2026-14300: Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes
Public comment closed · opened July 16, 2026.
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that the protective film cover on certain secondary power distribution assemblies (SPDA) might not have been removed. This proposed AD would require an inspection of certain SPDA for the presence of the protective film cover and applicable corrective actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
The rule, in full
2,435 words as published, July 16, 2026. View the original →
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2026) [Federal Register Volume 91, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2026)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 43575-43577] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-14300] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 135 / Thursday, July 16, 2026 / Proposed Rules [[Page 43575]] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2026-7221; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01377-T] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes
Agency
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
Action
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that the protective film cover on certain secondary power distribution assemblies (SPDA) might not have been removed. This proposed AD would require an inspection of certain SPDA for the presence of the protective film cover and applicable corrective actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Dates
The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 31, 2026.
Addresses
You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-7221; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above. Material Incorporated by Reference: For Transport Canada material identified in this proposed AD, contact Transport Canada, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888-663-3639; email [email protected]. You may find this material on the Transport Canada website at tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-7221. You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
For Further Information Contact
Jonathan Duong, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516-228-7300; email: [email protected].
Supplementary Information
Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments using a method listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2026-7221; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01377-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposal because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Jonathan Duong, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516-228-7300; email: [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. Background Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40, dated August 20, 2025 (Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes. The MCAI states that a manufacturing quality escape notice reported that a protective film cover (red protection film) might not have been removed from the bottom face of the No. 1 and No. 2 SPDA. If uncorrected, the blockage of the holes in the mesh on the SPDA could impede proper airflow, adversely affecting cooling performance. This could lead to overheating, operation outside of the normal unit conditions, and eventual SPDA failure, which could result in the loss of any system or combination of systems powered by these units, potentially affecting the safe operation of the airplane. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. [[Page 43576]] You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-7221. Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51 Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 specifies procedures for conducting a visual inspection of the top and bottom faces of the No. 1 and No. 2 SPDA for the presence of the protective film cover and, if applicable, corrective actions to remove the protective film cover. This material is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. FAA's Determination These products have been approved by the civil aviation authority of another country and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, that authority has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 described previously, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Explanation of Required Compliance Information In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to incorporate Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Material required by Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 for compliance will be available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-7221 after the FAA final rule is published. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would affect 25 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: Estimated Costs for Required Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Cost on U.S. Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 work-hours x $85 per hour = $85............................ $0 $85 $2,125 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on- condition action that would be required based on the results of any required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this on-condition action: Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cost per Labor cost Parts cost product ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85. Negligible.......... $85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected operators. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: [[Page 43577]] PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive: Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2026-7221; Project Identifier MCAI- 2025-01377-T. (a) Comments Due Date The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) by August 31, 2026. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40, dated August 20, 2025 (Transport Canada AD CF- 2025-40). (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical power. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a report that the protective film cover might not have been removed from the bottom face of the No. 1 and No. 2 secondary power distribution assemblies (SPDA). The FAA is issuing this AD to address the blockage of the holes in the mesh on the SPDA, which could impede proper airflow, adversely affecting cooling performance. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to overheating, operation outside of the normal unit conditions, and eventual SPDA failure, which could result in the loss of any system or combination of systems powered by these units, potentially affecting the safe operation of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Requirements Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in accordance with, Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40. (h) Exception to Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 Where Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40 refers to its effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this AD. (i) Additional AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD and email to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier, Inc.'s Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature. (j) Additional Information For more information about this AD, contact Jonathan Duong, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516-228-7300; email: [email protected]. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Transport Canada AD CF-2025-40, dated August 20, 2025. (ii) [Reserved] (3) For Transport Canada material identified in this AD, contact Transport Canada, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888- 663-3639; email [email protected]. You may find this material on the Transport Canada website at tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected]. Issued on July 13, 2026. Steven W. Thompson, Acting Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2026-14300 Filed 7-15-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
What this changes
Amends 1 part of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
Rulemaking docket
-
Proposed Rule July 16, 2026Airworthiness Directives: Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes
-
Supporting & Related Material July 16, 2026U.S. DOT/FAA - Supplemental AD Documents
Public comments
What people are saying
-
Anonymous Anonymous 2026-08-31
“While addressing the unremoved film is critical, clarification is requested regarding whether the proposed inspection and functional test procedures are technically sound and sufficient to ensure long-term airworthiness. An unremoved protective film cover restricts normal heat dissipation, creating localized thermal buildup during operation. A visual inspection to confirm film presence and a basic operational functional test may identify immediate open-circuit or hard failures, but they do not evaluate latent thermal damage. 1. The FAA should clarify whether visual inspection alone is suffi...”
3,430 more characters
-
Anonymous Anonymous 2026-07-17
“I suggest that the FAA set a reasonable timeframe for compliance with this proposed Airworthiness Directive. This will give operators enough time to plan inspections, and any needed corrective actions. Operators should be given enough time to complete the required actions since the identified unsafe condition is based on the possibility of the protective film cover remaining installed, which MAY cause future failure, rather than immediate safety risk. A compliance period that considers aircraft maintenance scheduling and logistics would help operators manage the issue effectively while ensu...”
229 more characters
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Documents
- Full text (Federal Register) · July 16, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →