HR 373 — SAGA Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).
-
Spreading across states
Near-identical bills in 1 other state — cross-state momentum.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Second Amendment Guarantee Act or the SAGA Act This bill prohibits a state or local government from establishing a regulation, prohibition, or registration or licensing requirement with respect to a rifle or shotgun that is more restrictive (or that imposes a greater penalty or tax) than federal law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html January 13, 2025
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing law to limit the authority of states and localities to regulate rifles and shotguns.
-
18 U.S.C. § 927
No provision of this chapter shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision operates to the exclusion of the law of any State on the same subject matter, unless there is a direct and positive conflict between such provision and the law of the State so that the two cannot be reconciled or consistently stand together.→ (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), no provision of this chapter shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision operates to the exclusion of the law of any State on the same subject matter, unless there is a direct and positive conflict between such provision and the law of the State so that the two cannot be reconciled or consistently stand together. (b)(1) A State or a political subdivision of a State may not impose any regulation, prohibition, or registration or licensing requirement with respect to the design, manufacture, importation, sale, transfer, possession, or marking of a rifle or shotgun that has moved in, or any such conduct that affects, interstate or foreign commerce, that is more restrictive, or impose any penalty, tax, fee, or charge with respect to such a rifle or shotgun or such conduct, in an amount greater, than is provided under Federal law. To the extent that a law of a State or political subdivision of a State, whether enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, violates the preceding sentence, the law shall have no force or effect. For purposes of this subsection, the term 'rifle or shotgun' includes any part of a rifle or shotgun, any detachable magazine or ammunition feeding device, and any type of pistol grip or stock design. (2) In an action brought for damages or relief from a violation of paragraph (1), the court shall award the prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorney's fee in addition to any other damages or relief awarded.This change adds a new limitation that restricts state and local regulations on rifles and shotguns, establishing that such laws cannot be more restrictive than federal laws.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Claudia Tenney · Primary
- Doug LaMalfa · Cosponsor
- Nicholas A. Langworthy · Cosponsor
- Jeff Crank · Cosponsor
- Abraham J. Hamadeh · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 542 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Tenney, Claudia Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- LaMalfa, Doug Republican
- Langworthy, Nicholas A. Republican
- Crank, Jeff Republican
- Hamadeh, Abraham J. Republican
Not signed on (542)
542 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 542 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Similar bills in other states
Bills in other jurisdictions that match this one by MEANING — title, summary and subject, compared across every state we track. A strong signal the same policy is moving elsewhere.
- HR 374 Texas 92% Compare text
Pick a bill from “Similar bills” above and click Compare text to see how its language differs from HR 373.
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 373 do?
- Second Amendment Guarantee Act or the SAGA Act This bill prohibits a state or local government from establishing a regulation, prohibition, or registration or licensing requirement with respect to a rifle or shotgun that is more restrictive (or that imposes a greater penalty or tax) than federal law.
- Who sponsors HR 373?
- HR 373 is sponsored by Tenney, Claudia (Republican), LaMalfa, Doug (Republican), Langworthy, Nicholas A. (Republican), Crank, Jeff (Republican), and Hamadeh, Abraham J. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 373?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 373?
- Track HR 373 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 373
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 373
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →