Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declar...
This means you may find more reasonable lodging prices during emergencies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1041 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1041.
You're tracking SB 1041
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1041 — Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26
Last action — referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
This bill prohibits excessive price increases in hotels during a state of emergency.
The bill aims to prevent hotels and lodging providers from significantly raising their prices during declared states of emergency. This is intended to protect consumers from potential price gouging during crises.
What this means for you
- Consumers: This means you may find more reasonable lodging prices during emergencies.
Summary
Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill SB 1041 includes the addition of nine new lines while removing eight previous ones. This means that some parts of the bill have been clarified or expanded upon, while others have been deemed unnecessary or redundant. These changes can be significant as they may enhance understanding, improve implementation, or better align the bill with current needs. Ultimately, these adjustments aim to make the bill more effective in addressing its intended goals.
SB-1041, As Passed Senate, June 25, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(b) "Excessively increased price" means a price that demonstrates an unjustified disparity between the average price at which a specific lodging was advertised or offered for sale or rent OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 during the 30 days immediately before a declaration of emergency and the price of lodging advertised, or offered for sale or rent, at that specific lodging during or reasonably after a declaration of emergency.
Short-term rental does not include the rental of a hotel, motel, hotel condominium, home, or condominium unit that is located within a resort that offers OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 amenities such as golf, skiing, restaurant facility, or group meeting accommodation where the resort manages the rental of such dwelling units, or a bed and breakfast establishment.
(b) Describe the nature of the conduct constituting the OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 violation under investigation.
OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 (3) An action filed under subsection (2) must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the individual resides or in which the individual maintains a principal place of business within this state, or in the circuit court for the county of Ingham.
(3) The court after a hearing may appoint a receiver or order sequestration of the defendant's assets if it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant threatens or is about OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 to remove, conceal, or dispose of the defendant's assets to the detriment of members of the class.
(2) This state, a political subdivision, or a public agency injured directly or indirectly by a violation of this act may bring OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief, actual damages sustained by reason of a violation of this act and, as determined by the court, interest on those damages from the date of the complaint, and taxable costs.
If a witness has been or may be called to testify or provide other information at a proceeding under or related to this act, the circuit court for the county in which the proceeding is or may be held may issue, on application of the attorney general, asserting that in the attorney general's judgment the testimony or other information may be necessary to the public interest and that the witness has refused or is likely to refuse to testify, an order requiring the witness to give testimony or provide other information that the witness refuses to give or provide on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination, if the court provides in its order that the witness shall not be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for, or on account of, any transaction, occurrence, matter, or thing to which the witness testifies or provides other information or evidence, documentary or otherwise, and that the testimony, information, or evidence must OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93 1 not be used against the witness in any criminal investigation, proceeding, or trial, except a prosecution for perjury for giving a false statement or for otherwise failing to comply with the order.
Final Page OOH S00807'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 qe3z09hmgc93
View plain text versions (7)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 2 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 3 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 4 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 5 pdf
- Introduced Senate Introduced Bill pdf
Action History
-
referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
Sponsors
- Jeremy Moss · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jeremy Moss Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 39% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chedrick Greene | Democrat | Yea |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Nay |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Nay |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Not Voting |
| Pat Outman | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 39% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greene | — | Yea |
| Outman | — | Nay |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Nay |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Nay |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Not Voting |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1041 do?
- Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26
- Who sponsors SB 1041?
- SB 1041 is sponsored by Jeremy Moss (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 1041?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 1041?
- Track SB 1041 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1041
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1041
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →