restrictive alternative to guardianship pursuant to division (C) 50 (5) of section 2111.02 of the Revised Code.
47 (E) Evidence that an adult with a developmental disability 48 uses supported decision-making may be presented as a less 49 restrictive alternative to guardianship pursuant to division (C) 50 (5) of section 2111.02 of the Revised Code.
73 (c)Sub. Social service, medical service, and financial service 74 professionals and other professionals likely to encounter 75 supported decision-making plans;
76 Sub.
35 Page 4 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciary(c) CommitteeSocial (d)service, Themedical generalservice, public.and financial service 74 professionals and other professionals likely to encounter 75 supported decision-making plans;
76 (d) The general public.
100 (5) Understanding the principal's personal values, 101 beliefs, and preferences, including the principal's cultural, 102 ethnic, or religious heritage, and using this information to 103 Sub.
35 Page 5 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciary(5) CommitteeUnderstanding the principal's personal values, 101 beliefs, and preferences, including the principal's cultural, 102 ethnic, or religious heritage, and using this information to 103 advocate for the implementation of the principal's wishes and 104 decisions;
128 (E)(1) In the event the supporter has a conflict of 129 interestSub. or potential conflict of interest in a decision made by 130 the principal, the supporter shall do both of the following:
131 Sub.
35 Page 6 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciaryinterest Committeeor (a)potential Fully disclose the conflict of interest toin thea 132decision principalmade andby any130 otherthe membersprincipal, of the principal'ssupporter supportshall team,do 133both includingof athe servicefollowing: and support administrator or a qualified 134 intellectual disability professional;
131 (a) Fully disclose the conflict of interest to the 132 principal and any other members of the principal's support team, 133 including a service and support administrator or a qualified 134 intellectual disability professional;
157 (1) The supported decision-making plan has been modified 158 orSub. ended pursuant to section 5123.685 of the Revised Code.
159 (2) The principal has not authorized the supporter to 160 Sub.
35 Page 7 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Judiciaryor Committeeended engagepursuant into thesection specific5123.685 actionof taken.the Revised Code.
159 (2) The principal has not authorized the supporter to 160 engage in the specific action taken.
View plain text versions (3)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Reported As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
As Passed by the Senate
Sponsors
- Jerry C. Cirino · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jerry C. Cirino Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Paula Hicks-Hudson | Democratic | Yea |
| Al Cutrona | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Nathan H. Manning | Republican | Yea |
| Theresa Gavarone | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (31)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Yea |
| Casey Weinstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine D. Ingram | Democratic | Yea |
| Hearcel F. Craig | Democratic | Yea |
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Nickie J. Antonio | Democratic | Yea |
| Paula Hicks-Hudson | Democratic | Yea |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Yea |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Al Cutrona | Republican | Yea |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew O. Brenner | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Reineke | Republican | Yea |
| Brian M. Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| Jane M. Timken | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry C. Cirino | Republican | Yea |
| Kristina D. Roegner | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Koehler | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Nathan H. Manning | Republican | Yea |
| Rob McColley | Republican | Yea |
| Sandra O'Brien | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen A. Huffman | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Susan Manchester | Republican | Yea |
| Terry Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Theresa Gavarone | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas F. Patton | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 35 do?
- To enact sections 5123.68, 5123.681, 5123.682, 5123.683, 5123.684, 5123.685, and 5123.686 of the Revised Code to establish supported decision-making as a less restrictive alternative to guardianship for adults with developmental disabilities.
- Who sponsors SB 35?
- SB 35 is sponsored by Jerry C. Cirino (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 35?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 35?
- Track SB 35 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 35
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 35
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →