2026-11126: 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane; 1, 3-Butadiene; 13 Carcinogens (4-Nitrobiphenyl, etc.); Acrylonitrile; Asbestos; Benzene; Cadmium; Coke Oven Emissions; Cotton Dust; Ethylene Oxide; Formaldehyde; Inorganic Arsenic; Lead; Methylene Chloride; Methylenedianiline; Vinyl Chloride; Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators; Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards; Textiles; Sawmills; Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards for Shipyard Employment; and Walking-Working Surfaces
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
OSHA is scheduling a series of informal public hearings on the above-listed proposed rules. The public hearings will begin on August 19, 2026. All of the proposed rules listed in this notice were published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025, except for the Walking-Working Surfaces proposal, which was published on April 6, 2026.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
The rule, in full
2,323 words as published, June 03, 2026. View the original →
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2026) [Federal Register Volume 91, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2026)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 33131-33133] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-11126] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, 1926, and 1928 [Docket Nos. OSHA-2025-0006; OSHA-2025-0009; OSHA-2025-0011; OSHA-2025- 0012; OSHA-2025-0013; OSHA-2025-0014; OSHA-2025-0015; OSHA-2025-0016; OSHA-2025-0017; OSHA-2025-0018; OSHA-2025-0019; OSHA-2025-0020; OSHA- 2025-0021; OSHA-2025-0022;OSHA-2025-0023; OSHA-2025-0024; OSHA-2025- 0025; OSHA-2025-0026; and OSHA-2025-0072] RINs 1218-AD54; 1218-AD55; 1218-AD56; 1218-AD57; 1218-AD58; 1218-AD59; 1218-AD60; 1218-AD61; 1218-AD62; 1218-AD63; 1218-AD64; 1218-AD65; 1218- AD66; 1218-AD67; 1218-AD68; 1218-AD69; 1218-AD48; 1218-AD50; and 1218- AD73 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane; 1, 3-Butadiene; 13 Carcinogens (4- Nitrobiphenyl, etc.); Acrylonitrile; Asbestos; Benzene; Cadmium; Coke Oven Emissions; Cotton Dust; Ethylene Oxide; Formaldehyde; Inorganic Arsenic; Lead; Methylene Chloride; Methylenedianiline; Vinyl Chloride; Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators; Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards; Textiles; Sawmills; Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards for Shipyard Employment; and Walking-Working Surfaces
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
Action
Proposed rule; Notice of informal hearings. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
OSHA is scheduling a series of informal public hearings on the above-listed proposed rules. The public hearings will begin on August 19, 2026. All of the proposed rules listed in this notice were published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025, except for the Walking-Working Surfaces proposal, which was published on April 6, 2026.
Dates
Informal public hearings: The hearings will be held virtually and will begin August 19, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. The hearings will continue on subsequent weekdays. The number of hearings days will be determined by OSHA at a later date and will likely depend on the number of people who wish to testify. Additional information on how to access the informal hearings will be posted at https://www.osha.gov/deregulatory-rulemaking. NOITA submission deadline: To testify, provide documentary evidence, or question other witnesses at the hearing, interested persons must electronically submit their Notice of Intention to Appear (NOITA) on or before July 6, 2026. Deadline for hearing materials: In addition, those who request more than 10 minutes for their presentation at the informal hearing and those who intend to submit documentary evidence at the hearing must submit the full text of their testimony, as well as a copy of any documentary evidence, no later than August 5, 2026.
Addresses
Notice of Intention To Appear (NOITA): A NOITA must be submitted electronically at https://www.osha.gov/deregulatory-rulemaking. Follow the instructions online for making electronic submissions. Interested persons will have the ability to identify which of the rulemakings involved in these hearings they wish to provide testimony on. Those who file NOITAs must also submit electronic copies of all documents that they intend to use or reference during their testimony. OSHA will provide instructions for submitting testimony and documentary evidence to those who file a NOITA. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency's name and the docket numbers for the relevant rulemakings. All comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about submitting information they do not want made available to the public or submitting materials that contain personal information (either about themselves or others), such as Social Security Numbers and birthdates. Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the dockets, locate the docket number and docket link associated with the rulemaking(s) of interest on https://www.osha.gov/deregulatory-rulemaking, and use that link to go to www.regulations.gov. All comments and submissions are listed in the www.regulations.gov index; however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through that website. All comments and submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection through the OSHA Docket Office. Documents submitted to the docket by OSHA or stakeholders are assigned document identification numbers (Document ID) for easy identification and retrieval. The full Document ID is the docket number [[Page 33132]] plus a unique four or five-digit code. OSHA identified supporting information in these NPRMs by author name and publication year, when appropriate. This information can be used to search for a supporting document in the docket at www.regulations.gov. Contact the OSHA Docket Office at 202-693-2350 (TTY number: 877-889-5627) for assistance in locating docket submissions.
For Further Information Contact
For press inquiries, ASL interpretation, and language translation service requests: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, Office of Communications, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone: (202) 693-1999; email: [email protected]. For general information and technical inquiries: Contact Andrew Levinson, Director, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone: (202) 693-1950; email: [email protected].
Supplementary Information
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a series of deregulatory proposed rulemakings in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025, reflecting OSHA's commitment to modernizing workplace safety standards, addressing outdated regulations, and enhancing the flexibility of compliance strategies across multiple industries. These efforts are aligned with Executive Order 14192, ``Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,'' which directs agencies to reduce compliance costs and eliminate unnecessary regulatory burdens. Changes to Respiratory Protection Requirements for 16 Different Chemical Substances Sixteen of the rules that OSHA proposed are related to respiratory protection requirements for different chemical substances (1,2-dibromo- 3-chloropropane; 1, 3-Butadiene; 13 Carcinogens (4-Nitrobiphenyl, etc.); Acrylonitrile; Asbestos; Benzene; Cadmium; Coke Oven Emissions; Cotton Dust; Ethylene Oxide; Formaldehyde; Inorganic Arsenic; Lead; Methylene Chloride; Methylenedianiline; and Vinyl Chloride). The intent of each proposal is to reduce compliance burdens, allow for the use of more up-to-date technology, and/or better align the rules with the general Respiratory Protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134) to improve the comprehensibility of the requirements for respiratory protection programs for each chemical (90 FR 28263-28282; 90 FR 28286-28336; 90 FR 28349-28358). Respiratory Protection: Medical Evaluations OSHA also published a proposal to update the Respiratory Protection Standard (29 CFR 1910.134) by removing the medical evaluation requirements specified in the paragraph (e) for employees required to wear either a filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) or loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) (90 FR 28463). Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards OSHA also published a proposal to remove its Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards standard, 29 CFR 1910.144, as well as paragraph (c)(8) of OSHA's Textiles standard, 29 CFR 1910.262; paragraph (c)(11) of OSHA's Sawmills Standard, 29 CFR 1910.265; and OSHA's Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards for Shipyard Employment Standard, 29 CFR 1915.90, which require compliance with 29 CFR 1910.144. These standards require that red be the basic color for the identification of danger and stop, and that yellow be the basic color for designating caution and for marking physical hazards such as striking against, stumbling, falling, tripping, and caught-in-between. In the proposal, OSHA stated, among other things, that these standards are designed to address hazards that are sufficiently addressed by other Federal, State, and local requirements (state and local building and fire codes, OSHA's Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags standard (29 CFR 1910.145). OSHA also stated that relying solely on color to identify hazards is not effective for individuals with color vision deficiencies (90 FR 28282). Walking-Working Surfaces--Fixed Ladders Finally, on April 6, 2026, OSHA published a proposed rule intended to provide greater compliance flexibility for employers subject to the requirements in OSHA's Walking-Working Surfaces standard (29 CFR, Subpart D). OSHA proposed to remove a provision that sets a deadline (November 18, 2036) for the installation of personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems on all fixed ladders that extend more than 24 feet above a lower level. OSHA anticipates this change will allow employers to update their ladders when the ladders reach the end of their service lives, significantly reducing costs and offering greater flexibility (91 FR 17165). Requests for Hearings Several commenters requested public hearings on a number of the rulemakings described above (e.g., OSHA-2025-0006-0318, OSHA-2025-0009- 0006, OSHA-2025-0013-0003, OSHA-2025-0019-0003). OSHA agrees to hold a series of fully virtual public hearings, which will begin August 19, 2026, and continue on subsequent weekdays. Witnesses are welcome to testify about any topics, issues, or concerns they have with the proposed rules.
I. Informal Public Hearing--Purpose, Rules and Procedures
OSHA invites interested persons to participate in these rulemakings by providing oral testimony and documentary evidence at the informal public hearings to provide the agency with the best available evidence to use in developing these final rules (see 29 CFR 1911.15(a) and 5 U.S.C. 553(c)). The public hearings will be virtual to provide the opportunity for more stakeholders from across the country to participate in and/or observe the hearing without the financial and logistical burden of traveling to Washington, DC to attend in person. An administrative law judge (ALJ) will preside over the hearing and will resolve any procedural matters relating to the hearing. Although the presiding officers of the hearings are ALJs and questioning of witnesses is allowed on crucial issues, the proceedings are largely informal and essentially legislative in purpose. Therefore, the hearings provide interested persons with an opportunity to make oral presentations in the absence of rigid procedures that could impede or protract the rulemaking process. The hearings are not adjudicative proceedings subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Instead, these are informal administrative proceedings convened for the purpose of gathering and clarifying information. Accordingly, questions of relevance, procedure, and participation generally will be resolved in favor of developing a clear, accurate, and complete record. Although each ALJ presiding over the hearings makes no decision or recommendation on the merits of these proposals, the ALJ has the responsibility and authority necessary to ensure that the hearing progresses at a reasonable pace and in an orderly manner. To ensure a full and fair hearing, the ALJ has the power to regulate the course of the proceedings; dispose of procedural requests, objections, and comparable matters; confine presentations to matters [[Page 33133]] pertinent to the issues the proposed rule raises; use appropriate means to regulate the conduct of persons present at the hearing; question witnesses and permit others to do so; limit the time for such questioning; and leave the record open for a reasonable time after the hearing for the submission of additional data, evidence, comments, and arguments from those who participated in the hearing (29 CFR 1911.16). In addition, pursuant to 29 CFR 1911.4, the Assistant Secretary may, on reasonable notice, issue additional or alternative procedures to expedite the proceedings, to provide greater procedural protections to interested persons, or to further any other good cause consistent with applicable law. At the close of the hearings, there will be a post-hearing comment period during which those persons who submitted a NOITA may submit final briefs, arguments, summations, and additional data and information to OSHA.
II. Notice of Intention To Appear at the Hearing
Interested persons who intend to testify, provide documentary evidence, or question other witnesses at the hearings must electronically submit their NOITA via https://www.osha.gov/deregulatory-rulemaking on or before July 6, 2026 and in accordance with the instructions in the ADDRESSES section earlier in this document. The NOITA must provide the following information: (1) Name, address, email address, and telephone number of each individual who will give oral testimony; (2) Name of the establishment or organization each individual represents, if any; (3) Occupational title and position of each individual testifying; and (4) A brief statement of the position each individual will take with respect to the issues raised by each proposed rule the individual intends to comment on. The agency will consider the information in each submission when setting the schedule for the hearings. Before the hearings, OSHA will make the hearing procedures and schedule for the hearings available at https://www.osha.gov/deregulatory-rulemaking and in each docket. OSHA emphasizes that the hearings are open to the public; however, only individuals who file a NOITA may testify at any hearing or question witnesses. Witnesses will be asked to specify the approximate amount of time requested for each individual or group's testimony (5, 10, 15, or 20 minutes). Individuals or groups who request more than 10 minutes to present their oral testimony at the hearings, or who will submit documentary evidence at the hearings, must submit the full text of their testimony and all documentary evidence no later than August 5, 2026. OSHA will provide instructions for submitting testimony and documentary evidence to those who file a NOITA. The agency will review each submission. If OSHA believes the requested time is excessive, the agency will allocate an appropriate amount of time for the presentation. Any participant who fails to comply substantially with these procedural requirements may be limited to a 5-minute presentation. Before the hearings, OSHA will notify participants of the time the agency will allow for their presentation and, if less than requested, the reasons for its decision.
III. Certification of the Hearing Record and Agency Final Determination
Following the close of the hearings and the post-hearings comment period, the ALJ will certify the record to the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. The record will consist of all written comments and oral testimony as well as documentary evidence received during the proceedings. The ALJ, however, will not make or recommend any decisions as to the content of the final standards. Following certification of the record, OSHA will review all of the evidence received into each record and will issue final rules based on each record as a whole. Authority and Signature This document was prepared under the direction of David Keeling, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. It is issued under the authority of sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657), 5 U.S.C. 553, Secretary of Labor's Order No. 07-2025 (90 FR 27878), and 29 CFR part 1911. Dated: May 26, 2026. David Keeling, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. [FR Doc. 2026-11126 Filed 6-2-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
What this changes
Amends 6 parts of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
- 29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards
- 29 CFR 1915 Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Shipyard Employment
- 29 CFR 1917 Marine Terminals
- 29 CFR 1918 Safety and Health Regulations for Longshoring
- 29 CFR 1926 Safety and Health Regulations for Construction
- 29 CFR 1928 Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Agriculture
Rulemaking docket
-
Other June 06, 2025Memorandum Announcing OSHA's Proposed Changes to the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Rule (29 CFR 1910.134)
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Epstein, Danny, et al. "Return to training in the COVID‐19 era: the physiological effects of face masks during exercise." Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 31.1 (2021): 70-75.
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Anil, Abhijith K., et al. "Comparative study of the effect of N95 facemask and Powered Air-purifying Respirator (2 fans, N95 filter) on cardiovascular parameters of healthy individuals during exercise." Industrial health...
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Desai, Ushang, et al. "Evaluation of Spirometry for Medical Clearance in Occupations Requiring Respirator Usage." Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine 5.3 (2017): 67-77.
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Pappas, George P., et al. "Respiratory protective devices: rates of medical clearance and causes for work restrictions." American journal of industrial medicine 35.4 (1999): 390-394.
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025McLellan, Robert K. "Medical qualification for respirator use: An essential component of respiratory protection." American Journal of Industrial Medicine 63.10 (2020): 949-950. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23162
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Harber, Philip, and William S. Beckett. "Health effects of filtering facepiece respirators: Research and clinical implications of comfort, thermal, skin, psychologic, and workplace effects." American Journal of Industria...
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Brosseau, Lisa M., et al. "Evaluation of Minnesota and Illinois hospital respiratory protection programs and health care worker respirator use." Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene 12.1 (2015): 1-15. DOI: ...
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Brent C. Doney, Dennis W. Groce, Donald L. Campbell, Mark F. Greskevitch, William A. Hoffman, Paul J. Middendorf, Girija Syamlal & Ki Moon Bang (2005) A Survey of Private Sector Respirator Use in the United States: An Ov...
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Harber, Philip, et al. "Respirator Medical Examinations: Current Practices and Future Needs." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2023): 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003436
-
Supporting & Related Material June 09, 2025Gibbs, Jenna L., et al. "Self‐reported respiratory health symptoms and respiratory protection behaviors of young adult hog producers in the United States." American journal of industrial medicine 66.9 (2023): 794-804. do...
-
Supporting & Related Material June 24, 2025Rothstein, Alexander, et al. "A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Effects of N-95 Respirator vs Surgical Mask Use on Resting Metabolic and Respiratory Changes." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (20...
-
Proposed Rule July 01, 2025Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
-
Supporting & Related Material August 06, 2025Harber, Philip, et al. "Respirator Medical Examinations; Current Practices and Future Needs." American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2025): 621-627
-
Proposed Rule August 20, 2025Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
-
Proposed Rule June 03, 2026Notice of Informal Hearing: Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
-
Proposed Rule June 03, 2026Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 10 - Hua, Wei, et al. "Short‐term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks." Contact dermatitis 83.2 (2020): 115-121.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Testimony from the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM)
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 7 - Radonovich, Lewis J., et al. "Respirator tolerance in health care workers." Jama 301.1 (2009): 36-38.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 8 - Harber, Philip, et al. "Subjective response to respirator type: effect of disease status and gender." Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 52.2 (2010): 150-154.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 5 - Fiske, Gavriel. Only 60 percent have gas masks. The Times of Israel (2013).
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 6 - Kirschenbaum, Alan. "Mass terrorism and the distribution of gas masks in Israel: a longitudinal cohort analysis." International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters 19.3 (2001): 1-15.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 1 - Harber, Philip, and William S. Beckett. "Medical Evaluation for Respirator Use—Updated Approaches." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 66.10 (2024): 848-856.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 3 - McLellan RK, Harber P. Guide to the Medical Evaluation for Respirator Use, 2nd Edition. Beverly, MA: OEM Press; 2026. [Book]
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 2 - Harber, Philip, et al. "Critical Assessment of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Respirator Questionnaire." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 67.8 (2025): 616-...
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 4 - Harber, Philip, et al. "Respirator Medical Examinations: Current Practices and Future Needs." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 67.8 (2025): 621-627.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 11 - Yu, MD Jiade, et al. "Occupational dermatitis to facial personal protective equipment in health care workers: a systematic review." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 84.2 (2021): 486-494.
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 12 - Radha, K., et al. "Prevalence of physical and psychological impacts of wearing personal protective equipment on health care workers during COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Indian Jou...
-
Supporting & Related Material August 18, 2026Hearing Exhibit 9 - Shaw, Clarissa A., et al. "Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review." Journal of Nursing Scholarship 56.2 (2024): 227-238.
-
Other August 24, 2026Memorandum Reopening the Respirators Medical Clearance Docket (OSHA-2025-0006) for the Submission of Post-Hearing Documents and Comments
-
Supporting & Related Material September 02, 2026Exhibits from OSHA’s Informal Rulemaking Hearing on OSHA’s Proposed Rule Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
-
Supporting & Related Material September 21, 2026Order Denying Request to Extend the Post-Hearing Comment Period on the Proposed Rule to Amend the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
Public comments
What people are saying
-
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) 2026-10-06
“Please see the attached file for the AFL-CIO's final written brief on OSHA’s proposed standard on Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators.”
-
Anonymous Anonymous 2026-10-05
“See attached file(s)”
-
North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU) 2026-10-05
“Please see the attached post-hearing brief on behalf of North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU).”
-
Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates (SOCMA) 2026-10-02
“The Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates (SOCMA) respectfully submits the attached post-hearing information in response to questions raised by OSHA during SOCMA’s August 20, 2026 testimony regarding proposed amendments to the Respiratory Protection Standard. The submission provides supplemental member data requested by OSHA during the hearing.”
-
Association of Occcupational Health Professionals in Healthcare (AOHP) 2026-09-24
“See attached file(s)”
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Documents
- Full text (Federal Register) · June 03, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →