SB 1042 — Trade: business practices; excessively increased pricing for certain goods and services during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1041'26, SB 1043'26
Last action — referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill prohibits price gouging during declared states of emergency.
This bill aims to prevent businesses from excessively raising prices on goods and services during emergencies. It establishes protections for consumers when such emergencies are declared.
What this means for you
- Consumers: This means consumers will have protections against unfair pricing during emergencies.
Summary
Trade: business practices; excessively increased pricing for certain goods and services during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1041'26, SB 1043'26
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 1042 added nine lines of text while removing eight, indicating that some details have been clarified or expanded. These changes could involve important new information or provisions that enhance the bill's effectiveness. By updating the language, lawmakers aim to make the bill clearer and more actionable, which can lead to improved implementation and understanding among stakeholders. Such adjustments are crucial in ensuring that the legislation meets its intended goals and addresses any existing gaps.
SB-1042, As Passed Senate, June 25, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(b) "Consumer food item" means an item that is used or VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 intended for use as a food, drink, confection, or condiment by a person or animal.
(h) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 limited liability company, association, trust, estate, or other legal entity.
(1) If the attorney general or a local prosecuting VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 attorney has reasonable cause to believe that an individual has information or is in possession, custody, or control of a document or other tangible object relevant to an investigation for a violation of this act, the attorney general or prosecuting attorney may serve on the individual a written demand to appear and be examined under oath, and to produce the documents or object for inspection and copying.
(2) If an individual fails to comply with the written demand VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 served under subsection (1), the attorney general or a local prosecuting attorney may file an action to enforce the demand.
(c) Strike or limit the application of unconscionable clauses VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 of contracts to avoid an unconscionable result.
For an individual, the civil fine must not be more VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 than $10,000.00 per violation.
If a witness has been or may be called to testify or provide other information at a proceeding under or related to this act, the circuit court for the county in which the proceeding is or may be held may issue, on application of the attorney general, asserting that in the attorney general's judgment the testimony or other information may be necessary to the public interest and that the witness has refused or is likely to refuse to testify, an order requiring the witness to give testimony or provide other information that the witness refuses to give or provide on the VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb 1 basis of the privilege against self-incrimination, if the court provides in its order that the witness must not be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for, or on account of, any transaction, occurrence, matter, or thing to which the witness testifies or provides other information or evidence, documentary or otherwise, and that the testimony, information, or evidence must not be used against the witness in any criminal investigation, proceeding, or trial, except a prosecution for perjury for giving a false statement or for otherwise failing to comply with the order.
Final Page VMP S00808'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1042_APS_1 vtxfqnwze4kb
View plain text versions (7)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 2 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 3 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 4 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 5 pdf
- Introduced Senate Introduced Bill pdf
Action History
-
referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
Sponsors
- Stephanie Chang · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Stephanie Chang Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 39% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chedrick Greene | Democrat | Yea |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Nay |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Nay |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Not Voting |
| Pat Outman | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 39% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greene | — | Yea |
| Outman | — | Nay |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Nay |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Nay |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Not Voting |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1042 do?
- Trade: business practices; excessively increased pricing for certain goods and services during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1041'26, SB 1043'26
- Who sponsors SB 1042?
- SB 1042 is sponsored by Stephanie Chang (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 1042?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 1042?
- Track SB 1042 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1042
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1042
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →