Division of Human Rights Docket 9 NYCRR Final Rule

ny-HRT-24-26-00008-A: Hearing and settlement procedures

Get alerted when the next rule lands

New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.

Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.

Create a free account & build one →

The rule, in full

460 words as published, October 07, 2026. View the original →

I.D. No. HRT-24-26-00008-A Filing No. 876 Filing Date: 2026-09-17 Effective Date: 2026-10-07 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Pro- cedureAct, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action: Action taken: Amendment of sections 465.7, 465.10, 465.11, 465.12, 465.15, 465.16 and 465.17 of Title 9 NYCRR. Statutory authority: Executive Law, section 295(5) Subject: Hearing and settlement procedures. Purpose: To revise hearing and settlement procedures to reflect current practice and promote equitable efficiency. Text or summary was published in the June 17, 2026 issue of the Register, I.D. No. HRT-24-26-00008-P. Final rule as compared with last published rule: No changes. Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from: Jeffrey Shalke, Division of Human Rights, 350 Main St., 10th Fl., Suite 1000B, Buffalo, New York 14202, (716) 847-3977, email: rulemaking@dhr.ny.gov Initial Review of Rule As a rule that does not require a RFA, RAFA or JIS, this rule will be initially reviewed in the calendar year 2031, which is no later than the 5th year after the year in which this rule is being adopted. Assessment of Public Comment A Notice of Rule Making was published in the State Register on June 17, 2026. The Division of Human Rights (Division) received one (1) com- ment associated with the rule making during the public comment period. The comment noted two concerns regarding the proposed amendments, which are summarized below. The Division’s response is provided for each concern. Comment: The proposed amended regulations do not create a meaning- ful discovery dispute resolution process. Litigants are still required to commence a special proceeding in New York State Supreme Court to enforce subpoenas or compel disclosure. Response: Special proceedings in New York State Supreme Court are not the sole option for enforcing subpoenas or compelling disclosure in a Division action. New York Executive Law § 295(7) provides the Division 13 Rule MakingActivities with the general authority to subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, and require the production of documents. More specifically, under 9 NYCRR § 465.12(f)(5) and (8), the administrative law judge has the power to call witnesses and direct the production of documents/evidentiary mat- ters at hearing. Additionally, under 9 NYCRR § 465.12(f)(1) the adminis- trative law judge has authority to rule upon all motions and objections, including those involving discovery. Comment: The proposed amended regulations do not expressly state that Division settlements and awards must be assessed by reference to comparable state and federal case law. Response: After consideration, the Division determined it is not neces- sary to expressly state in the amended regulations that Division settle- ments and awards must be assessed by reference to comparable state and federal case law. All orders and awards issued or approved by the Com- missioner will continue to conform to precedenti

Don't miss the comment window

One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.

See all rules with comments due soon →