2016-30103: Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
We are revising our rules so that more of our procedures at the hearing and Appeals Council levels of our administrative review process are consistent nationwide. We anticipate that these nationally consistent procedures will enable us to administer our disability programs more efficiently and better serve the public.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
What this changes
Amends 3 parts of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
Rulemaking docket
-
Proposed Rule July 12, 2016Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process
-
Proposed Rule August 04, 2016Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process
-
Supporting & Related Material November 22, 2016SSA Staff Notes from 10/17/2016 Listening Session with Disability Advocacy Groups
-
Supporting & Related Material November 22, 2016Congressional ltr on SSA Disability Regs - Levin-Brown-Murray-Wyden-Becerra-Doggett-DeLauro.
-
Rule December 16, 2016Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process
-
Supporting & Related Material December 16, 2016Pending Regs presentation october 28
Public comments
What people are saying
-
United States Senate 2016-10-06
“See Attached”
-
Scully Disability Law 2016-09-21
“See Attached”
-
NA 2016-08-29
“I am a disability attorney of 14 years. I agree with NOSSCR. I would like to add a small personal point. I cannot control the medical record industry. Just this month, we have followed up and practically begged for medical records. Until the providers are under control, you cannot penalize an attorney/claimant. if the provider is not required to provide them within a specific time frame, how can you expect the attorney/claimant to do so? It is illogical and impossible. I would also like to ask: why can't the ALJ review the record a day or two prior to the hearing? That would solve everything.”
-
NA 2016-08-29
“Our office is in agreement with the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives' position on the proposed changes regarding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process, 81 Fed. Reg. 45079 (July 12, 2016), Docket No. SSA-2014-0052. Specifically, it has been our experience that the medical community does not feel a sense of urgency in responding to requests for medical records. Holding the representatives/claimants to a 5 day deadline is counterproductive and harmful to the ...”
1,567 more characters
-
NA 2016-08-29
“See attached file(s)”
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →