HR 9613 — Nuclear Advisory Committee Reform Act
Last action — Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced July 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This bill reforms the Nuclear Advisory Committee's structure and operations.
The Nuclear Advisory Committee Reform Act aims to change how the Nuclear Advisory Committee functions. It seeks to improve its effectiveness and responsiveness to nuclear energy issues.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html July 09, 2026
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill updates the structure and operational procedures of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards and modifies the licensing review process for nuclear reactor facilities.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
There is→ (a) Establishment.--There isChanges the introductory wording of the section to specify the establishment of the committee.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
(referred to in this section as the `Committee').
Adds a definition for referring to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards in the section.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
consisting of→ shall consist ofAlters the phrasing regarding the composition of the committee.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
and all that follows→ a maximum of 15 members, to be appointed by the Commission, who shall represent a diverse background of technical expertise relevant to the mission of the Commission.Specifies the membership criteria and expertise required for the committee members.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
(c) Terms.--
Introduces a new subsection that addresses the terms for committee members.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
The Commission→ Except as provided in paragraph (2), the CommissionClarifies the terms under which the Commission may appoint members.
-
42 U.S.C. 2039
(d) Committee Actions.--The Committee shall take the following actions:
Details the responsibilities and actions required of the committee.
-
42 U.S.C. 2232
Review by Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.--The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards established under section 29 shall--
Adds a specified review section to clarify the actions of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
-
42 U.S.C. 2203
members of the General Advisory committee established pursuant to section 26 and theRemoves specific references to the General Advisory Committee.
-
42 U.S.C. 2203
sections 281, 283, or 284→ sections 203, 205, or 207Updates the references to the applicable statutes governing member compensation.
-
42 U.S.C. 2242
Safeguards required by section 182 b.;→ Safeguards submitted under section 182 b. (if applicable);Clarifies the conditions under which safeguards should be submitted relevant to temporary operating licenses.
-
42 U.S.C. 2242
and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff's first supplement to the report prepared in response to the report of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards for the facility→ , and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff's first supplement to the report prepared in response to the report of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards for the facility (if applicable)Specifies conditions under which certain reports apply to temporary operating licenses.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
-
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
-
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Sponsors
- Diana Harshbarger · Primary
- Craig A. Goldman · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Harshbarger, Diana Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Goldman, Craig A. Republican
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 9613?
- HR 9613 is sponsored by Harshbarger, Diana (Republican) and Goldman, Craig A. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 9613?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced July 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 9613?
- Track HR 9613 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 9613
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 9613
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →