al-al-6a87551fbea760123890519e: 585-X-6 — Emergency Response Readiness Measurement and Performance Audits
Comments due
Comments are filed with the agency on Regulations.gov — once the window closes, it stops accepting public input.
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Comment window open — make it count.
One comment is a voice; a thousand is a movement. Mobilize your list to file personalized comments before the deadline with One Click Politics advocacy software.
What this rule does
The Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board is proposing new regulations that will require local districts to report specific metrics related to emergency response readiness, such as 9-1-1 call volume and response times. The proposed rules also establish procedures for performance audits and provide for training and technical assistance to the districts at no cost.
Plain-language description generated by AI — not the agency’s official summary, which we have not captured for this rule. Read the official text →
The rule, in full
10,763 words as published, August 31, 2026. View the original →
APA-1 TRANSMITTAL SHEET FOR NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION Control: 585 Department or Agency: Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board Rule No.: Chapter 585-X-6 Rule Title: Performance Audits Readiness Measurement and Intended Action New Would the absence of the proposed rule significantly harm or endanger the public health, welfare, or safety? Yes Is there a reasonable relationship between the state’s police Yes power and the protection of the public health, safety, or welfare? Is there another, less restrictive method of regulation available that could adequately protect the public? No Does the proposed rule have the effect of directly or indirectly Yes increasing the costs of any goods or services involved? To what degree?: Indirectly, and to a limited degree. The rule does not change the 9-1-1 service charge, which is established by statute, and imposes no cost on subscribers or consumers. Districts will submit quarterly data and to retain source records. Those costs are mitigated because the required metrics are derived from data already generated by district call handling equipment and CAD systems, and because the Board furnishes the reporting cost to districts. Districts found deficient on audit may incur additional cost to implement a remediation plan; that cost is a function of the deficiency identified rather than of the rule itself. that might result from the absence of the proposed rule?the harm No Are all facets of the rule-making process designed solely for the purpose of, and so they have, as their primary effect, the Yes protection of the public? Does the proposed action relate to or affect in any manner any litigation which the agency is a party to concerning the subject No matter of the proposed rule? Does the proposed rule have an economic impact? Yes If the proposed rule has an economic impact, the proposed rule is required to be accompanied by a fiscal note prepared in accordance with subsection (f) of Section 41-22-23, Code of Alabama 1975. R E C ’D & F IL E D Certification of Authorized Official A U G 20, 202 6 I certify that the attached proposed rule has been propoLEdGiI LuAT IVEplSVnce A G EN C Y with the requirements of Chapter 22, Title 41, Code of Alabama 1975, and that it APA-1 conforms to all applicable filing requirements of the Administrative Procedure Division of the Legislative Services Agency. Signature of certifying officer Caleb Branch Caleb Branch Date Thursday, August 20, 2026 APA-2 ALABAMA STATEWIDE 9-1-1 BOARD NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION AGENCY NAME: Alabama Statewide Nine One One Board Chapter 585-X-6 Emergency Response Readiness RULE NO. & TITLE: Measurement and Performance Audits INTENDED ACTION: New SUBSTANCE OF PROPOSED ACTION: The Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board proposes to adopt a new Chapter 585-X-6 of the Alabama Administrative Code implementing Section 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session). The proposed chapter establishes the statewide Readiness Measurement System required by Section 11-98-4.3(b); prescribes the minimum data elements and metrics districts must report under Section 11-98-4.3(c), including 9-1-1 call volume, time to answer, time to respond, and answered versus unanswered communications across voice, text- to-9-1-1, and multimedia media types; establishes quarterly data submission, certification, and validation requirements and requires each district to designate a Readiness Data Officer; adopts a three-tier readiness framework and the contextual adjustment factors applied under Section 11-98-4.3(d); prescribes the procedures, scope, methods, and time limits governing performance audits authorized by Section 11-98-4.3, including notice to the audited district and the district's opportunity to respond to draft findings; prescribes the required contents of audit reports, remediation plans, and Board supervision of remediation; addresses funding of compliance activities under Section 11-98-4.3(g); commits the Board to provide training and technical assistance to districts at no charge; and establishes standards for confidentiality, redaction, and public release of audit reports. Appendix A identifies the NENA and APCO consensus standards incorporated by reference. Attachments A through D — the Readiness Data Dictionary and Metric Calculation Manual, the Performance Audit Workplan Template, the Performance Audit Report Template, and the Redaction and Publication Standard — are proposed for adoption as part of the chapter. The full text of the proposed chapter is available from the contact person named below and on the Board's website. TIME, PLACE AND MANNER OF PRESENTING VIEWS: Written comments on the proposed action will be received at any time from the date of publication of this notice through the close of the public hearing described below. Comments may be submitted by United States mail to Caleb Branch, Executive Director, Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board, P.O. Box 1790, Montgomery, Alabama 36102-1790; by hand delivery or courier to the Board's office at 1 Commerce Street, Suite 620, Montgomery, Alabama 36104; or by electronic mail to caleb@al911.gov. Written comments must be received no later than the final date for comment stated below. A public hearing on the proposed action will be held at 9:00 a.m. Central Time on Wednesday, November 18, 2026, at the Tuscaloosa County Emergency Operations Center, 7400 Richard M. Pierce Parkway, Northport, Alabama 35473, at which any interested person may present oral or written views. Written comments may also be delivered in person at the hearing. Any person wishing to present oral comment is requested, but not required, to notify the contact person named below in advance so that the Board may allot time. Any person requiring an accommodation to participate should contact the person named below not fewer than five (5) business days before the hearing. FINAL DATE FOR COMMENT AND COMPLETION OF NOTICE: Wednesday, November 18, 2026 APA-2 CONTACT PERSON AT AGENCY: Caleb Branch, Executive Director Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board Mailing address: P.O. Box 1790, Montgomery, Alabama 36102-1790 Street address: 1 Commerce Street, Suite 620, Montgomery, Alabama 36104 Telephone: (334) 440-7911 Email: caleb@al911.gov Website: al911.gov Caleb Branch Caleb Branch (Signature of officer authorized to promulgate and adopt rules or his or her deputy) ALABAMA STATEWIDE 9-1-1 BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 585-X-6 EMERGENCY RESPONSE READINESS MEASUREMENT AND PERFORMANCE AUDITS TABLE OF CONTENTS 585-X-6-.01 PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, AND SCOPE 585-X-6-.02 DEFINITIONS 585-X-6-.03 READINESS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; ESTABLISHMENT 585-X-6-.04 MINIMUM DATA ELEMENTS AND METRICS 585-X-6-.05 9-1-1 CALL VOLUME AND STAFFING STANDARDS 585-X-6-.06 TIME TO ANSWER 9-1-1 CALLS 585-X-6-.07 TIME TO RESPOND TO EMERGENCY CALLS 585-X-6-.08 ANSWERED VERSUS UNANSWERED CALLS 585-X-6-.09 DATA SUBMISSION, FREQUENCY, AND VALIDATION 585-X-6-.10 READINESS METRICS AND PERFORMANCE TIERS 585-X-6-.11 PERFORMANCE AUDIT INITIATION 585-X-6-.12 PERFORMANCE AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODS 585-X-6-.13 AUDIT REPORT; CONTENTS; PUBLICATION 585-X-6-.14 REMEDIATION PLAN; REQUIRED ELEMENTS 585-X-6-.15 BOARD SUPERVISION OF REMEDIATION IMPLEMENTATION 585-X-6-.16 FUNDING OF COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES 585-X-6-.17 BOARD-PROVIDED TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 585-X-6-.18 DUE PROCESS; INFORMAL RESOLUTION; RECORD 585-X-6-.19 CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY 585-X-6-.20 IMPLEMENTATION PHASES 585-X-6-APPENDIX A NENA AND APCO STANDARDS REFERENCE TABLE 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT A READINESS DATA DICTIONARY AND METRIC CALCULATION MANUAL 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT B PERFORMANCE AUDIT WORKPLAN TEMPLATE 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT C PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT TEMPLATE 6-1 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT D REDACTION AND PUBLICATION STANDARD 585-X-6-.01 PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, AND SCOPE. (1) Purpose. This chapter establishes (a) the statewide readiness measurement system required by Section 11-98-4.3 of the Code of Alabama 1975; (b) the performance metrics, reporting requirements, and operational standards applicable to districts and PSAPs; (c) the procedures for performance audits authorized by Section 11-98-4.3; (d) the standards for remediation planning and Board supervision; and (e) the framework for redaction and public release of audit reports. (2) Authority. These rules are adopted pursuant to the rulemaking authority granted to the Alabama 9-1-1 Board under Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3(h), Code of Alabama 1975, and consistent with the Alabama Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 22, Title 41, Code of Alabama 1975. (3) Scope. This chapter applies to all local communication districts, as defined in Section 11-98-1, and to all PSAPs operating within or on behalf of those districts that receive 9-1-1 voice calls, text- to-9-1-1 messages, or other 9-1-1 multimedia communications within the State of Alabama. This chapter does not affect the lawful authority of a district board of commissioners over a PSAP except as expressly provided in Sections 11-98-4.3 and 11-98-11 and these rules. (4) Relationship to existing law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to modify or supersede a PSAP's obligations under Section 11-98-11, Code of Alabama 1975, including the obligation under Section 11-98-11(c) for a 9-1-1 operator to remain on a 9-1-1 call until the PSAP has connected the caller with the appropriate provider of emergency services. The data collection categories set forth in this chapter correspond to and implement the call statistics required to be collected pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(c). (5) Construction. Where the words "shall" or "must" appear in this chapter, the action is mandatory. Where the words "should" or "may" appear, the action is recommended or permissive. Headings and titles are for convenience only and shall not affect interpretation. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular 6-2 Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, in addition to any definitions established in Chapter 585-X-1 of the Alabama 9-1-1 Board Administrative Code and the definitions in Section 11-98-1, Code of Alabama 1975. In the event of any apparent conflict, statutory definitions in Section 11-98-1 control. (1) "Abandoned Call" means a 9-1-1 communication, regardless of media type, that disconnects before a telecommunicator answers. Abandoned Calls are a subset of Unanswered Calls. (2) "Acceptable Level of Readiness" means performance that meets or exceeds the minimum metric thresholds established in Rules 585-X-6-. 05 through 585-X-6-.08 and that is consistent with Section 11-98-4.3(d). The Board's tier framework applying this term is set forth in Rule 585-X-6-.10. (3) "Act 2026-371" means the Act of the Alabama Legislature commonly known as HB 268, Regular Session 2026, codified at Sections 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975. (4) "APCO" means the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials International, Inc., a standards development organization producing American National Standards (ANS) for public safety communications jointly with NENA in certain instances. (5) "Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the State of Alabama or a designee thereof acting under Sections 11-98-4.3(e) and 11-98-4.3(f). (6) "Board" means the Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board established pursuant to Section 11-98-4.1, Code of Alabama 1975. (7) "Call Answer (or Answer)" means the point at which a telecommunicator engages the inbound 9-1-1 communication such that two-way communication can begin between the caller and the telecommunicator. For text-to-9-1-1 communications, Call Answer occurs when the telecommunicator opens the session and transmits the first responsive message. For multimedia (photo or video) 6-3 communications, Call Answer occurs when the telecommunicator acknowledges receipt within the Call Handling System. (8) "Call Answer Time (or PSAP Answer Time)" means the elapsed time, measured in seconds, between Call Arrival and Call Answer. The metric applies to all measurable 9-1-1 communications received by a PSAP, including voice, text-to-9-1-1, and multimedia. (9) "Call Arrival" means the moment a 9-1-1 communication enters the PSAP's Call Handling Equipment, evidenced by the SIP INVITE delivery, ringdown signal, queue entry timestamp, or equivalent event recorded by the Call Handling System. (10) "Call Handling Equipment (CHE)" means the integrated hardware and software system used by a PSAP to receive, present, queue, route, answer, transfer, record, and log 9-1-1 communications. The term Call Handling System (CHS) is used interchangeably with CHE. (11) "Call Processing Time" means the elapsed time from Call Answer to the earliest of the following events: (i) first transmission of dispatch information to the appropriate emergency service provider via Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD); (ii) completion of a transfer to a secondary PSAP; or (iii) completion of a transfer or connection to the appropriate emergency service provider. Call Processing Time is distinct from Total Time on Call (defined separately) and is the metric used for compliance reporting under Rule 585-X-6-.07. (12) "Call Volume" means the total number of inbound 9-1-1 communications received at a PSAP during a given reporting period, including voice (wireline, wireless, and VoIP), text-to-9-1-1, and any multimedia communications supported by the PSAP's Call Handling Equipment. (13) "CAD" means the Computer-Aided Dispatch system, including any successor or equivalent system, used by a PSAP or emergency service provider to log incidents, dispatch resources, and record event timestamps. (14) "Caller Hang-Up" means the voluntary termination of a 9-1-1 communication by the caller after Call Answer where the telecommunicator has confirmed that no emergency exists or that the caller does not require further assistance. Caller Hang-Ups are not Abandoned Calls. (15) "District" means an emergency communication district created and validly operating pursuant to Section 11-98-4, Code of Alabama 1975, 6-4 and in this chapter is used interchangeably with the term "local communication district" appearing in Section 11-98-4.3. (16) "Emergency Service Provider" means the meaning set forth in Section 11-98-1, Code of Alabama 1975, including law enforcement, fire, rescue, emergency medical, and other agencies of the State or a political subdivision providing emergency response services, and including private ambulance services as provided by statute. (17) "Executive Director" means the Executive Director of the Alabama 9-1-1 Board, or a designee thereof. (18) "Methods of Response" means the methods set forth in Section 11-98-11, Code of Alabama 1975, by which a PSAP responds to an emergency call, namely: direct dispatch, relay, transfer, or referral. The chosen method is selected by the district board of commissioners pursuant to Section 11-98-11(b). (19) "NENA" means the National Emergency Number Association, an ANSI- accredited standards development organization for 9-1-1 services. (20) "Operational Deficiency" means a confirmed condition affecting readiness identified through a performance audit, including deficiencies in staffing, training, supervision, written protocols, recordkeeping, technology, or facility condition. (21) "Performance Audit" means an audit conducted by the Board pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(a) to review and evaluate the readiness of a district, including the methods enumerated in that section. (22) "PSAP" means a Public Safety Answering Point, as that term is defined in Section 11-98-1, operated by or for a district to receive 9-1-1 communications and respond to those communications using one or more of the Methods of Response. (23) "Quarter (or Reporting Quarter)" means a calendar quarter beginning on January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1, respectively, and ending on the last day of March, June, September, or December. (24) "Readiness" means the meaning set forth in Section 11-98-4.3(a), Code of Alabama 1975: the capability of a district, including a PSAP, to expedite the answering, receiving, and transferring of 9-1-1 calls and texts to efficiently dispatch the appropriate emergency service provider as soon as possible to a correct location where property or life may be in jeopardy. For purposes of this chapter, the term "dispatch" in the foregoing statutory definition is read consistently with Section 11-98-11 to include direct 6-5 dispatch, relay, transfer, or referral, and to include the obligation under Section 11-98-11(c) for the 9-1-1 operator to remain on the call until the caller is connected to the appropriate emergency service provider. (25) "Readiness Data Dictionary" means the technical specification published as Attachment A to this chapter, defining each metric, required data fields, calculation methodologies, and submission formats. (26) "Readiness Data Officer" means the individual designated by a district pursuant to Rule 585-X-6-.09 as responsible for the accuracy, timeliness, and certification of data submissions to the Board. (27) "Readiness Measurement System" means the Board's statewide process for collecting, validating, scoring, and reporting readiness-related data submitted by districts, established pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(b). (28) "Staffing Level" means the number of trained and certified telecommunicators on duty and actively available to receive and process 9-1-1 communications during any given operational shift. (29) "Telecommunicator" means a public safety telecommunicator as defined in Section 11-98-1, Code of Alabama 1975, employed by or on behalf of a district PSAP to receive and process 9-1-1 communications. (30) "Total Time on Call" means the elapsed time from Call Answer to the point at which the telecommunicator disconnects from the 9-1-1 communication after the caller has been connected to the appropriate emergency service provider, consistent with Section 11-98-11(c). Total Time on Call is reported separately from Call Processing Time and is not used to determine compliance with Call Processing Time standards. (31) "Unanswered Call" means any 9-1-1 communication that reaches the PSAP but is not answered by a telecommunicator within the applicable Call Answer Time standard. Unanswered Calls include Abandoned Calls and any communication that disconnects, receives a busy signal, or is not retrieved before the standard is exceeded. (32) "Warm Transfer" means a transfer protocol in which the originating telecommunicator remains on the line with the caller until the receiving emergency service provider or secondary PSAP has assumed responsibility for the call, consistent with NENA-STA-020.1-2020 and 6-6 Section 11-98-11(c). Unattended ("blind") transfers are prohibited for emergency calls. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.03 READINESS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; ESTABLISHMENT. (1) Establishment. Pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(b), the Board shall establish and maintain a Readiness Measurement System to measure the readiness of district public safety services through the collection of data related to the answering, receiving, transferring, and dispatching functions for 9-1-1 communications, including voice, text messages, photos, and videos. (2) Best practices basis. The Readiness Measurement System shall be based on best practices adopted by nationally recognized associations, including NENA and APCO. The Appendix A Standards Reference Table identifies the standards incorporated by reference in this chapter. (3) Data Dictionary and Submission Specification. The Board shall publish, and may from time to time update, the Readiness Data Dictionary (Attachment A) defining each metric, required fields, calculation methods, validation rules, and submission formats. The Board shall provide districts written notice of any update to the Data Dictionary not less than ninety (90) days prior to the first reporting period in which the update applies, except that technical corrections that do not materially change reporting obligations may be issued with thirty (30) days' notice. (4) System architecture. The Board shall design the Readiness Measurement System to (a) accept data from PSAP Call Handling Equipment, CAD systems, and other primary sources; (b) perform automated validation, completeness, and anomaly checks; (c) generate district- and statewide-level dashboards and reports; and (d) maintain an auditable record of all submissions, validations, and revisions. (5) Maintenance. The Board shall review the Readiness Measurement System annually and shall publish on its website a current list of 6-7 incorporated standards, the version of the Data Dictionary in effect, and any pending updates. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.04 MINIMUM DATA ELEMENTS AND METRICS. (1) Data Collection. Pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(c), the Board shall collect from each district data that indicates readiness and can be validated, including data regarding 9-1-1 call volume, time to answer 9-1-1 calls, time to respond to emergency calls under Section 11-98-11, and answered versus unanswered calls. (2) Supporting indicators. The Board may also collect supporting operational indicators reasonably necessary to validate or contextualize the statutory metrics, including queue statistics, transfer outcomes, event timestamps, staffing levels, and CAD-coded call dispositions, provided that any such collection is tied to the statutory definition of readiness in Rule 585-X-6-.02(24). (3) Adjustment factors. Pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(d), the Board shall adjust its evaluation of metrics for factors relevant to each district, including population, geographic service area, crime rate, availability of emergency service providers, and complaints received pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(e). The framework for applying such adjustments is set forth in Rule 585-X-6-.10(2). (4) Multimedia and non-traditional sources. Where a 9-1-1 communication is delivered to the PSAP through a non-traditional pathway (including, without limitation, supplemental data delivered via NG9-1-1 services such as RapidSOS or successor systems), the PSAP shall report the metric on the basis of the event recorded by the receiving Call Handling Equipment. Where a communication is initially routed to a PSAP other than the appropriate PSAP and is subsequently transferred, each PSAP involved shall report Call Arrival measured at the point of arrival at its own CHE, in accordance with the Data Dictionary. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular 6-8 Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.05 9-1-1 CALL VOLUME AND STAFFING STANDARDS. (1) Standards foundation. This rule is grounded in NENA-REF-001-2003 (PSAP Staffing Guidelines Report and Staffing Worksheet); NENA- STA-014.2-2025 (Communications Center/PSAP Daily Personnel Operations Standard); APCO/NENA ANS 1.107.1-2015 (Standard for the Establishment of a Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Program for PSAPs); and APCO ANS 3.103.2-2015 (Minimum Training Standards for Public Safety Telecommunicators). Collectively, these standards establish that PSAP staffing shall be data-driven, continuously evaluated, and adjusted to call volume and workload demands. NENA-STA-014.2-2025 PSAPs should employ a formal, data-driven staffing methodology that accounts for call volume, average handle time, shift scheduling, absenteeism, non-call workload, and service-level targets. Staffing plans should be reviewed at regular intervals and updated based on actual call data. (2) Reporting requirements (Section 11-98-4.3(c)(1)). Each district shall report to the Board the following call volume and staffing data on a quarterly basis, disaggregated by month within the quarter, in the format prescribed by the Board's reporting templates and Attachment A: (a) Total 9-1-1 call volume received at each PSAP, including voice, text-to-9-1-1, and any multimedia communications; (b) Average daily and peak-hour call volume; (c) Authorized staffing level (total funded telecommunicator positions); (3) Minimum staffing standards. (a) Each PSAP shall, at all times, maintain a minimum of one (1) certified and trained telecommunicator on duty and actively available to answer 9-1-1 communications. A PSAP shall not routinely operate with single-person staffing during periods of 6-9 historically elevated call volume without a documented mitigation protocol on file with the Board. (b) Each PSAP shall maintain a current Staffing Policy. (c) A PSAP shall submit its most recent Staffing Policy to the Board upon request and as part of any audit conducted under Rules 585-X-6-.11 through 585-X-6-.13. (4) Workload mitigation planning. Each PSAP shall maintain a written contingency plan, reviewed annually, addressing periods when workload exceeds available staffing and periods in which major incidents or equipment failures reduce PSAP operational capacity. The plan shall identify designated mutual-aid PSAPs, overflow call routing protocols, and procedures for escalating staffing in response to surge events. This requirement aligns with NENA-STA-014.2-2025 and NENA-INF-017.3-2018. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.06 TIME TO ANSWER 9-1-1 CALLS. (1) Standards foundation. This rule implements the data collection requirement at Section 11-98-4.3(c)(2) and is grounded in NENA-STA-020.1-2020 (Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing), Section 2.2.1, which represents the current national consensus standard for PSAP call answer time as referenced in the NENA standard. NENA-STA-020.1-2020 Ninety percent (90%) of all 9-1-1 calls arriving at § 2.2.1 the PSAP shall be answered within fifteen (15) seconds. Ninety-five percent (95%) of all 9-1-1 calls should be answered within twenty (20) seconds. The interval is measured from Call Arrival to Call Answer, the point at which two-way communication can begin. (2) Mandatory performance standards. 6-10 (a) Level 1 readiness (mandatory). Each PSAP shall answer ninety percent (90%) of all 9-1-1 communications within fifteen (15) seconds of Call Arrival at the PSAP's Call Handling Equipment. (b) Level 2 readiness (recommended). Each PSAP should answer ninety-five percent (95%) of all 9-1-1 communications within twenty (20) seconds of Call Arrival. (c) Compliance with the mandatory standard shall be measured using data from the full preceding calendar month and evaluated on a monthly basis using data submitted under paragraph (3). (3) Reporting requirements. Each district shall report to the Board, on a quarterly basis and disaggregated by month, the following Call Answer Time data: (a) Percentage of 9-1-1 communications answered within fifteen (15) seconds; (b) Percentage of 9-1-1 communications answered within twenty (20) seconds; (c) Average Call Answer Time for the reporting period; (d) Monthly trend data for the preceding twelve (12) months. For the initial annual reporting cycle, districts shall report all available trend data and shall report on a rolling twelve-month basis thereafter. (4) Measurement methodology. (a) Call Answer Time measurement shall begin at Call Arrival, evidenced by the SIP INVITE delivery, ringdown signal, or equivalent CHE event, and shall end at Call Answer. Queue time attributable to system outages outside the PSAP's reasonable control shall be documented separately and excluded only as provided in Attachment A. (b) Abandoned calls. In calculating compliance with paragraph (2) (a), Abandoned Calls may be excluded from the denominator only where the district affirmatively demonstrates, through call recording or system log data, that the call was abandoned by the caller prior to fifteen (15) seconds of elapsed time. All other Unanswered Calls shall remain in the denominator. (c) Anti-manipulation. A district shall not configure its CHE, manipulate call counts, alter event timestamps, or use call 6-11 dispositions in a manner that artificially improves reported Call Answer Time metrics. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.07 TIME TO RESPOND TO EMERGENCY CALLS. (1) Standards foundation; statutory framing. This rule implements the data collection requirement at Section 11-98-4.3(c)(3), which references Section 11-98-11. Section 11-98-11 establishes four Methods of Response—direct dispatch, relay, transfer, and referral—from which a district board of commissioners selects the most feasible method, and further requires under subsection (c) that a 9-1-1 operator remain on the call until the caller has been connected to the appropriate provider of emergency services. "Time to Respond" under this chapter accordingly captures the elapsed period during which a PSAP completes its selected Method of Response, and may be reported either as Call Processing Time, Total Time on Call, or both, in accordance with Attachment A. NENA-STA-020.1-2020 Call processing standards establish required and recommended protocols for information gathering, verification, prioritization, and transfer of emergency information to dispatchers or emergency service providers. Required actions are designated by the normative term SHALL; recommended actions are designated by SHOULD. (2) Definitional distinction. (a) Call Processing Time ends at the earlier of: 1. first transmission of dispatch information to the appropriate emergency service provider; 2. completion of a transfer to a secondary PSAP; or 3. completion of a transfer or connection to the appropriate emergency service provider. This metric measures the speed at which the PSAP initiates the appropriate response. 6-12 (b) Total Time on Call (also referred to as "time to disconnect") is measured from Call Answer until the telecommunicator disconnects after the caller has been connected to the appropriate emergency service provider, consistent with Section 11-98-11(c). Total Time on Call is reported separately and is not used to determine compliance with Call Processing Time standards. (3) Performance standards. (a) Each PSAP shall process emergency 9-1-1 communications in accordance with its adopted Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), which shall be consistent with NENA-STA-020.1-2020 and Section 11-98-11. (b) Mandatory call processing protocols. Consistent with NENA- STA-020.1-2020 and Section 11-98-11, the following protocols are mandatory for all PSAPs:
2. The telecommunicator shall obtain and verify the caller's
location before all other information in life-threatening situations where location is unknown;
3. The telecommunicator shall determine the nature of the
emergency and classify the call by priority using the PSAP's adopted call classification system;
4. If a transfer is required, the telecommunicator shall use
the Warm Transfer protocol; unattended ("blind") transfers of emergency calls are prohibited; and
5. The telecommunicator shall remain on the call until the
caller is connected with the appropriate emergency service provider, as required by Section 11-98-11(c), and shall ensure that all information necessary for response has been transmitted before disconnect. (4) Standard operating procedures. Each district shall maintain current, written SOPs governing call processing, consistent with NENA-STA-020.1-2020 and Section 11-98-11. SOPs shall be reviewed at least annually, updated to reflect changes in technology, protocol, or law, and made available to the Board upon request and as part of any audit conducted under Rules 585-X-6-.11 through 585-X-6-.13. 6-13 Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.08 ANSWERED VERSUS UNANSWERED CALLS. (1) Standards foundation. This rule implements Section 11-98-4.3(c)(4) and is grounded in NENA- STA-020.1-2020 and APCO/NENA ANS 1.107.1-2015. The ratio of answered to unanswered calls is a core readiness metric and a leading indicator of capacity and operational deficiencies. APCO/NENA ANS PSAPs shall implement a Quality Assurance and Quality 1.107.1-2015 Improvement (QA/QI) program that includes regular review of unanswered and abandoned call data, identification of systemic causes, and documented corrective action where unanswered call rates indicate a performance deficiency. (2) Performance standards. (a) Each PSAP shall strive to achieve an Unanswered Call rate of no more than five percent (5%) of total Call Volume in any reporting month. An Unanswered Call rate consistently exceeding five percent (5%) shall be presumed to indicate a readiness deficiency requiring review under Rule 585-X-6-.10. (b) Each PSAP shall implement a written Unanswered Call Protocol containing, at a minimum:
1. Immediate identification: The PSAP shall configure its CHE
to automatically flag Unanswered Calls, including Abandoned Calls;
2. Callback attempt: For every Unanswered Call where a callback
number is available, the telecommunicator or automated callback system shall attempt to re-establish contact as soon as practicable, and in no event later than three (3) minutes after the Unanswered Call event, unless superseded by an active priority call; 6-14
3. Welfare check: Where callback cannot be established and the
call data suggests an emergency may exist (including without limitation calls from known locations, open-line calls, or calls with audible distress), the telecommunicator shall initiate a welfare check or notification to the appropriate emergency service provider; and
4. Documentation: All Unanswered Calls shall be logged in CAD
or equivalent, capturing arrival time, callback attempt time and result, and any action taken. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.09 DATA SUBMISSION, FREQUENCY, AND VALIDATION. (1) Reporting period and deadlines. Each district shall submit to the Board the data required under Rules 585-X-6-.05 through 585-X-6-.08 on a quarterly basis. Reports covering the preceding calendar quarter shall be submitted no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the second month following the end of the quarter, in accordance with the following schedule: Quarter Period Covered Report Due Q1 January 1 — March 31 April 30 Q2 April 1 — June 30 July 30 Q3 July 1 — September 30 October 30 Q4 October 1 — December 31 January 30 (2) Submission method. Reports shall be submitted through the electronic reporting portal established and maintained by the Board, or, where the portal is temporarily unavailable, by an alternative method designated by the Board in writing. The Board shall publish reporting templates, calculation worksheets (including a scoring formula reference), and 6-15 technical guidance, and shall make these resources available to districts at no cost. (3) Readiness data officer. (a) Each district shall designate, in writing, a Readiness Data Officer who is responsible for the accuracy, timeliness, and certification of data submissions to the Board. The PSAP Director may serve as the Readiness Data Officer or may designate a qualified subordinate. (b) Each district shall notify the Board of its Readiness Data Officer designation and any subsequent change within ten (10) business days of the designation or change. (4) Data integrity. Each district shall maintain source records sufficient to verify each submitted metric, including CHE logs, CAD records, staffing records, QA/QI records, and time-synchronization records. Records shall be retained for the period specified in Attachment A and made available to the Board upon request for validation or audit purposes. (5) Validation. The Board may perform completeness checks, anomaly detection, statistical outlier review, and reconciliation against other authoritative records to ensure data integrity. Where validation identifies a probable error, the Board shall provide the district written notice and a cure period of not less than ten (10) business days, unless an immediate public-safety concern requires accelerated escalation. (6) Non-submission. If a district fails to submit a required report by the applicable deadline, the Board shall provide the district written notice and a cure period of not less than twenty (20) business days. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-16 585-X-6-.10 READINESS METRICS AND PERFORMANCE TIERS. (1) Performance tier framework. Pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(d), upon audit, the Board shall evaluate each district's readiness using metrics reported under this chapter, adjusted for factors relevant to each district. The Board shall apply the following three-tier framework: Tier Readiness General Description Designation Tier 1 Acceptable Level of District meets or exceeds all mandatory Readiness minimum standards. No Board intervention required beyond routine reporting. Tier 2 Requires Improvement District fails to meet one or more mandatory minimum standards in a reporting period. Board may issue a corrective-action notice and require a written improvement plan, with technical assistance offered under Rule 585-X-6-. 17. Tier 3 Unacceptable Level District readiness deficiencies are of Readiness systemic, persistent, or acute and create a risk to public safety. Board may initiate audit and remediation under Rules 585-X-6-.11 through 585-X-6-.14. (2) Contextual adjustment factors. In applying the performance-tier framework, the Board shall consider the following factors that distinguish a true performance deficiency from operational circumstances beyond the district's reasonable control: (a) Unusual surge events (mass casualty incidents, natural disasters, declared emergencies) occurring during the reporting period; (b) Documented system or technology outages outside the district's control; 6-17 (c) Whether the district has implemented and is executing a Board-approved improvement plan. (d) Other exceptional circumstances. (3) Tier determination. Tier determinations shall be made by the Board on a quarterly basis following receipt of validated data, and may be revised upon receipt of additional information through audit or supplementary reporting. The Board shall provide each district written notice of its tier determination and any required follow-on action. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.11 PERFORMANCE AUDIT INITIATION. (1) Triggers. The Board shall initiate a Performance Audit upon referral from the Attorney General or as otherwise authorized by Section 11-98-4.3 and these rules. (2) Notice to district. Within five (5) business days of initiation, the Board shall notify the district in writing certified with signature of: (a) The audit commencement date; (b) The audit scope, including the original complaint, if applicable, and any Attorney General determination that the complaint is valid and that an audit is required; (c) Requested materials; and (d) The names of any Board personnel or contractors who will conduct the audit. (3) Audit commencement. An audit is deemed commenced on the date the Board issues written notice under paragraph (2). Any statutory or rule-based timing measured from "commencement" runs from that date. Author: Caleb Branch 6-18 Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.12 PERFORMANCE AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODS. (1) Authorized methods. A Performance Audit may include: (a) Interviewing any individual who may have knowledge of district performance, including district commissioners, the PSAP Director, telecommunicators, heads of local emergency service providers, first responders, and complainants/residents; and (b) On-site inspection of the PSAP, PSAP equipment or technical functionality, and monitoring of PSAP operations in real time. (2) Workplan. Each audit shall be conducted under a written workplan, in the form of Attachment B, that ties audit activities to the statutory definition of readiness and to the measured functions of answering, receiving, transferring, and dispatching. (3) Records and documentation. The Board may request documents reasonably necessary to evaluate readiness, including staffing rosters, training records, SOPs, QA/QI materials, incident logs, system performance extracts, CHE configuration records, and CAD exports. (4) Duration and resources. An audit may take as much time and involve as many investigative resources as the circumstances warrant, consistent with Section 11-98-4.3, but shall not exceed sixty (60) days unless an extension is authorized by applicable law. (5) Cooperation. Districts shall reasonably cooperate with audit activities. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-19 585-X-6-.13 AUDIT REPORT; CONTENTS; PUBLICATION. (1) Form. The Board shall prepare each audit report in the form set forth in Attachment C. (2) Minimum contents. Each audit report shall contain, at a minimum: (a) An evaluation of the district's readiness; (b) Findings of specific operational deficiencies confirmed; (c) The methodology used; (d) The evidence relied upon; and (e) Where applicable, a remediation plan as required by Rule 585- X-6-.14. (3) Approval and transmission. Upon approval, the Board shall transmit the audit report to the Attorney General. (4) Public disclosure. The Board shall publish the audit report in accordance with Attachment D (Redaction and Publication Standard) within ten (10) business days of Board approval, where applicable. (5) Redactions. Prior to publication, the Board may redact: (i) personal identifying information; (ii) information that would materially increase risk to PSAP security or operational integrity; and (iii) information protected by other applicable law, while preserving the report's findings and remediation requirements. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.14 REMEDIATION PLAN; REQUIRED ELEMENTS. (1) Mandatory plan. Where the Board confirms one or more Operational Deficiencies, the audit report shall include, or be accompanied by, a written Remediation Plan that identifies required corrective 6-20 actions, responsible parties, deadlines, interim safeguards, and measurable completion criteria. (2) Permissible measures. Remediation measures may include any of the actions, including: (a) Training requirements for telecommunicators; (b) Hiring additional telecommunicators; (c) Upgrade or replacement of CHE, CAD, or other PSAP technology; and (d) Amendments to PSAP operating protocols, scripts, and recordkeeping. (3) SMART milestones. Each Remediation Plan shall identify, for each required action: (a) The corrective action; (b) The responsible party; (c) The start date; (d) Measurable completion criteria; (e) The deadline; and (f) Interim safeguards to protect call handling during the remediation period. (4) District response. Within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of the Remediation Plan, the district shall submit a written implementation schedule and identify a remediation lead. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-21 585-X-6-.15 BOARD SUPERVISION OF REMEDIATION IMPLEMENTATION. (1) Authority. Pursuant to an Attorney General directive issued under applicable law, the Board may supervise the implementation of a Remediation Plan. (2) Supervision tools. Supervision may include: (a) Scheduled progress reviews (at least monthly); (b) On-site or remote verification activities; (c) Validation of staffing and training completion; (d) Verification of technology upgrades and operational cutovers; and (e) Targeted monitoring of readiness metrics to confirm sustained improvement. (3) Completion determination. The Board shall issue a written determination when the district has achieved an Acceptable Level of Readiness, evidenced by sustained metric improvement and completion of remediation milestones. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.16 FUNDING OF COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES. (1) Pursuant to Section 11-98-4.3(g), the Readiness Measurement System and the Board's compliance activities under this chapter may be funded as an advisory service pursuant to Section 11-98-5.2(b)(7)b., or from any outside source of funding received by the Board. (2) The Board shall maintain a cost-accounting method for readiness system costs and audit activities to ensure transparency and proper attribution of funding sources, and shall report annually on such costs in a manner consistent with the Board's general financial reporting 6-22 Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.17 BOARD-PROVIDED TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. (1) Purpose-built training. The Board shall develop and deliver purpose-built training, taught by Board personnel or qualified Board contractors, on the requirements of this chapter, including: (a) Readiness Data Dictionary application; (b) CHE and CAD configuration for accurate metric capture; (c) Staffing analysis methodology; (d) QA/QI program design; and (e) Audit readiness. (2) Continuing education credit. Training delivered by the Board under paragraph (1) shall award continuing education units (CEUs) recognized for purposes of telecommunicator certification to the extent permitted by applicable certification standards. The Board shall publish CEU values for each course on its website. (3) Technical assistance. The Board shall provide technical assistance, at no charge to a district, in the form of: (a) Staffing Analysis Templates and consultation on staffing model selection; (b) Reporting Templates and worksheets, including a scoring formula reference; (c) QA/QI Toolkit; (d) Sample SOPs; and (e) On-request consultation on data submission, metric calculation, and CHE configuration. 6-23 (4) Delivery formats. Training and technical assistance may be delivered in person, in regional sessions, on-site at PSAPs, or via webinar or self-paced electronic format. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.18 DUE PROCESS; INFORMAL RESOLUTION; RECORD. (1) Opportunity to respond. Prior to final Board approval of an audit report, the Board shall provide the district an opportunity to review and respond to draft factual findings using an expedited process that does not jeopardize any applicable statutory or rule- based deadline. (2) Informal resolution. At any stage, the Board and a district may resolve identified deficiencies informally through a corrective- action notice, a stipulated improvement plan, or other written agreement consistent with this chapter and the underlying statute. (3) Official record. The official record for an audit shall include the Attorney General’s referral, the notice of audit initiation, the audit workplan, materials reviewed, interview records or summaries, draft findings provided to the district, the district’s response, Board approval materials, and the final published audit report. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.19 CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY. (1) The Board and districts shall handle operational, technical, and security-sensitive materials using least-privilege access controls, secure transmission methods, and secure storage. 6-24 (2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require publication of information that would reasonably compromise PSAP security, while still meeting the statutory requirement that audit reports be made public. (3) Personally identifying information of callers, victims, witnesses, employees, and complainants shall be protected from public disclosure to the maximum extent permitted by law. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-.20 IMPLEMENTATION PHASES. (1) Phase 1 — System Build and Onboarding. The Board shall publish the Readiness Data Dictionary (Attachment A), Submission Specification, Reporting Templates, and Training and Technical Assistance offerings no later than ninety (90) days prior to the first required submission date. (2) Phase 2 — Initial Reporting. Districts shall begin quarterly submissions on the schedule established in Rule 585-X-6-.09(1). The Board shall issue initial readiness dashboards and reports during this phase. (3) Phase 3 — Audit Readiness. The Board shall publish the Performance Audit Workplan Template (Attachment B), Performance Audit Report Template (Attachment C), and Redaction and Publication Standard (Attachment D); districts shall designate audit points of contact. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-APPENDIX A NENA AND APCO STANDARDS REFERENCE TABLE. The following table identifies the national consensus standards incorporated by reference in this chapter. Where any such standard is revised, superseded, 6-25 or renumbered after the effective date of this chapter, the Board shall, through its Executive Director, provide districts written notice of the applicable current version. The Board shall maintain a current list of incorporated standards on its website. Standard Rule(s) Subject Matter NENA- 585-X-6-. Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing — call STA-020.1-2020 06, .07, . answer time (90% / 15s, 95% / 20s), call 08 processing protocols, wireless call handling, warm transfer requirement. NENA-REF-001-2003 585-X-6-.05 PSAP Staffing Guidelines Report and Staffing Worksheet — data-driven staffing methodology and minimum staffing planning. NENA- 585-X-6-.05 Communications Center / PSAP Daily STA-014.2-2025 Personnel Operations Standard — staffing levels, workload mitigation planning, contingency staffing. APCO/NENA ANS 585-X-6-. Standard for the Establishment of a 1.107.1-2015 05, .08 Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Program for PSAPs — QA/QI program requirements, unanswered call review, corrective action. NENA- 585-X-6-.05 Communications Center / PSAP Disaster and INF-017.3-2018 Contingency Plans Model Recommendation — contingency planning for staffing surges and system outages. NENA- 585-X-6-. Information Document for Handling Text- INF-007.1-2013 06, .07 to-9-1-1 in the PSAP — text-to-9-1-1 processing standards incorporated in call volume and answer time metrics. APCO ANS 585-X-6-.05 Minimum Training Standards for Public 3.103.2-2015 Safety Telecommunicators — baseline certification and training requirements. APCO Project 585-X-6-.05 Staffing workload calculation methodology RETAINS used as a recognized staffing model. Author: Caleb Branch Code of Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-26 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT A READINESS DATA DICTIONARY AND METRIC CALCULATION MANUAL.
1. Purpose and Statutory Alignment
This Data Dictionary establishes standardized definitions, data elements, and calculation methodologies for the statewide Readiness Measurement System required under Section 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975. It governs uniform reporting across all Alabama districts of the statutorily required metrics: 9-1-1 call volume; time to answer; time to respond (per Section 11-98-11); answered versus unanswered calls; and multimedia (voice, text, photos, videos) handling readiness. This Data Dictionary supplements the rule text and prevails as to technical specifications.
2. General Reporting Standards
2.1 Reporting Frequency (a) Required submission: Quarterly, due on the 15th of the second month following each quarter (April 30, July 30, October 30, January 30). (b) Reports shall be disaggregated by month within the quarter. (c) Format: Board-approved electronic submission (API, secure portal, or validated export). (d) Certification: PSAP Director or designated Readiness Data Officer must certify accuracy under penalty of false statement. 2.2 Time Standard All timestamps shall be recorded in either Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) or Central Time (with explicit DST notation). Time-zone treatment shall be consistent across reporting periods. Sub-second precision is preserved in source data and reported to whole-second precision.
3. Core Statutory Metrics and Definitions
3.1 9-1-1 Call Volume (§ 11-98-4.3(c)(1)) Definition: Total number of inbound emergency communications received by the PSAP during the reporting period. 6-27 (a) Includes wireline calls, wireless calls, VoIP calls, text- to-9-1-1 sessions, and multimedia NG9-1-1 sessions where supported. (b) Formula: Total Call Volume = Sum of all inbound emergency sessions logged in CHE plus text and multimedia platforms during the reporting period. (c) Excludes: outbound administrative or routine business calls; non-emergency 10-digit administrative calls. 3.2 Time to Answer — Primary Readiness Metric (§ 11-98-4.3(c) (2)) Definition: Elapsed time between Call Arrival at the PSAP CHE and Call Answer by a telecommunicator. (a) Start event: Call presented to PSAP (SIP INVITE received, ringdown signal, or equivalent CHE queue-entry event). (b) End event: Call Answer (telecommunicator pickup; for text, opening of the session and first responsive message; for multimedia, telecommunicator acknowledgment of receipt). (c) Calculation: Time to Answer (seconds) = Answer Timestamp − Call Arrival Timestamp. (d) Required reporting:
3. 95th percentile Time to Answer.
(e) Percentage answered within 15 seconds (mandatory standard, Rule 585-X-6-.06(2)(a)). (f) Percentage answered within 20 seconds (recommended standard, Rule 585-X-6-.06(2)(b)). 3.3 Time to Respond / Call Processing Time (§ 11-98-4.3(c)(3)) Definition: Elapsed time from Call Answer to first transmission of dispatch information to (or completion of transfer/connection to) the appropriate emergency service provider, consistent with the Methods of Response in Section 11-98-11. 6-28 (a) Start event: Call Answer Timestamp. (b) End event (whichever occurs first): 1. dispatch event logged in CAD; 2. transfer to a secondary PSAP; or 3. transfer or connection to the appropriate emergency service provider. (c) Formula: Call Processing Time = End-event Timestamp − Answer Timestamp. Companion metric — Total Time on Call ("time to disconnect"): Elapsed time from Call Answer to the telecommunicator's disconnect after the caller has been connected to the appropriate emergency service provider, consistent with Section 11-98-11(c). Reported separately and not used to determine compliance with Call Processing Time standards. 3.4 Answered vs. Unanswered Calls (§ 11-98-4.3(c)(4)) (a) Answered Call: any 9-1-1 communication where a telecommunicator establishes live communication (voice, text session, or multimedia acknowledgment) with the caller. (b) Unanswered Call: any 9-1-1 communication that (i) disconnects before answer; (ii) abandons in queue; or (iii) fails due to system overload or failure. (c) Formula: Answer Rate (%) = (Answered Calls ÷ Total Inbound Calls) × 100. (d) Subcategories required: Abandoned <15s; Abandoned ≥15s; system-failure unanswered; other unanswered.
4. NG9-1-1 and Multimedia Readiness Metrics
4.1 Text-to-9-1-1 Handling Time Time from text receipt at the CHE to first telecommunicator response message. Reported as average and 90th-percentile values, alongside the voice metrics. 4.2 Multimedia Capability Indicator Binary reporting: 0 = Not Supported; 1 = Supported (photos, videos, data). 4.3 Supplemental Data and Misrouted Communications Supplemental data delivered through services such as RapidSOS or successor systems is considered additional caller-context information. 6-29 The PSAP receiving the call shall report Call Arrival based on the time of receipt at its own CHE. Where a call is initially routed to a PSAP other than the appropriate PSAP and is subsequently transferred, each PSAP shall report Call Arrival measured at the point of arrival at its own CHE; transfer events shall be flagged in the report.
5. Data Validation and Audit Traceability
Each district shall retain the following records for a minimum of thirty-six (36) months or the established timeframe by the Records Disposition Authority: • Raw call logs from the CHE. • CAD exports. • QA/QI reports. • System event logs. • Time-synchronization records sufficient to demonstrate timestamp integrity.
6. Scoring Reference (Quick-Use Formulas)
Metric Formula Threshold (Tier 1) Time-to-Answer (Calls answered ≤ 15s ÷ Total ≥ 90% Compliance inbound calls) × 100 Recommended Answer (Calls answered ≤ 20s ÷ Total ≥ 95% (Level 2) inbound calls) × 100 Answer Rate (Answered ÷ Total inbound) × 100 ≥ 95% (Unanswered ≤ 5%) Call Processing Time — (Calls dispatched/transferred ≤ ≥ 90% Priority 1 60s ÷ P1 calls) × 100 Call Processing Time — (Calls dispatched/transferred ≤ ≥ 90% Non-Priority 1 90s ÷ Non-P1 calls) × 100 Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-30 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT B PERFORMANCE AUDIT WORKPLAN TEMPLATE.
1. Audit Overview
(a) Audit Title: (b) Initiating Authority: Attorney General’s Office (c) District Audited: (d) PSAP Name(s): (e) Audit Commencement Date: (f) Lead Auditor / Audit Team:
2. Audit Scope
The audit may evaluate district readiness, including: (a) Answering efficiency (Rule 585-X-6-.06) (b) Call processing and response (Rule 585-X-6-.07) (c) Answered versus unanswered communications (Rule 585-X-6-.08) (d) Staffing adequacy (Rule 585-X-6-.05) (e) Technology functionality (CHE, CAD, recording, redundancy) (f) Operational protocols and SOPs (g) QA/QI program
3. Potential Interviews — Mandatory Stakeholders
(a) District commissioners (b) PSAP Director (c) Telecommunicators (representative sample across shifts) (d) Heads of local emergency service providers (law enforcement, fire, EMS) (e) First responders (representative sample) 6-31 (f) Complainant(s), if applicable (g) Secondary providers, if applicable (e.g., wreckers, DHR)
4. Site-Visit Checklist
4.1 Facility Review • PSAP physical security • Backup power systems • Redundant connectivity (ESInet, internet, etc.) • Workstation functionality 4.2 Technology Inspection • Call Handling Equipment (CHE) • CAD system • Recording systems • NG9-1-1 capabilities (text, multimedia) • Time-synchronization integrity
5. Operational Observation Protocol
Auditors shall observe (where permitted): live call intake; queue management; transfer workflows; dispatch coordination; and shift staffing levels. Observation duration: minimum four (4) operational hours, recommended to span peak and off-peak periods.
6. Evidence Standards
Acceptable evidence includes call detail records, CAD logs, training records, staffing schedules, SOP manuals, QA/QI reports, and system performance dashboards. All evidence must be verifiable, time-stamped, and source-documented. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-32 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT C PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT TEMPLATE.
1. Cover Page
(a) District Name (b) Audit Authority: Section 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975 (c) Audit Dates (d) Board Approval Date (e) Public Release Date
2. Executive Summary
(a) Overall Readiness Tier: Tier 1 (Acceptable) / Tier 2 (Requires Improvement) / Tier 3 (Unacceptable Readiness) (b) Key findings (c) Public-safety impact assessment
3. Methodology
(a) Interview list (b) Site-visit dates (c) Data sources reviewed (d) Observation duration
4. Readiness Evaluation
4.1 Call Handling Performance • Time-to-Answer metrics • Answer rate 4.2 Processing and Response Efficiency • Call Processing Time by priority • Transfer accuracy and warm-transfer compliance (§ 11-98-11(c)) 6-33 • Dispatch coordination 4.3 Technology Readiness • CHE reliability • NG9-1-1 capability status • System redundancy 4.4 Staffing and Training Assessment • Staffing levels vs. call volume (Staffing Analysis review) • Training compliance • QA/QI program maturity
5. Confirmed Operational Deficiencies
Each deficiency shall be documented with: description; supporting evidence; risk level (Low / Moderate / High); and impact on readiness.
6. Recommended Remediation Plan
6.1 Corrective Actions (illustrative) • Additional telecommunicator hiring • Training programs • Technology upgrades • SOP revisions • Personnel replacement (if appropriate) 6.2 Implementation Timeline • 30 days: immediate corrective actions • 90 days: operational stabilization • 180 days: full compliance target
7. Board Supervision Plan
• Monthly progress reviews • Data-monitoring checkpoints 6-34 • Verification inspections
8. Final Determination
• Acceptable Readiness Achieved: Yes / No • Further Board Oversight Required: Yes / No Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 585-X-6-ATTACHMENT D REDACTION AND PUBLICATION STANDARD.
1. Governing Principle
Section 11-98-4.3 requires audit reports to be made public. The Board shall ensure transparency while safeguarding sensitive operational and security information related to PSAP operations and critical infrastructure.
2. Public Disclosure Requirements
The following shall be publicly released: (a) Executive summary (b) Readiness evaluation (c) Confirmed deficiencies (d) Remediation Recommendations
3. Mandatory Redactions
3.1 Security-Sensitive Infrastructure (a) Network diagrams (b) ESInet routing topology (c) PSAP floorplans (d) Cybersecurity architecture 6-35 3.2 Personally Identifying Information (PII) • Caller identities • Employee personal data • Complainant identities (if confidential) 3.3 Tactical Operational Details • Specific dispatch tactics • Vulnerability or exploitation details • Real-time operational weaknesses that could endanger responders
4. Redaction Process
(1) Draft report completed. (2) Legal and security review conducted. (3) Redaction log created (documenting each redaction by category and authority). (4) Final public version published. (5) Full unredacted version retained in secure Board archive.
5. Publication Timeline
• Report submitted to Attorney General • Public posting within ten (10) business days of Board approval • Publication locations: Alabama 9-1-1 Board website; Attorney General website (where applicable)
6. Records Retention
• Public reports: permanent archive. • Unredacted reports: secure retention for a minimum of seven (7) years. • Supporting audit evidence: minimum five (5) years. Author: Caleb Branch Statutory Authority: Sections 11-98-4.1 and 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371 (HB 268, 2026 Regular 6-36 Session); rulemaking authority expressly granted by Section 11-98-4.3(h). History: New Rule: Published ______; effective ______. 6-37 APA-6 ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR APA RULE (Section 41-22-23(f)) Control No: 585 Department or Agency: Alabama Statewide 9-1-1 Board Rule No: Chapter 585-X-6 Emergency Response Readiness Measurement and Rule Title: Performance Audits Intended Action: New This rule has no economic impact. Yes This rule has an economic impact, as explained below:
1. NEED/EXPECTED BENEFIT OF RULE:
Section 11-98-4.3, Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2026-371, requires the Board to establish a system for measuring the readiness of local communication districts, to collect specified call statistics, to conduct performance audits, and to supervise remediation. Section 11-98-4.3(h) directs the Board to adopt rules. This chapter is the instrument by which that mandate is carried out. Expected benefits are: uniform, validated statewide readiness data that permits year-over-year and district-to-district comparison; earlier identification of staffing, technology, and protocol deficiencies affecting emergency call handling; audits conducted against published metrics and documented methods rather than ad hoc criteria; a defined remediation and supervision process; and no-cost Board training and technical assistance that raises baseline capability across districts.
2. COSTS/BENEFITS OF RULE AND WHY RULES IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT,
AND FEASIBLE MEANS FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCES AND ACHIEVING THE STATED PURPOSE: Costs. Districts will incur recurring administrative cost to configure call handling equipment and CAD systems for accurate metric capture, to extract and validate quarterly data, to designate and support a Readiness Data Officer, and to retain source records for the period specified. The Board will incur cost to build and maintain the reporting portal, to validate submissions, to develop and deliver training, and to conduct audits when initiated. Districts found deficient on audit may incur remediation cost, which may include training, additional telecommunicator positions, or technology APA-6 upgrades. Benefits. The public receives measurable assurance that emergency communications are answered and dispatched within recognized standards. Districts receive comparative performance data, no-cost technical assistance, and a defined path to resolve deficiencies short of enforcement. Why this is the most effective, efficient, and feasible means. The metrics are drawn from data already produced by existing district systems, avoiding new local data-collection infrastructure. The Board centralizes the reporting portal, calculation worksheets, and training so that each district is not required to develop its own methodology, which both reduces aggregate cost and produces comparable data. The chapter adopts existing NENA and APCO consensus standards rather than creating Alabama-specific technical requirements, reducing vendor and training cost. Alternatives considered and rejected were (a) voluntary reporting, which would not yield the complete and comparable data the statute requires, and (b) audits conducted without published metrics, which would impose greater burden on audited districts and produce findings that are difficult to defend.
3. EFFECT OF THIS RULE ON COMPETITION:
Minimal to none. The regulated parties are emergency communication districts, which are political subdivisions serving defined geographic areas and are not in competition with one another. The chapter incorporates vendor-neutral national consensus standards and does not require, endorse, or exclude any particular call handling equipment, CAD, or reporting vendor. To the extent districts procure technology to address a deficiency, procurement remains subject to applicable competitive bid law.
4. EFFECT OF THIS RULE ON COST-OF-LIVING AND DOING BUSINESS IN THE
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA WHERE THE RULE IS TO BE IMPLEMENTED: No direct effect. The rule does not alter the 9-1-1 service charge, which is established by statute, and imposes no fee, tax, license, or reporting obligation on individuals or private businesses. Indirect effects, if any, are limited to district administrative expenditures funded from sources already authorized by Section 11-98-6(a).
5. EFFECT OF THIS RULE ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA WHERE THE
RULE IS TO BE IMPLEMENTED: Neutral to modestly positive. The rule creates no new private-sector employment obligation. Within districts, existing personnel are expected to absorb Readiness Data Officer duties in most cases. Where an audit confirms that staffing is inadequate to meet answering and processing standards, a remediation plan may require additional telecommunicator positions, which would increase public-safety APA-6 employment in the affected district. No reduction in employment is anticipated.
6. SOURCE OF REVENUE TO BE USED FOR IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THIS RULE:
Section 11-98-4.3(g) authorizes the Readiness Measurement System and the Board's compliance activities to be funded as an advisory service pursuant to Section 11-98-5.2(b)(7)b., Code of Alabama 1975, or from any outside source of funding received by the Board. Rule 585-X-6-.16 requires the Board to maintain a cost-accounting method for readiness system and audit costs and to report those costs annually. District- level compliance costs are payable from 9-1-1 Fund distributions for purposes authorized by Section 11-98-6(a).
7. THE SHORT-TERM/LONG-TERM ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THIS RULE ON EFFECTED
PERSONS, INCLUDING ANALYSIS OF PERSONS WHO WILL BEAR THE COSTS AND THOSE WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE RULE: Who bears the cost. In the short term, emergency communication districts bear the administrative cost of system configuration, quarterly reporting, and records retention, and the Board bears the cost of the reporting system, validation, training, and audits. Districts that are audited and found deficient bear remediation cost in the short to medium term. Who benefits. The general public in every district benefits, directly through improved answering and dispatch performance and indirectly through transparency of published audit results. Districts benefit from comparative data, no-cost training and technical assistance, and early identification of deficiencies before they result in a critical failure. Emergency service providers benefit from more accurate and timely dispatch information. Long term. Costs are expected to decline after the initial configuration and onboarding period as reporting becomes routine and automated. Long-term benefits — reduced delay in emergency response and avoidance of the human and financial cost of failed call handling — are expected to exceed the recurring administrative cost.
8. UNCERTAINTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ESTIMATED BENEFITS AND BURDENS OF
THE RULE, INCLUDING QUALITATIVE/QUANTITATIVE BENEFITS AND BURDEN COMPARISON: The principal uncertainties are: (a) variation among districts in the capability of existing call handling equipment and CAD systems to produce the required timestamps, which affects initial configuration cost and cannot be estimated uniformly in advance; (b) the number of performance audits that will be initiated, which depends on referrals and is outside the Board's control; (c) the scope and cost of remediation, which depends on deficiencies not yet identified; and (d) the difficulty of expressing the benefit of the rule in monetary terms, because the benefit is measured in seconds of reduced delay in emergency response and in adverse outcomes avoided. The Board has weighed a quantifiable and recurring administrative burden against a APA-6 qualitative but substantial public-safety benefit and has concluded that the benefit predominates.
9. THE EFFECT OF THIS RULE ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH:
No environmental effect. The effect on public health is positive: faster and more reliable answering, processing, and dispatch of emergency communications directly improves the delivery of emergency medical, fire, rescue, and law enforcement response.
10. DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH IF THE RULE IS
NOT IMPLEMENTED: No environmental effect. If the rule is not implemented, the statewide readiness measurement system required by Section 11-98-4.3 would not exist; districts would report no comparable readiness data; performance audits would proceed without defined metrics or methods; and deficiencies in call answering, processing, staffing, and technology would continue undetected. The resulting risk is delayed or misdirected emergency response, with corresponding risk to life and property. Signature of certifying officer Caleb Branch Caleb Branch Date Thursday, August 20, 2026
Rulemaking docket
We haven’t pulled this rulemaking’s full docket yet. View docket 585-X-6 on Regulations.gov →
Documents
- Full text (state register) · August 31, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →