2026-12935: Air Quality Plan; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Rescissions of Outdated Requirements Within Riverside County
Public comment closed · opened June 26, 2026.
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or "District") portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern prohibitory rules that regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>) under the Clean Air Act (CAA or "Act") within the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. We are proposing to approve the rescissions of the rules because the requirements in the rules are no longer necessary to retain in the SIP to meet CAA requirements.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
The rule, in full
6,015 words as published, June 26, 2026. View the original →
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 122 (Friday, June 26, 2026) [Federal Register Volume 91, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2026)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 38576-38582] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-12935] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2026-4489; FRL-13421-01-R9] Air Quality Plan; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Rescissions of Outdated Requirements Within Riverside County
Agency
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Action
Proposed rule. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or ``District'') portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern prohibitory rules that regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') within the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. We are proposing to approve the rescissions of the rules because the requirements in the rules are no longer necessary to retain in the SIP to meet CAA requirements.
Dates
Comments must be received on or before July 27, 2026.
Addresses
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2026-4489 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For Further Information Contact
La Kenya Evans-Hopper, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; telephone number: (415) 972- 3245; email address: [email protected].
Supplementary Information
Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What is the background for this proposed action? B. Which rules did the State request for rescission? C. What was the purpose of the SIP-approved rules, and what is the purpose of the State's rescission request? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the requests for rescission? B. Do the rule rescissions meet the evaluation criteria? C. Proposed Action and Public Comment III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. What is the background for this proposed action?
Under the CAA, the EPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for certain pervasive air pollutants, including, among others, ozone and particulate matter (PM). Under CAA section 110(a), states are required to adopt and submit SIPs to implement, maintain, and enforce the NAAQS. Under CAA section 107(d), the EPA has designated all areas [[Page 38577]] of the country as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable for the NAAQS. Areas designated as nonattainment must adopt and submit SIP revisions that, among other things, provide for attainment of the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date. The MDAQMD regulates sources of air pollution within California's ``Mojave Desert Air Basin,'' which lies within the previously- designated ``Southeast Desert Air Basin.'' \1\ The MDAQMD's jurisdiction includes the desert portion of San Bernardino County and the far eastern portion of Riverside County. A portion of San Bernardino County within the District is also in the West Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment area.\2\ The Riverside County portion of the District is designated as unclassifiable/attainment for all the NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The two air basins are described in the California Air Resources Board's (CARB's), ``Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Rulemaking, Proposed Amendments to Divide the Southeast Desert Air Basin and to Modify the Boundary of the South Coast Air Basin and Proposed Amendments to the Related Agricultural Burning Regulations,'' April 1996. San Bernardino County is a large county covering over 20,000 square miles, the majority of which is desert within the Mojave Desert (also known locally as the ``High Desert'' based on its elevation). MDAQMD's jurisdiction in the Palo Verde Valley portion of Riverside County covers an area approximately 30 miles wide along the eastern boundary of the county adjoining the State of Arizona. See also, https://www.mdaqmd.ca.gov/about-us/district-boundaries. \2\ 40 CFR 81.305. The West Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment area also includes the Antelope Valley portion of Los Angeles County. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 1972, when the original California SIP was submitted and approved by the EPA, the San Bernardino County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) had jurisdiction over stationary sources within all of San Bernardino County, and Riverside County Air Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) had jurisdiction over stationary sources within all of Riverside County. On July 16, 1975, the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District (LACAPCD), Orange County Air Pollution Control District (OCAPCD), RCAPCD, and SBCAPCD were unified into the Southern California Air Pollution Control District (SoCalAPCD). On February 1, 1977, California split the SoCalAPCD into four agencies. The western coastal area became regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the remaining eastern desert portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties were seperated back into air pollution control districts for each county (i.e., LACAPCD, SBCAPCD, and RCAPCD). The original jurisdiction of the SCAQMD covered an area referred to as the ``South Coast Air Basin'' that included all of Orange County and the western non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The jurisdiction of the LACAPCD, SBCAPCD, and RCAPCD extended over a portion of an air basin referred to as the ``Southeast Desert Air Basin.'' \3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ 43 FR 25684 (June 14, 1978). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Southeast Desert Air Basin portion of Riverside County was added to the SCAQMD on December 1, 1977. Effective December 1, 1977, under state law, all SCAQMD Rules and Regulations became applicable within the Southeast Desert Air Basin portion of Riverside County.\4\ In 1982, the applicability of SCAQMD rules that had been approved as part of the California SIP was extended to the Southeast Desert Air Basin portion of Riverside County.\5\ On July 1, 1993, the SBCAPCD was re-formed as the MDAQMD with jurisdiction in the desert portion of San Bernardino County. On July 1, 1994, the Palo Verde Valley area in far eastern Riverside County (and that is a part of the Southeast Desert Air Basin portion of Riverside County) left the SCAQMD and joined the MDAQMD.\6\ No changes to the District's boundaries have been made since 1994 and, as stated above, today the MDAQMD's jurisdiction is within the Mojave Desert Air Basin and consists of the desert portion of San Bernardino County and the Palo Verde Valley area in the far eastern portion of Riverside County. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Letter dated August 11, 1980, from Gary Rubenstein, Deputy Executive Officer, CARB to Paul DeFalco, Jr., EPA Regional Administrator--approved at 47 FR 25013 (June 9, 1982). \5\ 47 FR 25013 (June 9, 1982). \6\ The Palo Verde Valley portion of the MDAQMD covers an area approximately 30 miles wide along the eastern boundary of the county adjoining the State of Arizona. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- An outgrowth of the complicated regulatory history of the MDAQMD is that the applicable portion of the California SIP for the area the District regulates consists of a mixture of rules from current and former agencies. Rules adopted by MDAQMD apply ``District-wide,'' meaning to the desert portion of San Bernardino County and the Palo Verde Valley area in the far eastern portion of Riverside County, while SBCAPCD rules apply only in the San Bernardino County portion of the District and rules adopted by the RCAPCD, SoCalAPCD or the SCAQMD apply only in the Riverside County portion of the District.
B. Which rules did the State request for rescission?
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted revisions to the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP, including MDAQMD rules and rescissions, to the EPA for approval on the following dates: September 10, 2024,\7\ and November 15, 2024.\8\ The purpose of these submissions is to align the SIP versions of the rules with the versions in effect in the MDAQMD.9 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ CARB submitted the SIP revision electronically on September 10, 2024 as an enclosure to a transmittal letter dated September 9, 2024. \8\ CARB submitted the SIP revision electronically on November 15, 2024 as an enclosure to a transmittal letter dated November 13, 2024. \9\ Letter dated September 9, 2024, from Steven S. Cliff, Ph.D., Executive Officer, CARB to Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX. \10\ Letter dated November 13, 2024, from Steven S. Cliff, Ph.D., Executive Officer, CARB to Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 1 lists rules submitted for District-wide applicability with the dates they were adopted by the MDAQMD, previously approved by the EPA, and re-submitted to the EPA by CARB to extend applicability throughout the District. Table 2 lists the rules submitted for rescission from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the SIP that are covered by this proposed action with the dates that they were adopted by the MDAQMD, the dates they were submitted by CARB, and the dates (and associated Federal Register citations) that the rules were previously approved by the EPA. Table 1--Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District SIP Rules Submitted for District-Wide Applicability -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule No. Title Local adoption date SIP approval date FR citation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 442................... Usage of Solvents.... February 27, 2006..................... September 17, 2007.................... 72 FR 52791. 1102.................. Fugitive Emissions of October 26, 1994...................... September 27, 1995.................... 60 FR 49772. VOCs from Components at Pipeline Transfer Stations. 1104.................. Organic Solvent April 23, 2018........................ July 2, 2019.......................... 84 FR 31682. Degreasing Operations. [[Page 38578]] 1115.................. Metal Parts and June 8, 2020.......................... May 9, 2022........................... 87 FR 27526. Products Coating Operations. 1116.................. Automotive August 23, 2010....................... August 9, 2012........................ 77 FR 47536. Refinishing Operations. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2--South Coast Air Quality Management District SIP Rule Rescissions Submitted for Approval -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIP approval date Rule No. Title Adopted/ amended date and FR citation Date of rescission by MDAQMD Submittal date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1103................ Pharmaceuticals and April 4, 1980............... July 8, 1982; 47 FR April 22, 2024.............. November 15, 2024. Cosmetics 29668. Manufacturing Operations. 1115................ Motor Vehicle March 6, 1992............... December 20, 1993; March 25, 2024.............. September 10, 2024. Assembly Line 58 FR 66282. Coating Operations. 1125................ Metal Container, August 2, 1991.............. April 14; 1994, 59 April 22, 2024.............. November 15, 2024. Closure, and Coil FR 17697. Coating Operations. 1126................ Magnet Wire Coating March 6, 1992............... December 20, 1993; April 22, 2024.............. November 15, 2024. Operations. 58 FR 66285. 1151................ Motor Vehicle and September 6, 1991........... December 20, 1993; March 25, 2024.............. September 10, 2024. Mobile Equipment 58 FR 66282. Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations. 1153................ Commercial Bakery January 4, 1991............. September 29, 1993; June 24, 2024............... November 15, 2024. Ovens. 58 FR 50850. 1159................ Nitric Acid Units-- December 6, 1985............ July 12, 1990; 55 June 24, 2024............... November 15, 2024. Oxides of Nitrogen. FR 28622. 1173................ Fugitive Emissions December 7, 1990............ October 26, 1992; April 22, 2024.............. September 10, 2024. of Volatile 57 FR 48457; Organic Compounds. corrected on January 16, 2004; 69 FR 2509. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As noted previously, the far eastern portion of Riverside County, referred to as the Palo Verde Valley, joined the MDAQMD effective July 1, 1994. Because the EPA approved the rules in Table 1 as part of the California SIP after July 1, 1994, the date on which Palo Verde Valley portion of Riverside County left the SCAQMD and joined the MDAQMD, these rules already apply throughout the entire present jurisdiction of the MDAQMD. No further action by the EPA is needed to address the request to apply these rules District-wide in the SIP. As part of the November 15, 2024 SIP submission, the District and CARB also requested acknowledgement by the EPA that certain previously- approved SCAQMD Rules listed in Table 3 have already been removed from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. Table 3--South Coast Air Quality Management District SIP Rules Previously Removed From the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Portion of the California SIP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIP approval date Removed from SIP Rule No. Title Adopted/ amended date and FR citation date; FR citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1107................ Miscellaneous Metal August 2, 1991.............. December 20, 1993; December 12, 1997; Parts, Products 58 FR 66285. 62 FR 67002; see and Coating also, May 9, Operations. 2022; 87 FR 27526. 1122................ Solvent Metal July 8, 1983................ October 3, 1984; 49 April 30, 1996; 61 Cleaners FR 39057. FR 18962 (partial (Degreasers). supersession); and September 17, 2007; 72 FR 5279 (supersession of remainder). 1171................ Solvent Cleaning August 2, 1991.............. December 20, 1993; July 2, 2019; 84 Operations. 58 FR 66285. FR 31682. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As to SCAQMD Rule 1107, ``Miscellaneous Metal Parts, Products and Coating Operations,'' (amended August 2, 1991) we confirm that the rule was superseded in the Riverside County portion of MDAQMD by approval of MDAQMD Rule 1115, ``Metal Parts and Products Coating Operations,'' (amended June 8, 2020) on December 23, 1997 (62 FR 67002; promulgated at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(2)); see also, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(193)(i)(A)(4). No further action is required by EPA to confirm this prior action. As to SCAQMD Rule 1122, ``Solvent Metal Cleaners (Degreasers),'' (amended July 8, 1983) we confirm that the rule was superseded in the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD in part by approval of MDAQMD Rule 1104, ``Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations,'' (adopted September 28, 1994) on April 30, 1996 (61 FR 18962; promulgated at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(207)(i)(D)(2)) and later in final part by approval of MDAQMD Rule 442, ``Usage of Solvents,'' (amended February 27, 2006) on September 17, 2007 (72 FR 52791; promulgated at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(347)(i)(C)(1)). This [[Page 38579]] change was not previously reflected at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(148)(vi), and we intend to correct this in our final action. As to SCAQMD Rule 1171, ``Solvent Cleaning Operations,'' (amended August 2, 1991) we confirm that the rule was superseded in the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD by approval of MDAQMD Rule 1104, ``Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations,'' (amended on April 23, 2018) on July 2, 2019 (84 FR 31682) and promulgated at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(519)(i)(A)(1)). This change was not previously reflected at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(188)(i)(C), and we intend to correct this in our final action. The September 10, 2024 SIP submission,\11\ and the November 15, 2024 SIP submission \12\ were deemed complete by operation of law with respect to the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V on March 10, 2025 and May 15, 2025, respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ Letter dated September 9, 2024 from Steven S. Cliff, Ph.D., Executive Officer, CARB to Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX. \12\ Letter dated November 13, 2024 from Steven S. Cliff, Ph.D., Executive Officer, CARB to Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What was the purpose of the SIP-approved rules, and what is the
purpose of the State's rescission request? Emissions of VOCs and NOX contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog, and particulate matter (PM) which harm human health and the environment. Emissions of PM, including PM equal to or less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and PM equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10), contribute to effects that are harmful to human health and the environment, including premature mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. CAA section 110(a) requires States to submit regulations that control emissions of criteria air pollutants or their precursors, including VOC and NOX, as part of the SIP. Over the years, MDAQMD's predecessor agency in the Riverside County portion of the District, the SCAQMD, adopted many administrative and prohibitory rules to meet SIP requirements, including those that are the subject of this proposed action, that remain in the applicable SIP for the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD. The purpose of the SIP submissions in this rulemaking is to align the SIP versions of the rules with those that are in effect in the MDAQMD. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about these rules.
A. How is the EPA evaluating the requests for rescission?
Under CAA section 110(l), SIP revisions must be adopted by the state, and the state must provide for reasonable public notice and hearing prior to adoption.\13\ Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). In approving new requirements into the SIP or removing existing requirements from the SIP, we consider whether these CAA requirements are met. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ The EPA has reviewed the SIP submissions covered in this proposed action for compliance with CAA procedural requirements and found that all such requirements have been met. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Generally, SIP rules must require implementation of Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of VOCs and NOX in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)). A portion of the San Bernardino County portion of the MDAQMD is part of an ozone nonattainment area (referred to as ``West Mojave Desert'') that is classified as Severe for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS.\14\ However, as noted previously, the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD is unclassifiable or attainment for all of the NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 40 CFR 81.305. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990).
2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
3. Letter dated February 12, 1990, from Johnnie L. Pearson, Chief
Regional Activities Section, ROB, to Chief, Air Branch, Region I-X, Subject: ``Review of State Regulation Recodifications.''
B. Do the rule recissions meet the evaluation criteria?
As noted above, the purpose for the submission of the MDAQMD rules and rescissions is to align the versions of the rules that are part of the SIP with the versions found in the current District rulebook. Below, we summarize our evaluation of the rescission requests for the SCAQMD rules in Table 2 for which there are no applicable sources and are replaced with SIP-approve MDAQMD rules. Then we considered the rescission requests for the SCAQMD rules in Table 3 for which there are corresponding MDAQMD rules. The EPA's TSD contains additional details about our evaluation. Rescission of SCAQMD Rules 1103, 1115, 1126, 1153, and 1159 The EPA has previously approved negative declarations certifying that the following types of sources are not located within the West Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment area: motor vehicle assembly plants and automotive manufacturing operations,\15\ petroleum refinery industry and chemical manufacturing industry,\16\ manufacturing of synthesized pharmaceutical products,\17\ operations for the surface coating of cans, containers, and coils,\18\ operations for [[Page 38580]] the surface coating of magnet wire,\19\ commercial bakery ovens (i.e., large enough to be subject to SCAQMD Rule 1153, ``Commercial Bakery Ovens,'' (amended May 13, 1991) (``SCAQMD Rule 1153'')),\20\ and nitric and adipic acid manufacturing plants.\21\ The District indicated that its analysis for the negative declarations included the entire MDAQMD and not just the West Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment area. The EPA has also confirmed the absence of these types of sources in the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD using Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes \22\ and CARB's facility search tool California Emissions Inventory Data Analysis and Reporting System (CEIDARS) emissions database.\23\ Based on the absence of applicable sources in the MDAQMD, the EPA concludes that the recission of these rules would not interfere with attainment and RFP or any other requirement of the Act for the purposes of CAA section 110(l): SCAQMD Rule 1103, ``Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics Manufacturing Operations,'' (amended April 4, 1980) (``Rule 1103), SCAQMD Rule 1115, ``Motor Vehicle Assembly Line Coating Operations,'' (amended March 6, 1992) (``SCAQMD Rule 1115''), SCAQMD Rule 1126, ``Magnet Wire Coating Operations,'' (amended March 6, 1992) (``SCAQMD Rule 1126''), SCAQMD Rule 1153, and SCAQMD Rule 1159, ``Nitric Acid Units--Oxides of Nitrogen (amended February 10, 1986) (``SCAQMD Rule 1159''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) Cleanup: Rescission of SCAQMD Rules 1115--Motor Vehicle Assembly Line Coating Operations and 1151--Motor Vehicle & Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations as they appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District and acknowledge that SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1116--Automotive Refinishing Operations along with various Federal Negative Declarations have replaced such rescinded rules in the SIP,'' March 24, 2024, p. 3. \16\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) Cleanup: Specifically, the Rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1173--Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds as it appears in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District and to acknowledge that currently SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1102 along with various SIP approved Federal Negative Declarations adequately regulate the source categories,'' (``MDAQMD Staff Report Rule 1173''), April 22, 2024, p. 4. \17\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan Cleanup: Specifically, the rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules 1103--Pharmaceuticals & Cosmetics Manufacturing Operations, as they appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District in Riverside County,'' April 22, 2024, p. 8. The specific CTG is, ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products,'' EPA-450/2-78-029, December 1978. \18\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan Cleanup: Specifically, the Rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules: 1125--Metal Container, Closure and Coil Coating Operations, and 1126--Magnet Wire Coating Operations as they appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District and to acknowledge that SCAQMD Rule 1107--Miscellaneous Metal Parts, Products and Coating Operations has been rescinded from the SIP as previously requested, and that the currently SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1115--Metal Parts & Products Coating Operations, along with various SIP approved Federal Negative Declarations adequately regulate the source categories,'' (``MDAQMD Staff Report for SCAQMD Rules 1107, 1125, and 1126 and MDAQMD Rule 1115'') April 22, 2024, pp. 24-25. \19\ MDAQMD Staff Report for SCAQMD Rules 1107, 1125, and 1126 and MDAQMD Rule 1115, pp. 24-25. \20\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan Cleanup: Specifically, the Rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1153--Commercial Bakery Ovens as it appears appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.'' June 28, 2024, p. 8. \21\ MDAQMD, Staff Report, ``State Implementation Plan Cleanup: Specifically, the Rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1159--Nitric Acid Units--Oxides of Nitrogen as it appears appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.'' June 24, 2024, p. 8. \22\ For each individual SIC code that the EPA used to search for the absence of sources in CARB's facility CEIDARS emission database, please refer to our TSD for the applicable SCAQMD rule that is proposed to be removed from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. \23\ CARB's facility CEIDARS emissions database allows the public to search for stationary point criteria pollutant and air toxic emissions. This tool can be found at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/ab-2588-air-toxics-hot-spots/facility-search-tool. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On that basis, we propose to approve the rescissions of SCAQMD Rules 1103, 1115, 1126, 1153, and 1159. Rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1125 For the request to rescind SCAQMD Rule 1125, ``Metal Container, Closure and Coil Coating Operations,'' (amended August 2, 1991) (``SCAQMD Rule 1125'') the MDAQMD concluded that, in light of previous EPA-approved negative declarations for certain types of coating operations, existing SIP-approved MDAQMD Rule 1115 adequately covers the provisions of SCAQMD Rule 1125 for the coating operations not otherwise certified to be absent within the District.\24\ For these reasons, the District requests rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1125. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ MDAQMD, Final Staff Report, State Implementation Plan Cleanup: Specifically, the rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1122--Solvent Metal Cleaners (Degreasers), and Rule 1171--Solvent Cleaning Operations, as they appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District in Riverside County and to acknowledge that the currently SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1104--Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations and Rule 442--Usage of Solvents, adequately regulate the emissions in question, February 26, 2024, pp. 11-12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The EPA has confirmed the absence of applicable sources for surface coating of cans and coils in the Riverside County portions of the District using CARB's facility CEIDARS emission database and SIC codes. The EPA notes that the approved negative declarations do not address surface coating of drums. However, the EPA finds that the requirements for such coatings in MDAQMD Rule 1115 are essentially the same as the corresponding requirements for drums in SCAQMD Rule 1125. Since MDAQMD Rule 1115 is already approved as part of the California SIP the limits and other requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1125 need not be retained in the SIP, and rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1125 would not interfere with attainment and RFP or any other requirement of the Act for the purposes of CAA section 110(l). For these reasons, the EPA is proposing to approve the rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1125 from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. Rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1151 For the request to rescind SCAQMD Rule 1151, ``Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations,'' (amended September 6, 1991) (``SCAQMD Rule 1151''), the MDAQMD concludes that, in light of certain EPA-approved negative declarations for certain types of coating operations, MDAQMD Rule 1116, ``Automotive Refinishing Operations,'' (amended August 23, 2010) (``MDAQMD Rule 1116'') adequately covers the provisions of the SCAQMD Rule 1151 for the automotive coating operations not otherwise certified to be absent within the District.\25\ For these reasons, the District requests rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1151. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ MDAQMD, Final Staff Report, State Implementation Plan (SIP) Cleanup: Rescission of SCAQMD Rules 1115--Motor Vehicle Assembly Line Coating Operations and 1151--Motor Vehicle & Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations as they appear in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District and acknowledge that SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1116--Automotive Refinishing Operations along with various Federal Negative Declarations have replaced such rescinded rules in the SIP, March 25, 2024, p.2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The District concludes that the provisions of SCAQMD Rule 1151 are found in MDAQMD Rule 1116 and requests rescission on that basis. To document this conclusion, the District provides a detailed comparison between the requirements in MDAQMD Rule 1116 with those in SCAQMD Rule 1151.\26\ The EPA has reviewed the materials submitted by the MDAQMD and agrees that the requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1151 are found in MDAQMD Rule 1116. In addition, we find that the VOC content limits in MDAQMD Rule 1116 are as stringent or more stringent than the corresponding VOC content limits in SCAQMD Rule 1151. The EPA confirmed the absence of automotive manufacturing operations in the District, by using CARB's facility CEIDARS emissions database and SIC codes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ Id. pp. 13-18. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MDAQMD Rule 1116 is approved as part of the SIP. As such, the requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1151 need not be retained in the SIP, and rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1151 would not interfere with attainment and RFP or any other requirement of the Act for the purposes of CAA section 110(l). For these reasons, the EPA is proposing to approve the rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1151 from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP. Rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1173 Generally, SCAQMD Rule 1173, ``Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds,'' (amended December 7, 1990) (``SCAQMD Rule 1173'') is intended to control VOC leaks from [[Page 38581]] valves, fittings, pumps, compressors, pressure relief devices, diaphragms, hatches, sight-glasses, and meters at refineries, chemical plants, oil and gas production fields, natural gas processing plants, and pipeline transfer stations.\27\ SCAQMD Rule 1173 establishes leak control, component identification, operator inspection, maintenance and recordkeeping requirements and test methods for the components subject to the rule.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ SCAQMD Rule 1173, subsection (a). \28\ SCAQMD Rule 1173, subsections (c)-(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The MDAQMD states that the EPA approved negative declarations for petroleum refinery and chemical manufacturing industries in the MDAQMD. For these reasons, the District requests rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1173. In addition, the requirements in MDAQMD Rule 1102, ``MDAQMD Fugitive Emissions of VOCs from Components at Pipeline Transfer Stations'' (adopted October 26, 1994) (``MDAQMD Rule 1102'') and CARB's Oil and Gas Regulation \29\ cover the remaining requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1173 that are not covered by the negative declarations. Therefore, the District concludes that MDAQMD Rule 1102 adequately addresses VOC leaks associated with components at pipeline transfer stations.\30\ For these reasons, the District requests rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1173. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ 17 CCR Sec. 95666(a)(4) and (6). \30\ MDAQMD, Final Staff Report, State Implementation Plan (SIP) Cleanup: Specifically, the Rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1173--Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds as it appears in the SIP for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District and to acknowledge that currently SIP approved MDAQMD Rule 1102 along with various SIP approved Federal Negative Declarations adequately regulate the source categories, April 22, 2024, pp. 4, 6, and A-1-A-10. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The EPA confirmed the absence of refineries, chemical plants, oil and gas production fields and natural gas processing plants operating within the District by using the relevant SIC codes and CARB's facility CEIDARS emissions database. However, there are pipeline transfer stations within the District. The EPA compared MDAQMD Rule 1102 and CARB's Oil and Gas Regulation with SCAQMD Rule 1173 and we agree with the District that the California SIP adequately address VOC leaks from components at pipeline transfer stations within the District. Although the EPA approved the District's negative declaration for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG \31\ within the West Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment area, CARB's Oil and Gas Regulation is approved into the California SIP and applies to pipeline transfer stations within the District. Based on the comparison between SCAQMD Rule 1173, MDAQMD Rule 1102, and CARB's Oil and Gas Regulation, the EPA finds that the leak detection and repair requirements in MDAQMD Rule 1102 are less stringent than the corresponding requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1173. However, the corresponding requirements in CARB's Oil and Gas Regulation are essentially the same as those in SCAQMD Rule 1173. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ ``Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry,'' EPA 453/B-16-001, October 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As such, the requirements in SCAQMD Rule 1173 need not be retained in the SIP, and rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1173 would not interfere with attainment and RFP or any other requirement of the Act for the purposes of CAA section 110(l). For these reasons, the EPA is proposing to approve the rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1173 from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP.
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to approve the rescission of SCAQMD Rules 1103, 1115, 1125, 1126, 1151, 1153, 1159, and 1173 from the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD portion of the California SIP because they are no longer needed to meet any CAA requirement and because the rescissions would not interfere with RFP or attainment of any of the NAAQS or with any other applicable requirement of the CAA. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until July 27, 2026. If we take final action to approve the rule rescissions, our final action will rescind the rules from the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that deletes certain rules that were previously incorporated by reference from the applicable California SIP. The rules that were previously incorporated by reference are SCAQMD Rules 1103, 1115, 1125, 1126, 1151, 1153, 1159, and 1173 as listed in Table 2 of this document. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law, or rescissions of state law, as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action: Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Is not an Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) regulatory action because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program; Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). [[Page 38582]] List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: June 17, 2026. Michael Martucci, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2026-12935 Filed 6-25-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
What this changes
Amends 1 part of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
Rulemaking docket
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.32.2 POP SB County SIP Cleanup 1153 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.9.2 SC1103-NOE SB - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.18.1 SCAQMD1115 from EPA 94 SIP Book
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.6.1 Resolution 24-11 2024 22 Apr Action Item #9
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.33 SC1153 SIP Cleanup Final SR 2024 17 Jul
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.14.1 SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151 Min Item 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026Email from Gary Rubenstein CARB Aug 1980
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.30.1 Resolution 24-14 2024 24 Jun Action Item #13
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.14.2 SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151 Reso 24-06
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.2 Executive Order S-24-013_SSC signed 9.9.24
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.8.3 SC1103-Set Date - 2024 25 MAR
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.13 CARB rule_evaluation_form SC1115 1151 Cleanup 2024 18 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.11 Ltr SIP Cleanup Request SC 11732024 06 May
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.12 SC1103 Ltr_ Signed Submmision 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.9.2 SC1103-NOE SB - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.31.2 SC 1153 SIP Cleanup SBC NOE 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.39.1 SC1159 NOE Riv - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.17.1 SC1107 1125 1126-NOE Riv-2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.31.1 SC 1153 SIP Cleanup RS NOE 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.11 SC 1103 from EPA 94 SIP Book
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.26 SCAQMD1122 from EPA 94 SIP Book
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.9.1 SC1103-NOE Riv - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.42 SC1159 Ltr-signed submission - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2 Attachment A to EO S-24-013
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 202658 FR 45444
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.38.1 Action Item #14 2024 24 Jun
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 202643 FR 25684
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026Docket Index_MDAQMD SIP Cleanup
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.38.3 Set Date 5 2024 10 Jun
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.21 SC1121 1171-rule_evaluation_form
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.18.2 SCAQMD1151 from EPA 94 SIP Book
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.7.3 POP SC1173 SC1103SC1125 SC1126 2024 19 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.19 Ltr SC1115 1151 SIP Cleanup Request 2024 15 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.8.2 Resolution 24-09 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.14.2 SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151 Reso 24-06
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.13 SC1107 1125 1126-sip_completeness_checklist - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.15.1 SC 1107 1125 1126 - Action Item #8 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.4 SC 1173 Cleanup_sip_completeness_checklist 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.10 SC1103 Staff Report Final
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.15.2 SC 1107 1125 1126-Resolution 24-10 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.16 MD Rule 1115 2020 08 JUN
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.1 Attachment B to EO S-24-013
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.36 SC1159 sip_completeness_checklist - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.31.2 SC 1153 SIP Cleanup SBC NOE 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.19 SC 1107 1125 1126 submission - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.15.2 Public Notice SIP Clean Up SC 1115-1151 SB Sun 2-2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.32.1 POP RS County SIP Cleanup 1153 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.24.2 SC1122 1171 NOE SB
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.17.2 SC1107 1125 1126-NOE SB-2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.27 SC1122 1171-Ltr_signed submission - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.24.1 SC1122 1171 NOE Riv
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.17.2 NOE SB Co SIP Cleanup SC11151151 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.41 SC Rule-1159_1985 06 DEC
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.22.2 SC 1122 1171 - Action Item #17_2024 26 FEB
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.3 Letter to EPA - 2Q2024District Rules Package_SSC si
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.22.1 Reso 24-04 Action Item #17_ 2024 26 FEB
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.30.3 SC 1153 MD SIP Cleanup Set Date 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.8 SC1173 SIP Cleanup Final Staff Report 2024 30 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.14 SC1107 1125 1126 -rule_evaluation_form - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.5 SC 1173 SIP Cleanup CARB Eval Form 2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.4 Executive Order S-24-014_SCC Signed
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.23.2 MD Rule 1104 - 2018 23 APR
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.18 SC1107 1125 1126_Staff Report Final
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.7 SC1103-rule_evaluation_form - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.7.1 NOE RS SIP Cleanup SC1173 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.34 SC 1153 1994 EPA SIP Book for SCAQMD
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.2 Attachment C
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.38.2 Resolution 24-15 2024 24 Jun
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.14.3 SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151Set Date Item 2024 26 Feb
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1 Attachment A to EO S-24-014
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.6 SC1103- sip_completeness_checklist - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.8.1 Action Item #7 2024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 202647 FR 25013
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.14.1 SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151 Min Item 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.5 Letter to EPA3Q2024 District Rules Package_SSC Signed 1
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.25 SC 1122-1171 SIP Action_SR Final FEB
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.12 SIP_completeness_checklist SC1115 1151 Cleanup 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.20 SC1122 1171-sip_completeness checklist - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.1 Attachment B to EO S-24-014
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.40 SC1159 Staff Report Final
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.39.2 SC1159 NOE SB - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.7.2 NOE SB SIP Cleanup SC11732024 22 Apr
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.17.1 NOE RS Co SIP Cleanup SC1115 1151 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.10 SC 1173 1994 SCAQMD SIP Book
-
Proposed Rule June 26, 2026Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Rescissions of Outdated Requirements within Riverside County
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.35 SC1153 SIP Cleanup Request 2024 17 July
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.15.1 Public Notice SIP Clean Up SC 1115-1151 Press Enterprise 2-2024
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.28 SC 1153 SIP Cleanup_sip_completeness_checklist 2024 10 Jul
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.37 SC1159rule_evaluation_form - 2024 6 AUG
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026TSD_Mojave Desert SIP Cleanup
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.23.1 MD Rule 442 2006 27 FEB
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.2.16 SIP Cleanup SC1115 SC 1151 Final Staff Report 2024 25 Mar
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.29 SC 1153 SIP Cleanup_CARB_evaluation_form 2024 10 Jul
-
Supporting & Related Material June 26, 2026B.1.15.3 SC 1107 1125 1126 - Set Date #8
Public comments
What people are saying
-
Anonymous commenter 2026-07-14
“I write to request that EPA supplement the record before finalizing this action. The five items below are assessed as gaps or inconsistencies in the published proposal. 1. Footnote 24 does not support the finding it is cited for. The subsection concluding that MDAQMD Rule 1115 "adequately covers" the rescission of SCAQMD Rule 1125 cites footnote 24 as its authority. Footnote 24, however, is a staff report addressing SCAQMD Rules 1122 and 1171 — rules that do not appear in Table 2 and are not the subject of this rulemaking. No footnote in the proposal cites a staff report documenting the Dis...”
3,101 more characters
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Documents
- Full text (Federal Register) · June 26, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →