in-20260909-IR-345250796RAA: 302 KAR 20:020 §1 (2), (3)

Get alerted when the next rule lands

New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.

Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.

Create a free account & build one →

Summary

I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors Requires feeder swine to have ear tag or site tattoo, entry permit, official health certificate, pseudorabies-negative testing, and post-entry quarantine for certain risk classes. Bans entry of feral pigs, pseudorabies-vaccinated pigs, or pigs fed raw garbage; requires CVI for all imports with PRV/brucellosis testing or certification for "low-risk" herds. Aligns with federal for interstate, but intrastate exhibit...

The agency’s own summary, as published.

The rule, in full

3,359 words as published, September 09, 2026. View the original →

TITLE 345 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ANIMAL HEALTH Readoption Review LSA Document #25-796 345 IAC 1-1.5 Official Forms I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 1-2.1 Garbage Feeding and Disposal I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 1-2.6 Animal Identification I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements SWINE State Requirement Citation Illinois Requires feeder swine to have ear tag or site tattoo, entry permit, official health certificate, pseudorabies-negative testing, and post-entry quarantine for certain risk classes. 8 Ill. Adm. Code 115.80 (§105.10) Michigan Bans entry of feral pigs, pseudorabies-vaccinated pigs, or pigs fed raw garbage; requires CVI for all imports with PRV/brucellosis testing or certification for "low-risk" herds. Mich. Admin. Code R. 287.713; MDARD "Pigs - ID & Movement" Ohio Aligns with federal for interstate, but intrastate exhibit movements may have stricter requirements via OAC 901:1-18 on exhibitions Ohio Dept. of Ag, "Movement of Swine" (OAC 901:1-18) Kentucky Mandates premises info (address or PIN), requires official individual ID (USDA tag, breed tattoo, EID, notches, etc.), CVI/entry permit valid 30 days, prohibits back tags on incoming animals. 302 KAR 20:020 §1 (2), (3) Idaho Requires individual official ear tags or approved ID, CVI, certification of no pseudorabies vaccination and no raw garbage feeding IDAPA 02.04.21.400 South Dakota Implements 9 CFR 86 without additional swine-specific ID; no evidence of stricter swine import rules SDAIB Animal Movement CATTLE & BISON State Requirement Citation Illinois Purebred/crossbred cattle or bison must be identified by registration number, tattoo, or microchip. Grade/non-registered cattle/bison must have an official ear tag in the right ear, plus tattoo at vaccination. 8 Ill. Admin. Code § 75.60 Michigan All cattle/bison imports require a CVI issued by a USDA-accredited veterinarian. Michigan uses official electronic ID (EID/RFID) - typically 15-digit "840" tags - for cattle and bison. MDARD Bison & Cattle Movement Rules; Michigan RFID Requirements Ohio Breeding cattle/bison must have official individual identification on a CVI issued within 30 days. Feeding/grazing animals require official ID for all sexually intact cattle/bison ≥18 months and all dairy cattle. Ohio Admin. Code 901:1-17-03 & 901:1-17-04 Kentucky Requires official USDA ear tags, breed tattoos, or USDA-approved EID recorded on the CVI. On-farm rules allow practices including ear notching for beef cattle/bison. 302 KAR 20:020; 302 KAR 21:030 Idaho All imported cattle/bison must have individual official identification listed on the CVI. Additional disease-status requirements and permits apply depending on class and origin. IDAPA 02.04.21 (Sections 200-203) South Dakota Breeding cattle/bison ≥18 months must have an official eartag (per 9 C.F.R. § 86.1) or registered breed-association tattoo. Interstate movement requires 840 RFID tags under federal ADT rules. SD Admin. Rules § 12:68:29:09 EQUINE State Requirement Citation Illinois Identification or description recorded on CVI/permit. Negative EIA test within 12 months. CVI required; electronic CVI required starting Jan 1, 2027; entry permit needed if out of state > 30 days. Ill. Admin. Code tit. 11 § 605.40 Michigan Photo, ISO microchip, or detailed physical description must appear on CVI. Negative EIA test within 12 months; EP test for Quarter Horses used for racing. CVI required; no entry permit; USDA-accredited vet must issue. MCL § 287.719 MCL § 287.720 Ohio Identification recorded on CVI (breed, color, markings, sex, microchip). Negative EIA test within 12 months (horses ≥12 months). CVI required; EECVI not accepted; intrastate movement may not require CVI. Ohio Dept. of Agriculture Equine Movement Rules CHAPTER 40-14 Kentucky Identification recorded on CVI (breed, color, markings, sex, microchip). Negative EIA test within 12 months; racetracks may require EHV-1 vaccination. CVI required within 30 days; import permit required for horses purchased at out-of-state sales. 302 KAR 22:130; KY Idaho Identification recorded on CVI; accepts EECVI digital certificates. Negative EIA test within 12 months (foals <6 months exempt if with dam). CVI required; entry permit only for certain disease-risk zones; approved eCVI systems allowed. IDAPA 02.04.21 South Dakota Permanent official ID (brand, tattoo, or equivalent per 9 CFR) required. Negative EIA/Coggins test within 12 months; reactors must be officially identified. CVI required within 30 days; extended equine CVIs allowed under defined rules. SD Admin. Rules 12:68:16 SHEEP & GOATS State Requirement Citation Illinois Must have individual approved official ID (scrapie tag or other USDA approved ID). Must be examined within 30 days and found disease free; no sore mouth or ringworm allowed for exhibition. Official Health Certificate with permit number required for breeding/exhibition/feeding entry. Ill. Admin. Code tit. 8 § 85.80 Michigan Official ID required for all sheep, including: 840 RFID tag, USDA scrapie tag, flock ID + tattoo, or neck collar/microchip (with restrictions). Negative EIA not required for sheep; slaughter sheep may use Group Identification Number (GIN). Interstate CVI required except direct to slaughter or via auction. MCL 287.711 Ohio Must be officially identified per 9 CFR part 79: ear tag, tattoo, microchip, or GIN (slaughter channels only). No general testing requirement except scrapie rules; microchips must be ISO compliant. CVI or owner/hauler statement required depending on movement; exhibition rules may require CVI. 901:1-13-04 and 901:1-17-06 Kentucky Must have USDA Official Identification for all sheep/goats entering for exhibition. No universal test requirement; follows federal scrapie program. CVI required for exhibition and most interstate movement; permit required depending on origin. 302 KAR 20:040; 302 KAR 20:020 Idaho Must have Producer Flock ID and individual official ID listed on CVI; regulated under IDAPA 02.08.01. Dairy goats ≥6 months: negative Brucella melitensis test; intact male sheep ≥6 months: negative Brucella ovis test (exhibition exceptions apply). Entry permit required unless using approved eCVI (GVL, Oregon, OVIS, etc.). IDAPA 02.08.01 South Dakota Must have USDA 840 EID tag, scrapie ID, or breed registration tattoo; official ID required unless exempt. Rams ≥6 months: negative Brucella ovis within 30 days (or certified flock exemption); slaughter rams must be paint branded "X". CVI required; Import permit required unless using approved eCVI; slaughter only animals exempt. S.D. Admin. Rules12:68:29; SDCL 40-5-5.1 CERVIDAE (DEER, ELK, MOOSE) State Requirement Citation Illinois Two forms of ID: one USDA official identifier (ear tag, microchip), plus secondary identifier such as herd tag. CWD: must originate from certified herd; cannot originate from endemic area. Tuberculosis: accredited herds exempt; others require negative tests based on herd status. - Brucellosis testing: accredited herds exempt; others have two negative tests. CVI issued within 30 days. Import permit required. CWD herd certification documentation required. Must comply with Illinois Tuberculosis & CWD statutes. 8 Ill. Adm. Code 85 Michigan Regulated via MDARD: captive cervidae (deer, elk, etc.) require state permit; likely require USDA tag + herd traceability. CWD surveillance program required; herd enrollment monitored. MDARD permit only; cervidae import permitted on case-by-case basis (especially due to screwworm). CVI required. MCL 287.711 MCL 287.951 to 287.969 MCL 287.951 Ohio Official ID required (RFID ear tag or metal NUES tag); microchip allowed in some cases. Disease testing dependent on herd status: CWD, Brucellosis, TB. Health certificate (ICVI) within 30 days. Entry permit number required. Comply with OAC 901:1 17 12 for non-domestic animals. 901:1-17-10 901:1-1-04 Kentucky All live cervidae imports must be part of CWD surveillance and identification program meeting CCWDSI standards. Only herds enrolled and monitored for ≥ 5 years (CWD surveillance) can export cervidae into Kentucky. Ban on importation except under CCWDSI. Department authorizes import. CVI required. 302 KAR 22:150 Idaho Two official IDs required per animal, listed on CVI. Herd must be enrolled in National CWD Herd Certification Program. CWD Herd Certification Program enrollment required. Deworming for Parelaphostrongylus tenuis if from east of 100th meridian. Brucellosis testing if from high-risk areas. CVI within 30 days. Import permit number issued by ISDA. IDAPA 02.04.21.600 South Dakota Official ID required: USDA 840 RFID tag, USDA metal tag, or microchip; must appear on CVI. Herd status statements on CVI: Certified, Monitored, or CWD-free signed by owner. CVI required. Entry permit number issued by state veterinarian. CWD certification statement required. ARSD 12:68:18:07; ARSD 12:68:25. CAMELIDAE (CAMELS, LLAMAS, ALPACAS, VICUNA, ETC.) State Requirement Citation Illinois Official ID required and must be listed on CVI; methods not specified. Animals must be disease-free; no specific health tests listed beyond standard CVI requirements. CVI required for all, except livestock moving directly to approved markets/slaughter; import permit required via department form. Ill. Admin. Code 8 § 85.150 Michigan ID options: metal/plastic NUES or AIN ear tag (15-digit 840 RFID), ISO microchip (non-ISO accepted with scanner). Camelids ≥6 mo must test negative for brucellosis within 30 days unless castrated males or exhibition animals. CVI required from USDA-accredited vet; no state entry permit required. MCL 287.729 Ohio Official ID: full description, ISO microchip, or photo per exhibition rule. Animals must show no clinical evidence of disease for exhibition/import; no specific testing mandated. CVI required for exhibition imports; must comply with OAC 901:1 17 15; additional permit may be required per ODA. OAC 901:1-18-11; OAC 901:1-17-15 Kentucky Official ID required: digital photo or described on CVI; if unweaned, can be listed on dam's CVI. No specific health tests cited; likely follow general livestock requirements. CVI required within 30 days; import permit required for sale/breeding entries; exhibition-only entries from Michigan exempt. 302 KAR 20:040 Idaho Official ID listed on CVI; accepts Extended Equine/Camelid CVI systems (eCVI via approved vendors). New World screwworm restrictions apply; other tests per general rules. CVI required within 5 days; entry permits required only when out-of-state quarantines exist; eCVI accepted. IDAPA 02.04.21.600 South Dakota ID required: USDA 840 EID tag, NUES tag, microchip, or breed-registration tattoo. Must be disease-free; no specific tests listed beyond CVI health attestation. CVI required and must list permit number (unless slaughter or auction exemptions); import permit required. ARSD 12:68 MICROCHIP State Requirement Citation Illinois Illinois recognizes USDA-approved injectable microchips (840 RFID) under the federal Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) framework, though they do not specify microchips in state ID regulations for cattle, swine, sheep/goats, equine, or camelids. Ill. Admin. Code 8 Michigan Michigan's Animal Industry Act (MCL § 287.711b) states that "official identification" includes electronic RFID, and ADT guidance explains microchips (840 prefix) are valid for goats, sheep, cervids, horses, and camelids, though cattle require visual RFID ear tags. (MCL § 287.711b Ohio Ohio's ODA rules require official eartags readable electronically for cattle/bison and also permit ISO-compliant microchips for cervids, camelids, and sheep/goats under ADT-aligned regulations OAC 901:1-17 OAC 901:1-18 Kentucky Kentucky's general ID rules allow official USDA ID-such as tags, tattoos, EID, or photo-including microchips if listed on CVI. 302 KAR 20:020 Idaho Idaho ADT rules accept 840-prefix injectable microchips or RFID ear tags across livestock species (cattle, sheep, goats, horses, camelids). Chips must begin with 840 and bear USDA shield IDAPA 02.04.26.240 South Dakota SD incorporates 9 CFR for ID methods, listing USDA 840 EID ear tags, NUES tags, microchips, and tattoos as official ID for livestock SDCL § 40 3 27 ARSD 12:68:29 X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 1-5 Rabies Immunization I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 1-6 Reportable Diseases I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 2-4.5 Brucellosis in Cervidae I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 2-9 Hunting Preserves I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 4-4 National Poultry Improvement Plan I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 5-4 Identification and Record Keeping I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 5-5 Moving Animals IV. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency

V. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule

VI. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796

V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule

VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements

X. Previous Amendments

XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 7-7 Disposal of Dead Animals I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements See chart below for more information. X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 9-2 Application of Inspection and Other Requirements I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 9-17 Labeling, Marking Devices, and Containers I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 10-1-1 Definitions I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements Regulatory Analysis LSA Document #25-796 V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Readoption Review 345 IAC 10-14-27 Labeling Containers I. Statement Whether the Subject Matter Covered by the Rule Remains Carried out by the Agency II. Rationale for the Continued Need for the Rule III. Analysis of fees, fines, and civil penalties under IC 4-22-2-19.6 IV. Cost-Benefit, Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact, or Regulatory Burden Statements V. Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Rule VI. Complaints and Comments VII. Difficulties Encountered VIII. Changes in Technology, Economic Conditions, or Other Factors IX. Other State or Federal Requirements X. Previous Amendments XI. Integration into Indiana Code BOAH is considering a proposal to add the requirements of this rule to IC 15-17. XII. Contact Information of Staff to Answer Substantive Questions Notice of Public Comment Period for Rule Readoption: 20260909-IR-345250796RNA Notice of Determination Received: August 24, 2026

Don't miss the comment window

One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.

See all rules with comments due soon →