Ohio 136th General Assembly Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 324 — Revise X-ray machine operator and radiation technician law

Last action — Introduced

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced November 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill amends laws regarding X-ray machine operators and radiation technicians.

This bill updates existing laws that regulate the work of general X-ray machine operators and radiation technicians. It clarifies requirements and responsibilities within these professions.

What this means for you
  • Workers: This means that workers in the radiation technology field may face updated training and certification requirements.

Summary

To amend sections 4773.01, 4773.02, 4773.03, and 4773.06 of the Revised Code to revise the law governing general X-ray machine operators and other radiation technicians.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

10 added · 9 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 324 now includes several additional co-sponsors, reflecting broader support from Senators Ingram, Romanchuk, Cirino, Hicks-Hudson, Manning, O'Brien, Reineke, Reynolds, and Roegner. Meanwhile, the mention of the co-sponsors from the Senate Health Committee has been removed. This change signals a shift toward a larger coalition backing the bill, which can enhance its chances of success in the legislative process.

→
Previous
Latest
As Reported by the Senate Health Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
As Passed by the Senate 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
Senators Ingram, Romanchuk To amend sections 4773.01, 4773.02, 4773.03, and 1 4773.06 of the Revised Code to revise the law 2 governing general X-ray machine operators and 3 other radiation technicians.
Senators Ingram, Romanchuk, Cirino, Hicks-Hudson, Manning, O'Brien, Reineke, Reynolds, Roegner To amend sections 4773.01, 4773.02, 4773.03, and 1 4773.06 of the Revised Code to revise the law 2 governing general X-ray machine operators and 3 other radiation technicians.
15 (C) "Ionizing radiation" means any electromagnetic or 16 particulate radiation that interacts with atoms to produce 17 ionization in matter, including x-rays, gamma rays, alpha and 18 beta particles, high speed electrons, neutrons, and other 19 S.
15 (C) "Ionizing radiation" means any electromagnetic or 16 particulate radiation that interacts with atoms to produce 17 ionization in matter, including x-rays, gamma rays, alpha and 18 S.
324 Page 2 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee nuclear particles.
324 Page 2 As Passed by the Senate beta particles, high speed electrons, neutrons, and other 19 nuclear particles.
45 (3) Documents orders for contrast in patient medical 46 S.
45 S.
324 Page 3 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee records;
324 Page 3 As Passed by the Senate (3) Documents orders for contrast in patient medical 46 records;
75, radiologic personnel 72 employed by the federal government or serving in a branch of the 73 S.
75, radiologic personnel 72 S.
324 Page 4 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee armed forces of the United States;
324 Page 4 As Passed by the Senate employed by the federal government or serving in a branch of the 73 armed forces of the United States;
101 (C) An applicant is not required to take a licensing 102 S.
101 S.
324 Page 5 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee examination if one of the following applies to the applicant:
324 Page 5 As Passed by the Senate (C) An applicant is not required to take a licensing 102 examination if one of the following applies to the applicant:
129 (D) A license issued under this section expires biennially 130 on the license holder's birthday, except for an initial license 131 S.
129 (D) A license issued under this section expires biennially 130 S.
324 Page 6 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee which expires on the license holder's birthday following two 132 years after it is issued.
324 Page 6 As Passed by the Senate on the license holder's birthday, except for an initial license 131 which expires on the license holder's birthday following two 132 years after it is issued.
In the case of an applicant seeking reinstatement 157 based on having passed an examination administered under section 158 4773.04 of the Revised Code, the length of time that has elapsed 159 since the examination was passed is not a consideration in 160 determining whether the applicant is eligible for reinstatement.
In the case of an applicant seeking reinstatement 157 based on having passed an examination administered under section 158 4773.04 of the Revised Code, the length of time that has elapsed 159 since the examination was passed is not a consideration in 160 S.
161 S.
324 Page 7 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee (b) The applicant must complete the continuing education 162 requirements for reinstatement established in rules adopted 163 under section 4773.08 of the Revised Code.
324 Page 7 As Passed by the Senate determining whether the applicant is eligible for reinstatement.
161 (b) The applicant must complete the continuing education 162 requirements for reinstatement established in rules adopted 163 under section 4773.08 of the Revised Code.
Direct 187 supervision does not require the practitioner to observe each 188 radiologic procedure performed by the operator, but does require 189 that the practitioner to be present at the location where the 190 S.
Direct 187 supervision does not require the practitioner to observe each 188 radiologic procedure performed by the operator, but does require 189 S.
324 Page 8 As Reported by the Senate Health Committee operator is performing radiologic procedures for purposes of 191 consulting with and directing the operator while performing the 192 procedures.
324 Page 8 As Passed by the Senate that the practitioner to be present at the location where the 190 operator is performing radiologic procedures for purposes of 191 consulting with and directing the operator while performing the 192 procedures.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. As Passed by the Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 24000
Democratic 9000
Total 33000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
Beth Liston Democratic Yea
Casey Weinstein Democratic Yea
Catherine D. Ingram Democratic Yea
Hearcel F. Craig Democratic Yea
Kent Smith Democratic Yea
Nickie J. Antonio Democratic Yea
Paula Hicks-Hudson Democratic Yea
William P. DeMora Democratic Yea
Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. Democratic Yea
Al Cutrona Republican Yea
Al Landis Republican Yea
Andrew O. Brenner Republican Yea
Bill Reineke Republican Yea
Brian M. Chavez Republican Yea
George F. Lang Republican Yea
Jane M. Timken Republican Yea
Jerry C. Cirino Republican Yea
Kristina D. Roegner Republican Yea
Kyle Koehler Republican Yea
Louis W. Blessing, III Republican Yea
Mark Romanchuk Republican Yea
Michele Reynolds Republican Yea
Nathan H. Manning Republican Yea
Rob McColley Republican Yea
Sandra O'Brien Republican Yea
Shane Wilkin Republican Yea
Stephen A. Huffman Republican Yea
Steve Wilson Republican Yea
Susan Manchester Republican Yea
Terry Johnson Republican Yea
Theresa Gavarone Republican Yea
Thomas F. Patton Republican Yea
Tim Schaffer Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 324 do?
To amend sections 4773.01, 4773.02, 4773.03, and 4773.06 of the Revised Code to revise the law governing general X-ray machine operators and other radiation technicians.
Who sponsors SB 324?
SB 324 is sponsored by Stephen A. Huffman (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 324?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced November 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 324?
Track SB 324 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 324

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 324

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →