2026-02649: Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations; Reopening of Comment Period; Denial of Extension
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
This action denies requests for extension of the reopening of the comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled "Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations" that was published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2026.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
The rule, in full
826 words as published, February 10, 2026. View the original →
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2026) [Federal Register Volume 91, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2026)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 5880] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-02649] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 36, 43, 45, 48, 89, 91, 107, 108, 119, 133, 135, 137, and 146 [Docket No. FAA-2025-1908; Notice No. 25-07C] RIN 2120-AL82 Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations; Reopening of Comment Period; Denial of Extension
Agency
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
Action
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Reopening of comment period; Denial of extension. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
This action denies requests for extension of the reopening of the comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations'' that was published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2026.
For Further Information Contact
Michelle Ferritto, ARM-100, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20592; Phone: (844) 359-6982; Email: [email protected].
Supplementary Information
On August 7, 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations'' in the Federal Register (90 FR 38212; Notice No. 25-07). In that document, FAA proposed performance-based regulations to enable the design and operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) mostly at low altitudes beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) and for third-party services that support these operations including UAS Traffic Management. The comment period for the NPRM closed on October 6, 2025. During the comment period that closed on October 2025, FAA received significant comments on its proposals related to right-of-way rules, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out, electronic conspicuity, and detect-and-avoid. Noting the substantial interest in, and comment on, these policies, FAA published a notice to reopen the NPRM comment period in the Federal Register on January 28, 2026 (91 FR 3695; Notice No. 25-07B). The notice asks seven questions to solicit comments limited to electronic conspicuity and right-of-way to ensure FAA fully understands these comments and the relevant policy implications. Denial of Extension of Reopened Comment Period On January 31, 2026, FAA received a request for extension of the reopened comment period from James E. Whedbee, ``until February 28, 2026, or such time thereafter as the Administrator deems appropriate is in the public interest.'' \1\ FAA has considered and hereby denies this request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Comment from James E. Whedbee, Docket FAA-2025-1908-3170 (Jan. 31, 2026). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The commenter asserted that topics of the questions asked by the FAA are sufficiently complex to warrant a thoughtful response that may require more time than the reopened comment period permits. While the topics of the questions are complex, FAA asserts that the reopened comment period provides sufficient opportunity for interested persons to provide feedback on the limited topics given they are topics that were already broached in the NPRM. During the initial 60-day comment period, FAA received approximately 3,100 comments on the totality of the rule many of which referenced the topics on which FAA has solicited additional comment. Noting that, FAA finds that 14 days is sufficient to obtain comment on the limited topics described in the January 28, 2026, notice. The commenter also asserted an extension should be granted because a lapse in funding impacting the Department of Transportation has interrupted the reopened comment period. FAA disagrees as the lapse in funding does not impact the ability for commenters to review the NPRM, the request for comments, or to submit comments. Further, the commenter asserted the reopened comment period should be extended because other federal agencies impacted by the partial lapse in funding would miss their opportunity to comment. FAA disagrees with this assertion as other federal agencies have the opportunity to review the final rule and provide comments during the interagency coordination process handled by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs pursuant to E.O. 12866 for significant rulemakings, a process that is independent of the notice and comment process under the Administrative Procedure Act.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See 5 U.S.C. 553(c) (summary of notice and comment rulemaking). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The commenter also asserted that no person would be prejudiced by extending the reopening of the comment period. FAA disagrees, as keeping the reopened comment period open for an extended period on these limited topics could delay finalizing this rule. This delay would negatively impact other stakeholders, including UAS operators, manufacturers, standards organizations, and providers of supporting third-party services as they rely on the finalization of this rule to build and scale their operations. Accordingly, FAA declines to grant the extension requests and the reopened comment period will close on February 11, 2026. Issued under authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and 44701, in Washington, DC. Brandon Roberts, Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration. [FR Doc. 2026-02649 Filed 2-9-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
What this changes
Amends 13 parts of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
- 14 CFR 36 Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification
- 14 CFR 43 Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration
- 14 CFR 45 Identification and Registration Marking
- 14 CFR 48 Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft
- 14 CFR 89 Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft
- 14 CFR 91 General Operating and Flight Rules
- 14 CFR 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- 14 CFR 108
- 14 CFR 119 Certification: Air Carriers and Commercial Operators
- 14 CFR 133 Rotorcraft External-Load Operations
- 14 CFR 135 Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft
- 14 CFR 137 Agricultural Aircraft Operations
- 14 CFR 146
Rulemaking docket
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Letter- CDA/ AUVSI to FAA Re: Technical Assistance
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 202512.22.23 Industry letter to FAA
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Letter of Intent North Texas Shared Airspace
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Supporting Statement Automated Data Service Providers with Appendix
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Supporting Statement – Applying for an Operating Permit with Appendix
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Letter from CDA -Ellman to FAA with response from William McKenna
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Draft AC -146
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Privacy Impact Assesspent Part 108
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Supporting Statement PRA MOC DOC
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Johns Hopkins Ground Risk Assessment
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Johns Hopkins Conformance Monitoring Assessment
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Letter from AUVSI to Michael Whitaker 07.25.2024 with response from Michael Whitaker
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Supporting Statement PRA Service Difficulty Reports
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Draft AC 108-XX
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Population Density Maps Description
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Supporting Statement PRA Hazmat
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Draft Order 7400.XX
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Johns Hopkins Initial Safety Assessment of UTM
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Memo to Docket 06.12.2024 Ex Parte Communication Small UAV Coalition
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Memo summarizing listening session 10.11.2023
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Letter from Hon. Menedez and Yakim to Michael Whitaker with letters from Michael Whitaker in response
-
Supporting & Related Material August 07, 2025Memo summarizing listening session 03.01.2023; Updated Multisector Chart FAA UAS Listening Session 03.01.2023
-
Notice August 14, 2025Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations
-
Supporting & Related Material September 12, 2025Memorandum to the Docket
-
Supporting & Related Material September 17, 2025Memorandum to the Docket
-
Supporting & Related Material September 25, 20252120-AL82 Memorandum to the Docket Outreach for Meeting with CDA
-
Supporting & Related Material September 29, 20252120-AL82 Memorandum to the Docket for Meeting with CDA
-
Proposed Rule September 29, 2025Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations
-
Supporting & Related Material October 02, 20252120-AL82 Memorandum to the Docket Meeting with Yurok Tribe
-
Supporting & Related Material October 02, 20252120-AL82 Memorandum to the Docket Meeting with Monacan Indian Nation
-
Supporting & Related Material October 02, 20252120-AL82 Memorandum to the Docket Meeting with EASA
-
Supporting & Related Material January 15, 2026U.S. DOT/FAA – Memoranda to the Docket from Listening Sessions
-
Proposed Rule January 28, 2026Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations; Reopening of Comment Period
-
Proposed Rule February 10, 2026Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations; Reopening of Comment Period; Denial of Extension
Public comments
What people are saying
-
Vertical Aviation International (VAI) 2026-07-10
“A group of 12 aviation industry organizations are submitting this letter to Docket No. FAA-2025-1908 for consideration, reiterating concerns about the detect and avoid (DAA) elements in the upcoming Part 108 final rule.”
-
Anonymous commenter 2026-02-26
“See Attached”
-
Anonymous commenter 2026-02-19
“See Attached”
-
Anonymous commenter 2026-02-12
“4. Would the performance requirements of §91.227 applicable to ADS-B Out also be appropriate for alternate EC devices? OAIRE Response OAIRE does not believe that the full performance requirements of §91.227 applicable to ADS-B Out are appropriate for alternate electronic conspicuity (EC) devices contemplated under the proposed Part 108 rule. ADS-B Out performance requirements were developed for installed, continuously powered avionics systems designed to support air traffic surveillance and services across the NAS. By contrast, the NPRM’s alternate EC concept is intended to support a much n...”
2,844 more characters
-
Michael Yamakawa 2026-02-12
“1. Are there alternate EC devices capable of complying with proposed § 108.195(a)(2)(ii) that are available today? What are the names and manufacturers of those devices? Where are the devices currently approved for use and for what purpose(s)? Do any of them have the capability to inform the user that the device is not working properly? There are currently no EC devices on the US market that comply with the proposed language. There are no known manufacturers at the scale required to meet the proposed requirements. Outside of the US, there are examples of portable, ADS‑B IN/OUT EC devices ...”
2,890 more characters
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Documents
- Full text (Federal Register) · February 10, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →