United States 119th Congress Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 2 R · 1 D cosponsors

SRES 772 — A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.

Last action — Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4117)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 48% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The resolution states that Samuel Bankman-Fried should not receive executive clemency.

This resolution expresses the Senate's view that Samuel Bankman-Fried should not be granted clemency, emphasizing the importance of upholding the law and the integrity of the financial system. It reaffirms the Senate's commitment to these principles.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

6 added · 3 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill has been updated to indicate that it was agreed to by the Senate, which signifies its progression through the legislative process. Additionally, more sponsors have been added, including Mr. Moreno, indicating broader support for the resolution. This could potentially influence the resolution's reception and advocacy moving forward.

→
Previous
Latest
772 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S.
772 Agreed to Senate (ATS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S.
Gallego (for himself and Ms.
Gallego (for himself, Ms.
Lummis) submitted the following resolution;
Lummis, and Mr.
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.
Moreno) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary July 15, 2026 Committee discharged;
considered and agreed to _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Submitted in Senate

  2. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2896)

  3. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  4. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  6. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4117)

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 544 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (544)

544 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 544 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SRES 772?
SRES 772 is sponsored by Gallego, Ruben (Democratic), Lummis, Cynthia M. (Republican), and Moreno, Bernie (Republican).
What is the current status of SRES 772?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SRES 772?
Track SRES 772 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SRES 772

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SRES 772

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →