Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 1041 — Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26

Last action — referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Advancing 48% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

This bill prohibits excessive price increases in hotels during a state of emergency.

The bill aims to prevent hotels and lodging providers from significantly raising their prices during declared states of emergency. This is intended to protect consumers from potential price gouging during crises.

What this means for you
  • Consumers: This means you may find more reasonable lodging prices during emergencies.

Summary

Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

9 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Bill SB 1041 includes the addition of nine new lines while removing eight previous ones. This means that some parts of the bill have been clarified or expanded upon, while others have been deemed unnecessary or redundant. These changes can be significant as they may enhance understanding, improve implementation, or better align the bill with current needs. Ultimately, these adjustments aim to make the bill more effective in addressing its intended goals.

→
Previous
Latest
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
SB-1041, As Passed Senate, June 25, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(b) "Excessively increased price" means a price that demonstrates an unjustified disparity between the average price at which a specific lodging was advertised or offered for sale or rent OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 during the 30 days immediately before a declaration of emergency and the price of lodging advertised, or offered for sale or rent, at that specific lodging during or reasonably after a declaration of emergency.
(b) "Excessively increased price" means a price that demonstrates an unjustified disparity between the average price at which a specific lodging was advertised or offered for sale or rent OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 during the 30 days immediately before a declaration of emergency and the price of lodging advertised, or offered for sale or rent, at that specific lodging during or reasonably after a declaration of emergency.
Short-term rental does not include the rental of a hotel, motel, hotel condominium, home, or condominium unit that is located within a resort that offers OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 amenities such as golf, skiing, restaurant facility, or group meeting accommodation where the resort manages the rental of such dwelling units, or a bed and breakfast establishment.
Short-term rental does not include the rental of a hotel, motel, hotel condominium, home, or condominium unit that is located within a resort that offers OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 amenities such as golf, skiing, restaurant facility, or group meeting accommodation where the resort manages the rental of such dwelling units, or a bed and breakfast establishment.
(b) Describe the nature of the conduct constituting the OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 violation under investigation.
(b) Describe the nature of the conduct constituting the OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 violation under investigation.
OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 (3) An action filed under subsection (2) must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the individual resides or in which the individual maintains a principal place of business within this state, or in the circuit court for the county of Ingham.
OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 (3) An action filed under subsection (2) must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the individual resides or in which the individual maintains a principal place of business within this state, or in the circuit court for the county of Ingham.
(3) The court after a hearing may appoint a receiver or order sequestration of the defendant's assets if it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant threatens or is about OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 to remove, conceal, or dispose of the defendant's assets to the detriment of members of the class.
(3) The court after a hearing may appoint a receiver or order sequestration of the defendant's assets if it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant threatens or is about OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 to remove, conceal, or dispose of the defendant's assets to the detriment of members of the class.
(2) This state, a political subdivision, or a public agency injured directly or indirectly by a violation of this act may bring OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief, actual damages sustained by reason of a violation of this act and, as determined by the court, interest on those damages from the date of the complaint, and taxable costs.
(2) This state, a political subdivision, or a public agency injured directly or indirectly by a violation of this act may bring OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief, actual damages sustained by reason of a violation of this act and, as determined by the court, interest on those damages from the date of the complaint, and taxable costs.
If a witness has been or may be called to testify or provide other information at a proceeding under or related to this act, the circuit court for the county in which the proceeding is or may be held may issue, on application of the attorney general, asserting that in the attorney general's judgment the testimony or other information may be necessary to the public interest and that the witness has refused or is likely to refuse to testify, an order requiring the witness to give testimony or provide other information that the witness refuses to give or provide on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination, if the court provides in its order that the witness shall not be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for, or on account of, any transaction, occurrence, matter, or thing to which the witness testifies or provides other information or evidence, documentary or otherwise, and that the testimony, information, or evidence must OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09 1 not be used against the witness in any criminal investigation, proceeding, or trial, except a prosecution for perjury for giving a false statement or for otherwise failing to comply with the order.
If a witness has been or may be called to testify or provide other information at a proceeding under or related to this act, the circuit court for the county in which the proceeding is or may be held may issue, on application of the attorney general, asserting that in the attorney general's judgment the testimony or other information may be necessary to the public interest and that the witness has refused or is likely to refuse to testify, an order requiring the witness to give testimony or provide other information that the witness refuses to give or provide on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination, if the court provides in its order that the witness shall not be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for, or on account of, any transaction, occurrence, matter, or thing to which the witness testifies or provides other information or evidence, documentary or otherwise, and that the testimony, information, or evidence must OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93 1 not be used against the witness in any criminal investigation, proceeding, or trial, except a prosecution for perjury for giving a false statement or for otherwise failing to comply with the order.
Final Page OOH S00807'25 (S-1) qe3z09
Final Page OOH S00807'25 (S-1)_SB1041_APS_1 hmgc93
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 15 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 20 Yea · 15 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 20000
Republican 01503
Total 201503
% of votes cast 53%39%0%8%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Chedrick Greene Democrat Yea
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Yea
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Yea
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Nay
Dan Lauwers Republican Nay
Edward McBroom Republican Nay
Jim Runestad Republican Not Voting
John Damoose Republican Nay
Jon Bumstead Republican Nay
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Not Voting
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Nay
Lana Theis Republican Nay
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Nay
Michele Hoitenga Republican Not Voting
Pat Outman Republican Nay
Roger Hauck Republican Nay
Roger Victory Republican Nay
Ruth Johnson Republican Nay
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

PASSED

Passed 20 Yea · 15 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 19000
Unaffiliated 1100
Republican 01403
Total 201503
% of votes cast 53%39%0%8%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Greene — Yea
Outman — Nay
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Yea
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Yea
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Nay
Dan Lauwers Republican Nay
Edward McBroom Republican Nay
Jim Runestad Republican Not Voting
John Damoose Republican Nay
Jon Bumstead Republican Nay
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Not Voting
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Nay
Lana Theis Republican Nay
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Nay
Michele Hoitenga Republican Not Voting
Roger Hauck Republican Nay
Roger Victory Republican Nay
Ruth Johnson Republican Nay
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1041 do?
Housing: public accommodations; excessively increased pricing in hotel and lodging industry during a declared state of emergency; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1042'26, SB 1043'26
Who sponsors SB 1041?
SB 1041 is sponsored by Jeremy Moss (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 1041?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 1041?
Track SB 1041 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1041

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1041

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →