SB 342 — Prohibit certain clauses from conservancy district contracts
Last action — Introduced
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 20, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill prevents conservancy districts from including specific clauses in contracts for goods or services.
This bill prohibits conservancy districts from including certain provisions, like indemnification clauses, in their contracts. It aims to limit liability issues in the procurement process.
Summary
To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract for the procurement of goods or services.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
3 added · 3 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 342 now lists multiple cosponsors who support the bill, rather than just one. This change highlights broader backing for the legislation and can increase its chances of moving forward. Adding more supporters can also indicate that the bill addresses issues important to a wider group of lawmakers.
As ReportedPassed by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
342 2025-2026 Senators Landis, Chavez Cosponsor:Cosponsors:
SenatorSenators SchafferSchaffer, Antonio, Cirino, Craig, Reineke To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to 1 prohibit a conservancy district's board of 2 directors from including certain provisions, 3 such as an indemnification clause, in a contract 4 for the procurement of goods or services.
342 Page 2 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee caused by the negligence, intentional or willful misconduct, 20 fraudulent act, recklessness, or other tortious conduct of a 21 person or a person's employees or agents, or a provision that 22 otherwise imposes an indemnification obligation on the district;
View plain text versions (3)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Reported As Reported by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
As Passed by the Senate
Sponsors
- Al Landis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Al Landis Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Yea |
| Casey Weinstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine D. Ingram | Democratic | Yea |
| Hearcel F. Craig | Democratic | Yea |
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Nickie J. Antonio | Democratic | Yea |
| Paula Hicks-Hudson | Democratic | Yea |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Yea |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Al Cutrona | Republican | Yea |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew O. Brenner | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Reineke | Republican | Yea |
| Brian M. Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| George F. Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Jane M. Timken | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry C. Cirino | Republican | Yea |
| Kristina D. Roegner | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Koehler | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Romanchuk | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Nathan H. Manning | Republican | Yea |
| Rob McColley | Republican | Yea |
| Sandra O'Brien | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen A. Huffman | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Susan Manchester | Republican | Yea |
| Terry Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Theresa Gavarone | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas F. Patton | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Yea |
| Paula Hicks-Hudson | Democratic | Yea |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Koehler | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 342 do?
- To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract for the procurement of goods or services.
- Who sponsors SB 342?
- SB 342 is sponsored by Al Landis (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 342?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 20, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 342?
- Track SB 342 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 342
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 342
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →